<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!-- 

This is an RSS feed, designed to be read in an RSS application.
For more about RSS see the BBC guide to RSS at: 
         http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/3223484.stm

-->
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>IC Blog of Matou</title>
<description>Matou&apos;s blog on Informed Consent</description>
<link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/weblogs/Matou/</link>
<generator>The IC RSS Gadget</generator>
<webMaster>webmaster@informedconsent.co.uk</webMaster>
<ttl>360</ttl>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:19:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
<item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Credit where it is due</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/63479/</link>
 <description>Oh, my! It&apos;s been over a year since I blogged. There were reasons for that (and still are) but sometimes &quot;a man&apos;s gotta do what a man&apos;s gotta do&quot; - in this case remove the bushel and let others see the light.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Humiliation vs embarrassment</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11022/</link>
 <description>I was told recently that they were the same thing so, 
pedant that I am, I looked them up. Definitions varied 
but some phrases were more common than others. One 
curious thing is that (according to the dictionaries) 
humiliation was “strong embarrassment” but nowhere in 
the definition of embarrassment was humiliation 
mentioned. “Loss of self-respect” and “degradation” 
were common for humiliation but the nearest 
embarrassment could get was “shame .”</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:17:45 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>An apology ... and VE</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11021/</link>
 <description>I’m going to start this log off with an apology.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Accentuate the positive...</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11020/</link>
 <description>…so goes the old song. And so goes my philosophy as a 
lifestyle Dominant. This weblog is the Dom-side view of 
the latest weblog of my beloved cerrynn. This is 
probably as opinionated as hers but, just like hers, 
these are only our opinions – feel free to disagree as 
strongly as you like. No offence is intended.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Sermon from the Mount</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11019/</link>
 <description>Mount Nod, the district in Coventry to be more precise. 
Now, before the Right Irreverend Matou starts 
pontificating, a few other things….</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>The Internet</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11018/</link>
 <description>Before I get into the ‘meat’ of this log, a few side 
issues. To kayla, memo will be en route shortly – and 
you looked absolutely *stunning* at the Fashion Show. 
ShadowRose gently (lovely lady that she is) rapped my 
knuckles about my last weblog, pointing out that the 
Empire Trilogy is actually a joint effort between 
Raymond Feist and Janny Wurts. She is absolutely right. 
Mea culpa. They write brilliantly together and 
definitely better, in my humble opinion, than either on 
their own. Arigato gazeimas, ShadowRose, thank you. </description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2004 06:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Your will, Sensei</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11017/</link>
 <description>Those are the words cerrynn used in an email to me 
earlier tonight. They brought a smile to my face, as I 
am very well aware of their origin. As anyone would be 
who has also read the Empire trilogy by Raymond Feist. 
The book cerrynn is currently reading is the last of 
the three. Whilst being set on a strange world called 
Kelewan, Feist has borrowed heavily from Japan and 
other far eastern countries in the construction of the 
culture of the inhabitants, the Tsurani.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:27:52 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Otanjobi omedeto, cerrynn-sensei</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11016/</link>
 <description>This weblog is written publicly in the spirit of the 
following quotation, taken from “Hagakure: The Book of 
the Samurai” by Yamamoto Tsunetomo, 1631-1700, 
translated by W. Scott Wilson.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>The Gods of Mischief</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11015/</link>
 <description>According to Norse mythology, Loki was known as the God 
of mischief  because of all his little pranks. 
According to some sources he was also known as the God 
of Fire, though they don’t say why. I guess he must 
read my weblogs and have taken umbrage because he paid 
me a visit after VE last night.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>On a couple of topics</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11014/</link>
 <description>It seems that our weblogs have caused quite a furore in 
certain quarters and my read count has joined cerrynn’s 
in its skyward journey. We are even the subject of an 
editorial together with attendant comments from some of 
their readers. The whooshing noise you hear is the 
sound of a point being completely missed (at the time 
of writing) by all but one of them. To that one person, 
should they read this weblog, we say “Thank you”. </description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>A message from cerrynn … and the continuing saga</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11013/</link>
 <description>First off, a message from cerrynn to those who have 
memoed and emailed her recently – she is currently 
effectively silenced by the esoteric mysteries of 
communications and computers - or, to put it another 
way, her ‘puter is bust! Hopefully, this will be fixed 
very shortly and she will be able to reply to you.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>MKane</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11012/</link>
 <description>Thank you for your comments, Mkane. I expressly set out 
not to flame and I am gratified that I succeeded. 
However, I think you misunderstood my essential 
purpose. The primary point I was making is that the 
Internet is not responsible for the evolution of D/s, 
as both an online and real life phenomenon, to the 
stage it is today in the same way that the tsetse fly 
is not responsible for its evolution as a spreader of 
disease – it is the people who use it. Further, I felt 
that your points were only showing one side of the 
coin. </description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 05:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Re: &quot;Evolution of D/s&quot; -- A considered response</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11011/</link>
 <description>I don’t think that MKane has been entirely fair to the 
process we understand as “Evolution”. I wonder if he 
would examine all of Nature’s failures and oddities and 
shake his head sadly, tut-tutting, “Evolution, eh?” </description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 21:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Spanking - the other cheek</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11010/</link>
 <description>Clare’s weblog of 29 December 2003, “Get out of BDSM?” 
where she commented that “I’m just not likely to get 
excited by an otk spanking anymore” caught the 
attention of cerrynn and myself. We certainly aren’t 
disagreeing with her, it’s a personal thing and not 
something it is possible to disagree with but we 
thought we would give our slant on things.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Upcoming events - slightly slushy</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11009/</link>
 <description>Well it’s that time of the month again – no, not PMS – 
VE. *And* it’s the Christmas edition, to boot. Velvet 
Eden has always had a special place in the 
Matou/cerrynn lifestyle. We always look forward to it. 
Funny that two out of three of our favourite events are 
hosted by BV and cerbie. Unfortunately, this month will 
be the second one I will be attending without cerrynn.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:17:14 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Positives</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11008/</link>
 <description>I doubt that Ms blackowner dreamed that her weblog 
would initiate the furore that has actually transpired. </description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:06:28 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Headline: Shock! Horror! Dom has “flying” experience!</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11007/</link>
 <description>Ok, relax. No, Matou has not suddenly turned switch. 
What Matou *did* do was to take up the gracious offer 
of another blogger on this list to go flying with her 
(no prizes for guessing who).</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>On various weblogs (including da vinci&#39;s!) ... and no slushy romanticism (sorry</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11006/</link>
 <description>I don’t have time to read all the weblogs and for the 
last few days I haven’t had time to read any at all. 
Returning at last and going to the logs of 
my “favourites” I find a veritable furore.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:14:25 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>For cerrynn{M}</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11005/</link>
 <description>Informed Consent is a public forum, very public, in 
fact, something of which we should all be aware. 
Cerrynn and I are very aware of it and we write our 
weblogs with that in mind. For once, I am going to 
depart from that and write this weblog with one person 
in mind. Despite that, many people, some close friends 
and some we know only via these hallowed pages will 
read it. It is excessively maudlin and dreadfully 
sentimental so read on at your own risk.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:29:10 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>So the bloggers dinner party actually happened</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/11004/</link>
 <description>Not exactly as in the fantasy one since all the dinner 
guests already knew each other very well. What can I 
say about it? Well, to start with, cerrynn and I had 
been looking forward to this for many reasons, most 
happy – but some with a tinge of sadness. Due to the 
Real Life/Vanilla problems we have alluded to in 
previous weblogs she has to leave the UK and return to 
the US for a while, at least two months, and this 
dinner party would probably be the last time we (the 
guests) would meet up before she leaves. </description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

