<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!-- 

This is an RSS feed, designed to be read in an RSS application.
For more about RSS see the BBC guide to RSS at: 
         http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/3223484.stm

-->
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>IC weblog of Cuteprincess</title>
<description>Cuteprincess's weblog on Informed Consent</description>
<link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/weblogs/Cuteprincess/</link>
<generator>The IC RSS Gadget</generator>
<webMaster>webmaster@informedconsent.co.uk</webMaster>
<ttl>360</ttl>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:50:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
<item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Happy Birthday!</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/221110/</link>
 <description>Happy birthday Master Jamie, hope you have a great day, and I love you loads.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Sheesh - how easy to ruffle feathers.</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/211366/</link>
 <description>I wrote a weblog last night about some rather disturbing public play I witnessed. Boy what a can of worms that opened! I cannot believe how many feathers I managed to ruffle. The thing is, I could understand it, maybe, if I had named names, or if anything I wrote was untrue, but that wasn&apos;t the case. The comments came in thick and fast, and generally, the tone was either cynical or patronising or both. Which in itself, is quite disturbing. Disturbing that I was somehow mistaken with what I, and several others witnessed, and disturbing that without actually coming out and saying it, the implication being that the scene that occured was, in some way, to be condoned and accepted.</description>
</item>
<item>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Dangerous territory.</title>
 <link>http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/211292/</link>
 <description>I&apos;m seriously in danger of becoming disillusioned, and thoroughly pissed off. Tonight, (yes it&apos;s now very late), I have heard of two episodes, both firsthand, of subs ruining great relationships, and not relationships that the subs themselves were involved in. In both cases, the subs involved were using the BDSM lifestyle as a mask for deeper desires - plain old sex. Now don&apos;t get me wrong, sex is great- in it&apos;s place, but the sex I&apos;m referring to here has nothing to do with the lifestyle. The sex I&apos;m talking about is the good old fashioned, any position, any time, VANILLA shag. I guess I feel sorry for those subs, both male, incidentally, as this is clearly the only way they can get their rocks off. What makes me angry is the fact that one of these subs dispensed these, oh, so worthy, pearls of wisdom regarding sex, assuring other very new people into the scene, that not only was sex with several others, necessary, but practically compulsory! Not quite what newbies need or even want, to hear. That alone makes me ashamed to be associated with subdom.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
