Sun 27 Feb 05, 3:12 PM
LeatherDom7
9 yrs |
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
I like the idea of keeping a sub in total bondage for a weekend and controlling everything that she can and can't do during that time. On arrival, she would be put into bondage - perhaps chains - that would allow her to move around but she would be unable to leave until she was released on the Sunday night. Perhaps a long chain leash would prevent her from reaching the front door! She would sometimes be allowed enough movement to be able to carry out tasks or commands, and at other times she might be tied so that she was totally immobile. Everything at all times would be controlled - her degree of mobility, how she was dressed, her food, her use of the bathroom, her sight and speech through intermittent use of blindfold and gag, and so on. Of course there would be periods of "play", but even when just sitting together chatting on the sofa, she would still be held in chains.
Naturally everything that happened during the weekend would be by mutual agreement because it's important to me that a sub is happy at all times. So it is not a "forced" confinement. (And appropriate safety precautions at night). But does bondage for its own sake strike any chords with others (almost a pun!)? Or perhaps many of you do this all the time?!
Any comments gratefully received. Edited Sun 27 Feb 05, 3:31 PM by LeatherDom7
|
27 Feb 05, 5:09 PM
Masterstroke
UK(WF), 7 yrs
 |
OrionM wrote:
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
I like the idea of keeping a sub in total bondage for a weekend and controlling everything that she can and can't do during that time. On arrival, she would be put into bondage - perhaps chains - that would allow her to move around but she would be unable to leave until she was released on the Sunday night. Perhaps a long chain leash would prevent her from reaching the front door! She would sometimes be allowed enough movement to be able to carry out tasks or commands, and at other times she might be tied so that she was totally immobile. Everything at all times would be controlled - her degree of mobility, how she was dressed, her food, her use of the bathroom, her sight and speech through intermittent use of blindfold and gag, and so on. Of course there would be periods of "play", but even when just sitting together chatting on the sofa, she would still be held in chains.
Naturally everything that happened during the weekend would be by mutual agreement because it's important to me that a sub is happy at all times. So it is not a "forced" confinement. (And appropriate safety precautions at night). But does bondage for its own sake strike any chords with others (almost a pun!)? Or perhaps many of you do this all the time?!
Any comments gratefully received.
|
If it rocks you and your sub/slave/partner then go for it, just remember safety. I always keep in the back of mind if my slave could escape if I was to have a heart attack etc.
I.E. there is a key near by etc that she could get to in an emergency. As for your definition of "play", my slave is often left chained in the house while I go out to socialise. It is what ever works for those involved.
|
27 Feb 05, 5:44 PM
scabrat
PT, 7 yrs
|
Masterstroke wrote:
OrionM wrote:
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
I like the idea of keeping a sub in total bondage for a weekend and controlling everything that she can and can't do during that time. On arrival, she would be put into bondage - perhaps chains - that would allow her to move around but she would be unable to leave until she was released on the Sunday night. Perhaps a long chain leash would prevent her from reaching the front door! She would sometimes be allowed enough movement to be able to carry out tasks or commands, and at other times she might be tied so that she was totally immobile. Everything at all times would be controlled - her degree of mobility, how she was dressed, her food, her use of the bathroom, her sight and speech through intermittent use of blindfold and gag, and so on. Of course there would be periods of "play", but even when just sitting together chatting on the sofa, she would still be held in chains.
Naturally everything that happened during the weekend would be by mutual agreement because it's important to me that a sub is happy at all times. So it is not a "forced" confinement. (And appropriate safety precautions at night). But does bondage for its own sake strike any chords with others (almost a pun!)? Or perhaps many of you do this all the time?!
Any comments gratefully received.
|
If it rocks you and your sub/slave/partner then go for it, just remember safety. I always keep in the back of mind if my slave could escape if I was to have a heart attack etc.
I.E. there is a key near by etc that she could get to in an emergency. As for your definition of "play", my slave is often left chained in the house while I go out to socialise. It is what ever works for those involved.
|
I also like the longer period session, but as a male submissive I'm afraid. I also like the idea of multiple person scenes and longer periods of incarceration to provide a much more realistic feel. Ultimately it is a 'real' 24/7 (consenting of course) rather than 'realistic' position that I seek.
Good luck in your quest and may the lucky 'victim' be fulfilled. |
27 Feb 05, 10:28 PM
gimpneil
UK(DN), 7 yrs
|
i I have tried to arrange a meeting like this but unfortunally it fell throuhg a the last minute due to work issue, One of my fantasies about the whole time would be, to be completely bound and sat on the settee next to my master/mistress and talk for a while while watching television, however in a cruel twist I would be blindfoled the whole time there by not being able to watch the show that my master/mistress was enjoying (and of course none of my shows unless you want to be VERY cruel) |
28 Feb 05, 1:39 AM
missmeek
UK(LN), 9 yrs
|
OrionM wrote:
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
I like the idea of keeping a sub in total bondage for a weekend and controlling everything that she can and can't do during that time. <snip>
|
An extended period in bondage is a scenario that I've been thinking about quite a lot recently. I've had experiences where I've been bound for a few hours, and been chained to the bed overnight, but now I'm thinking more along the lines of a session extending to several days if it was possible.
Control is my thing and I love the idea of being kept in various states of bondage for a length of time. Not knowing exactly when I would be released, never being completely free. I think that would work for me. 
So I can completely understand you wanting to create a 'scene' of long-term bondage, but I see it from the submissive's point of view. 
SJxx |
28 Feb 05, 9:18 PM
Masters_Apprentice
UK, 7 yrs |
I spent 3 hours shackled with my wrists and hands chained together so I couldn't reach. I had to carry out various tasks, and I really struggled to make a cup of tea even, so I'm not sure about a whole weekend!
Still I love a challenge, and I rather enjoyed it! Its all part of my learning, and I certainly learnt how the physically handicapped ofyen have to use their initiative to do seemingly simple tasks!
|
28 Feb 05, 10:16 PM
rubonrubber
UK(CB), 8 yrs
|
It could be used to good use two days away from cigs and I"m a non smoker. Good luck OrionM wrote:
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
I like the idea of keeping a sub in total bondage for a weekend and controlling everything that she can and can't do during that time. On arrival, she would be put into bondage - perhaps chains - that would allow her to move around but she would be unable to leave until she was released on the Sunday night. Perhaps a long chain leash would prevent her from reaching the front door! She would sometimes be allowed enough movement to be able to carry out tasks or commands, and at other times she might be tied so that she was totally immobile. Everything at all times would be controlled - her degree of mobility, how she was dressed, her food, her use of the bathroom, her sight and speech through intermittent use of blindfold and gag, and so on. Of course there would be periods of "play", but even when just sitting together chatting on the sofa, she would still be held in chains.
Naturally everything that happened during the weekend would be by mutual agreement because it's important to me that a sub is happy at all times. So it is not a "forced" confinement. (And appropriate safety precautions at night). But does bondage for its own sake strike any chords with others (almost a pun!)? Or perhaps many of you do this all the time?!
Any comments gratefully received.
|
|
1 Mar 05, 7:58 PM
Tanos
UK(M), 14 yrs
  |
OrionM wrote:
Hi. Not sure if I'm putting this in the right forum but ... I am interested in the use of bondage in the wider sense - not just in the bedroom, and its use for longer periods than just a typical "play" session. I wonder if anyone else feels similarly about this.
|
Yes!
|
(And appropriate safety precautions at night).
|
I think the way to deal with this is by trying to assess each risk. For example, is it likely enough that you'll be incapicitated, so you decide to leave them with a key in an envelope (which spoils some of the magic) rather than a mobile phone to call for help (which would be acutely embarrassing instead)?
Regards, Tanos
|
1 Mar 05, 10:02 PM
Tanos
UK(M), 14 yrs
|
OrionM wrote:
Hi Tanos! I guess I wasn't imagining leaving the sub totally alone in the house when in bondage, but I guess that some Doms might. In an emergency the Dom might not be in an area of mobile reception, or able to return quick enough. So the key in an envelope might be the safer option if a Dom were to leave them?
|
"Call for help" as in ring for an ambulance if you have a heart attack / fall down stairs etc even on the premises. People come up with arguments about even that not being reliable (what if there is a problem with the phone?), but you've really got to judge how likely the risks will be compounded (eg that Vodaphone has network problems the very day you happen to have a heart attack.) These risk assessments are very like the thought processes in extreme sports like rock climbing: what's the risk of the guy you depend on the other end of the rope having a heart attack
while you're depending on him etc etc. Tanos
|
1 Mar 05, 10:10 PM
gimpneil
UK(DN), 7 yrs
|
I understand the whole aruguement about making sure a sub is ok, I would never allow myself to be left along (if I could help it), rest is just common sense, however it does strike of over reaction as any of the horror seanrios you though up could happen in a 5 minutes long scene. You have to know where to draw the line and say "Ok we cant plan this any more" as you will never remove all the things that could go wrong, just the most likly things.
So yes key in enevlope works.
Thanks for the thread it proving to be a big turn on as this is my ideal fantasy. |
1 Mar 05, 11:14 PM
daitchen
UK(SE), 9 yrs |
Tanos wrote:
OrionM wrote:
Hi Tanos! I guess I wasn't imagining leaving the sub totally alone in the house when in bondage, but I guess that some Doms might. In an emergency the Dom might not be in an area of mobile reception, or able to return quick enough. So the key in an envelope might be the safer option if a Dom were to leave them?
|
"Call for help" as in ring for an ambulance if you have a heart attack / fall down stairs etc even on the premises. People come up with arguments about even that not being reliable (what if there is a problem with the phone?), but you've really got to judge how likely the risks will be compounded (eg that Vodaphone has network problems the very day you happen to have a heart attack.) These risk assessments are very like the thought processes in extreme sports like rock climbing: what's the risk of the guy you depend on the other end of the rope having a heart attack
while you're depending on him etc etc. Tanos
|
From my own experience, the knowledge that there's a key to hand would certainly spoil the magic, you are right, Tanos!
I do like the idea of being left alone in long-term bondage - but not out of all communication with the Dom. For the already discussed safety reasons, and also because I wouldn't like to feel that I was completely out of his thoughts, I suppose.
By the way, I wonder if anyone has ever heard of something like this actually happening in real life - sub being left unable to extricate her/himself becuase of demise or illness of the Dom? |
