There is already an existing thread about this topic. Please post new replies there.
This post is on the Website help web board.
| Wed 4 Jan 12, 3:40 PM CookieMonster UK, 6 yrs |
IMO if someone objects to fucktards on the grounds of decency but finds Liberal Democunts OK they are no longer fit to run a group. Having a certain standard I could accept except others appear to express themselves in more courser terms. It is at least hypocracy at worst a vendetta(I am guessing the former). Is this an issue for website help? It is imo to easy to say "Go and start your own group", what if someone was messing with you on IC and the response was "go and start your own BDSM website" ? The issue here is abuse of position/power. Using "banned words" which seem to be judged on the hoof and not consistent to any principles but ofending the group leaders sensibilities. Neither is it an AUP Violation. I have been threatened with being banned for it by PM, smacks of old Soviet Political Commisars. | |
| 4 Jan 12, 3:43 PM Admin UK, 14 yrs |
We're not going to step in just because you can't get your own way with a group owner. Admin
Remember: it's only a website |