You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Shock Collars (52)

This post is on the SM/Bondage/Fetish web board.

29 Dec 11, 2:25 AM
mrboo
UK(ME), 11 yrs

not kill but send the right shock to the spine cord and the person could come to harm. But No play is 100% safe just like crossing the road.

Want good virgin sex? Once in a life time offer.

29 Dec 11, 11:07 PM
Slave_628_371_657
UK(N), 19 mths
Thank you all for you time and knowledge, there is a lot of information here and consideration that I didn't have before! Thank you again!

628-371-657

29 Dec 11, 11:46 PM
Ironsmith
UK(CW), 8 yrs

ocimum_sanctum wrote:
ii. is there enough energy in a suitable battery to kill someone, if you do something stupid.

To answer ii., empirical evidence strongly suggests it is easy enough to build a lethal device with only a "suitable" battery. For example, most stun guns use bog-standard 9V batteries, and from the only reference I can find a Taser M26 uses 8xAA batteries. The same reference puts the output potential at 50kV, which is roughly in range with most stun guns (they tend to use two step-up transformers from what I can tell). Now, given there are references documenting over 500 deaths as contributed to by Tasers in the US alone, I think it is only fair to surmise that you can indeed kill someone with a simple circuit and a few batteries.

Your quoted typical discharge of 100V may be what is used in these shock-collars but a stun gun will use significantly higher potential; the skin has a non-linear impedance in relation to potential and over 1000V, impedance can be surprisingly low, and there is also usually an oscillator involved so I wouldn't be surprised if you could induce problems with cardiac rhythm. Having said that, it would almost certainly have to be by deliberate action or design and is not the subject of the OP, but leopard99 does appear to be correct in his assertion.

Agreed.

" the skin has a non-linear impedance in relation to potential and over 1000V, impedance can be surprisingly low "

My understanding is that at those voltages, the bulk resistance can be as low as a few ohms. But, again, I would stress that the current path is highly significant. Most of these devices have electrodes placed only a few centimetres apart, which will inflict severe local pain but will not pass significant current through the central body mass.

// there is also usually an oscillator involved so I wouldn't be surprised if you could induce problems with cardiac rhythm. //

To get step-up with a low-mass transformer the frequency is going to be relatively high, and the critical frequency for VF is around 56 Hz. Transformers which operate in that range are impractically bulky and heavy for a wearable device delivering any useful amount of energy.

// it would almost certainly have to be by deliberate action or design //

Indeed. But since such devices are intended to deliver a non-lethal shock to a dog where the body mass is typically significantly less than an adult human, I would assert that the consequences of harm under normal conditions to a HEALTHY adult human from such a unit are minimal.

We've all got to die of something; if it's (and this is IMPORTANT) consensual, I personally don't see the risk as being any greater than (for example) breath play etc., which admittedly I know very little about.

There are many aspects of BDSM that can go wrong and cause harm.

30 Dec 11, 4:24 AM
ocimum_sanctum
UK(EH), 2 yrs
Ironsmith wrote:

" the skin has a non-linear impedance in relation to potential and over 1000V, impedance can be surprisingly low "

My understanding is that at those voltages, the bulk resistance can be as low as a few ohms. But, again, I would stress that the current path is highly significant. Most of these devices have electrodes placed only a few centimetres apart, which will inflict severe local pain but will not pass significant current through the central body mass.

Yes, but the question was not of whether it was likely - it isn't - but whether it was possible, which it seemingly is.

Ironsmith wrote:
// there is also usually an oscillator involved so I wouldn't be surprised if you could induce problems with cardiac rhythm. //

To get step-up with a low-mass transformer the frequency is going to be relatively high, and the critical frequency for VF is around 56 Hz. Transformers which operate in that range are impractically bulky and heavy for a wearable device delivering any useful amount of energy.

Well, Taser seem to manage fairly near that frequency, not sure what circuit layout they use though. I've managed to find decent specs on their X26 device.

It appears to be labelled X26 as the output is in the region of 26W. Anyway, the important part is the 50kV is not what's used when discharging into the body but rather <6kV and probably more around 1500V ad it delivers 19 pulses sec^-1 over 5secs with each pulse looking rather similar to a sinc function (which is quite telling).

In any instance, 56Hz may be an optimal frequency for causing VF but that is not to say it is the only frequency that will cause it... the heart does not conform to an ideal tuned circuit. Nor is VF the only manner in which electricity can cause cardiac problems, or for that matter cause injury.

So in lieu of finding more genearlised examples, are we willing to concede that one *can* build a circuit that runs off bog-standard batteries that is capable of causing injury?

Ironsmith wrote:
// it would almost certainly have to be by deliberate action or design //

Indeed. But since such devices are intended to deliver a non-lethal shock to a dog where the body mass is typically significantly less than an adult human, I would assert that the consequences of harm under normal conditions to a HEALTHY adult human from such a unit are minimal.

That is precisely the reason I distinguished between the two scenarios and already stated that it would be highly unlikely for one of these shock collars to cause an injury.

The question of whether it is *possible* to cause damage from suitable batteries in certain types of circuit is a different question, and yes, it is possible if one builds circuit for that purpose.

Ironsmith wrote:
We've all got to die of something; if it's (and this is IMPORTANT) consensual, I personally don't see the risk as being any greater than (for example) breath play etc., which admittedly I know very little about.

There are many aspects of BDSM that can go wrong and cause harm.

Oh, I definitely agree on that respect: we're more likely to die from suicide or a road accident by several orders of magnitude as compared against a BDSM related incident.

However, the leopard999's statement was that it is possible to cause injury with suitable batteries and a circuit, different from the OP.

--
Never make a decision when you need to pee.

30 Dec 11, 8:54 AM
rubberroy
UK(TN), 6 yrs
cheekyandtrouble wrote:
Shock collars are great and OMG they can give alot of shock.

I have one which I got off ebay for around £20. It vibrates, whistles and has the shock. It has 100 levels for the vibrate and shock.

I wear it on my thigh as round the neck isnt the safest of places.

I love it but also really hate it as the Dominant has the remote and the full control over it and even them getting ready to pick it up makes me behave, or correct the wrong that I was doing.

Thay are banned in pet shops as they are cruel to animals.

But you also want to watch out that you dont get the ones that are anti bark as that wont work on us subs :p

I've never heard a sub bark so they must work!

Supplier of classic motor omnibuses for weddings and all sorts of events in the south of England.

30 Dec 11, 9:01 AM
rubberroy
UK(TN), 6 yrs
Seeing this post reminds me of the sub who was secured at e-stimmed at a club in Vauxhall a few years back. The control box was wired to one of those rubber tubes that go across the road to count the traffic. the road was quite busy and the sub never knew when the next car would go past...another time, it was wired to the door bell!

Supplier of classic motor omnibuses for weddings and all sorts of events in the south of England.

30 Dec 11, 3:16 PM
Beau_Tox
UK(CB), 7 yrs


bohnanza wrote:
Each year more people die switching off their alarm clock than do from the amazingly dangerous BDSM.

Do you have evidential proof of that statement?

We really like cheese, we like Zeppelins. WE LIKE THE MOON!

30 Dec 11, 5:58 PM
Talisker
UK(OX), 12 yrs

I am sure that B. will provide an excellent reference for you, but you could look here ?

Mortality Statistics: Deaths registered in England and Wales (Series DR), 2010

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-refere...

The 2011 edition will be out soon I suspect.

My ancient computer does not use Excel (required to open the data-table).

It is surely very very likely however, that domestic fatalities listed will only include a fraction, a minimal number of deaths attributed to BDSM.

Natural causes, strokes, heart attacks, sudden death in sleep, you name it..you are more likely to die in your own bed than in a Dungeon.

T.

30 Dec 11, 6:17 PM
LadyLouella
UK(W), 2 yrs
£
I am looking forward to satellite technology combining with remote controlled "zapping", so that if a slave across the other side of the world in the US or Hong Kong is misbehaving, I can zap him from the UK. For the record, I think better to have these dog collar contraptions around the thigh, or similar specialised Electrical stimulation devices around the cock, rather than the neck. Because a) it gets rid of some additional risk, and b) its more fun for Mistress anyway.

I have all kinds of fancy electrics including remote controlled for my fun, but yesterday I purchased a generic brand Fetish Fantasy series Shock Therapy Cock Cage recommended by a gay guy who runs a BDSM shop, and it was actually surprisngly good for a cheap 60 pound device. (Me having previously spent literally a thousand pounds on various other electrics equipment). It wraps around the cock in leather with metal studs, attached to a cord rather than completeley remote controlled like my other unit. And is reversible so you can use the handpiece, reverse the current, and put it underneath the testicles or anywhere. Brilliant! Gay BDSM guys always seem to have great tips. It's a stereotype I know, but it holds.

31 Dec 11, 1:19 PM
tallpaul69
UK, 15 mths
LadyLouella wrote:
I am looking forward to satellite technology combining with remote controlled "zapping", so that if a slave across the other side of the world in the US or Hong Kong is misbehaving, I can zap him from the UK. For the record, I think better to have these dog collar contraptions around the thigh, or similar specialised Electrical stimulation devices around the cock, rather than the neck. Because a) it gets rid of some additional risk, and b) its more fun for Mistress anyway.

I have all kinds of fancy electrics including remote controlled for my fun, but yesterday I purchased a generic brand Fetish Fantasy series Shock Therapy Cock Cage recommended by a gay guy who runs a BDSM shop, and it was actually surprisngly good for a cheap 60 pound device. (Me having previously spent literally a thousand pounds on various other electrics equipment). It wraps around the cock in leather with metal studs, attached to a cord rather than completeley remote controlled like my other unit. And is reversible so you can use the handpiece, reverse the current, and put it underneath the testicles or anywhere. Brilliant! Gay BDSM guys always seem to have great tips. It's a stereotype I know, but it holds.

Although its probably aimed at entry and mid level players its a great little unit-Honour currently have it on offer at a very sensible price (their part number X2467)

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC