Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Unable to handle answers ( 4 ) (95)

This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.

This post is on the Other BDSM web board.

17 Dec 11, 5:42 PM
pilsburyDB
19 mths

tbh her views aren't that odd its just she's a little nore vocal and candid than most.....

to quote a friend "I have no desire to copulate with giant wobbling fatsacks"

17 Dec 11, 5:46 PM
spankee_1
UK(BH), 8 yrs

Who you define as an idiot might be someone else's perfect partner...

XmAshUK wrote:

spankee_1 wrote:
Can you not see the more you are responding the more she is coming back...the only way to stop this is to stop responding, so will everyone just stop and put an end to this most ridiculous posting I have ever seen!!!!!

Cool. I'll leave her alone, I promise.

But is this really the way it should be ? There should be a better mechanism for dealing with idiots, rather than just letting them get away with it, surely.

17 Dec 11, 5:47 PM
fellatrix
UK, 2 yrs

I think that depends very much on the context in which it is used.

But since english isn't his first language (he speaks 'strine') I'll make allowances for him.

ClassAct2005 wrote:
If a man says tits and arse he's not likely to be suitable for a good few women. Vocabulary helps us determine whether someone is likely to fit in with us and I don't mean fit his penis in a vagina. I mean fit in in other senses.

fell_a_tree wrote:
I must admit, tits and arse are not terms i would have considered using before I met my master. I'm so much better than him but he's dragging me down.

smartarse

17 Dec 11, 5:51 PM
Prussian_blue
UK(ST), 10 mths

XmAshUK wrote:
But is this really the way it should be ? There should be a better mechanism for dealing with idiots, rather than just letting them get away with it, surely.

Acquire some tolerance perhaps?

I really don't have a problem with anything posted by her and see nothing to get so worked up over. She's seeking a particular type of person as we all are, or shall we pretend that such liaisons are not the done thing in here?

Having a list of preferences isn't a thought crime, I've seen more than one girl state requirements for attractiveness and suffer none of the abuse CA does.

Exactly what does a rich person have in common with a poor one? Almost nothing. I have to wonder if the people who believe otherwise actually know any millionaires.

17 Dec 11, 6:15 PM
lilybee

UK(TN), 5 yrs

Blooming heck they started a thread number 5!

lily
If what I have written above makes no sense then just ignore me, normal service will be resumed one day.

18 Dec 11, 1:33 PM
DrTaps
AQ, 10 yrs

CannaLilyBeeForYule wrote:
Blooming heck they started a thread number 5!

Surely not. Is this a record?