You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

The public face of BDSM? (73)

This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.

22 Dec 11, 11:28 AM
Platinum
UK(W), 9 yrs
emark wrote:
Does anyone use this site anyway? I can't find a single Google hit for maltracker or maltracker.com other than the site itself, even if I remove all the keywords to do with knees and patellas...

Well a little closer to home

http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/321281/

@angellover blogged about it which is where the OP may have seen it, perhaps you should ask her about this site?

ETA given the lack of real identity for the OP my suspicion is this a score settler from a disgruntled ex representative jealous of the success of those currently in the media eye.

P

Edited 22 Dec 11, 11:37 AM by Platinum

22 Dec 11, 11:32 AM
shit_sub
UK(W), 5 yrs
Belasarius wrote:
It's a job that we need

Oh yes?

Why?

22 Dec 11, 11:36 AM
ClassAct2005
UK(N), 7 yrs
I think it's so hard to explain my type of BDSM and the mental side to people who aren't made that way and I feel so lacking in any desire that anyone needs to know anyway.
22 Dec 11, 11:44 AM
hollythedolly
UK(NN), 2 yrs


Platinum wrote:
emark wrote:
Does anyone use this site anyway? I can't find a single Google hit for maltracker or maltracker.com other than the site itself, even if I remove all the keywords to do with knees and patellas...

Well a little closer to home

http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/321281/

@angellover blogged about it which is where the OP may have seen it, perhaps you should ask her about this site?

ETA given the lack of real identity for the OP my suspicion is this a score settler from a disgruntled ex representative jealous of the success of those currently in the media eye.

I actually find this disturbing not the outing of the person but has Max clifford given his consent to having his e-mail's published on a bdsm website.

If i was the @admin of this site i would seriously be looking into if max clifford is ok with it. As i really wouldn't want to be locked in a courtroom battle with him as i think IC would no longer exsist.

and the AUP says you cant name and shame this does even though he isn't a member on the website

22 Dec 11, 11:48 AM
Muzzlehatch
UK(TN), 7 yrs

ConsciousnessJunkie wrote:

Most of all I find that whenever I see someone being interviewed they are inevitably either a long-since-gone-grey "master" or a professional "dominatrix". You never see just ordinary young people (like myself I guess) talking about their involvements. People speaking out always seem to be such extremists too. 24/7 d/s or hammering nails through their nobs for pain.

You never see the less mainstream/extreme kinky people represented, which I would have thought would be the perfect place to start. After all, everyones a little bit kinky and can relate to that. But even as someone who is a long term kinkster, I find many of the people that parade around "coming out" as a little bit of a grotesque caricature.

So how does this fit with your arguement?

Owner of The Croppery Dungeon and Breakfast. Organises The St Leonards munch.

22 Dec 11, 11:54 AM
wonderer
UK, 5 yrs

dirtylittlecunt wrote:
Belasarius wrote:
It's a job that we need

Oh yes?

Why?

I think governments and employers and other non-kink organisations (and even parents) find it harder to vilify and prohibit kink if there's a degree of public discussion and public acceptance. Getting the message out there will often involve compromise of various sorts but I think it's still worthwhile.

Perhaps this is what @Belasarius meant. Perhaps he'll spot this and clarify.

"Wisdom begins in wonder” (Socrates)
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" (Albert Einstein)
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/

22 Dec 11, 12:06 PM
ClassAct2005
UK(N), 7 yrs
I would imagine there was no consent to the reproduction of his emails.

hollythedolly wrote:
Platinum wrote:
emark wrote:
Does anyone use this site anyway? I can't find a single Google hit for maltracker or maltracker.com other than the site itself, even if I remove all the keywords to do with knees and patellas...

Well a little closer to home

http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/321281/

@angellover blogged about it which is where the OP may have seen it, perhaps you should ask her about this site?

ETA given the lack of real identity for the OP my suspicion is this a score settler from a disgruntled ex representative jealous of the success of those currently in the media eye.

I actually find this disturbing not the outing of the person but has Max clifford given his consent to having his e-mail's published on a bdsm website.

If i was the @admin of this site i would seriously be looking into if max clifford is ok with it. As i really wouldn't want to be locked in a courtroom battle with him as i think IC would no longer exsist.

and the AUP says you cant name and shame this does even though he isn't a member on the website

22 Dec 11, 12:22 PM
Attitude_Adjuster
UK(N), 6 yrs

Errr. Hold on.

How did the email to Max Clifford become in the public domain unless either the sender or Max (well max's agency staff) sent it to someone else?

ClassAct2005 wrote:
I would imagine there was no consent to the reproduction of his emails.

hollythedolly wrote:
Platinum wrote:
emark wrote:
Does anyone use this site anyway? I can't find a single Google hit for maltracker or maltracker.com other than the site itself, even if I remove all the keywords to do with knees and patellas...

Well a little closer to home

http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/321281/

@angellover blogged about it which is where the OP may have seen it, perhaps you should ask her about this site?

ETA given the lack of real identity for the OP my suspicion is this a score settler from a disgruntled ex representative jealous of the success of those currently in the media eye.

I actually find this disturbing not the outing of the person but has Max clifford given his consent to having his e-mail's published on a bdsm website.

If i was the @admin of this site i would seriously be looking into if max clifford is ok with it. As i really wouldn't want to be locked in a courtroom battle with him as i think IC would no longer exsist.

and the AUP says you cant name and shame this does even though he isn't a member on the website

And all men kill the thing they love, By all let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!

22 Dec 11, 12:29 PM
emark
UK, 9 yrs
hollythedolly wrote:
I actually find this disturbing not the outing of the person but has Max clifford given his consent to having his e-mail's published on a bdsm website.

If i was the @admin of this site i would seriously be looking into if max clifford is ok with it. As i really wouldn't want to be locked in a courtroom battle with him as i think IC would no longer exsist.

You mean maltracker.com? I don't see anything on IC.

I also don't see any emails from Max Clifford, but one speaking on behalf of him. I'm not sure that reproducing emails is necessarily illegal depending on the situation, and I'm not sure why they would care about reproduction of a perfectly ordinary email that simply shows them giving a form we're-not-interested reply. This Jason however may well have more cause for complaint, especially if the allegations made are misleading or untrue...

Sign the Consenting Adult Action Network's statement

22 Dec 11, 12:35 PM
hollythedolly
UK(NN), 2 yrs


emark wrote:
hollythedolly wrote:
I actually find this disturbing not the outing of the person but has Max clifford given his consent to having his e-mail's published on a bdsm website.

If i was the @admin of this site i would seriously be looking into if max clifford is ok with it. As i really wouldn't want to be locked in a courtroom battle with him as i think IC would no longer exsist.

You mean maltracker.com? I don't see anything on IC.

I also don't see any emails from Max Clifford, but one speaking on behalf of him. I'm not sure that reproducing emails is necessarily illegal depending on the situation, and I'm not sure why they would care about reproduction of a perfectly ordinary email that simply shows them giving a form we're-not-interested reply. This Jason however may well have more cause for complaint, especially if the allegations made are misleading or untrue...

I would be seriously pissed off if a third party reproduced my e-mails. But this how i cam across @mailtracker.com on the writing of someone's weblog writing which then produces a link from mailtracker

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC