You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2

How sad, to see only in black and white ... (10)

wonderer's profile

Replies

30 Nov 11, 11:34 AM
bohnanza
UK(FK), 12 yrs

wonderer wrote:
I've never heard of lack of 3-D perception, but I can imagine it might be awkward.

It is more common that you would think. I was at a talk the other week by a chap working on hologram displays and he revealed 3% of the population cannot see in 3D at all. Some, like me, from birth, others due to illness/accident. 24% of people can't see the 3D in films using the 3D glasses you get in cinemas.

It isn't awkward at all. Apart from parking I have never found it a problem, though it may explain why I never won Wimbledon. Sometimes it is of use. When I look through a microscope I can see things in 3D, or what my brain interprets as 3D.

I have the perfect accent for conflict resolution, shame about the personality.

30 Nov 11, 8:41 PM
wonderer
UK, 5 yrs

With great reluctance I've decided to hide some responses which were off topic.

The suggestion was made that my OP was an extended metaphor about cheating, in an attempt at self justification.

The thought behind the blog was indeed partly triggered by a few posts on recent threads about how some people see things in black and white, (as well as by some of my occasional readings in cognitive psychology) but the weblog isn't about trying to prove a point, nor to respond to them directly, nor is it an extended metaphor. It is simply musings on colour perception, triggered by but not responding to those posts.

And as I said in the OP, I'd rather any discussion keep on topic and as courteous as possible, rather than bringing up potentially inflammatory subjects.

"Wisdom begins in wonder” (Socrates)
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" (Albert Einstein)
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/

Edited 30 Nov 11, 8:44 PM by wonderer

10 Feb 12, 9:20 AM
kinkyclover
UK(NG), 4 yrs

Just spotted this now, so apologies for not responding sooner. In response to your comment on my images, the main reason I choose to produce monochrome images, or rather that I don't produce colour images (although I have from time to time depending on the image) is that I feel leaving the colour out of an image creates more of a mystery to the image.

With the addition of high contrast, dark shadows and a lack of colour, the viewer has to fill the rest in. I know, the effort of using ones imagination.. sigh! lol! But I think an image is so much more powerful when your mind has to fill in the blanks, plus I think there is more of an appeal there as each image can be personalised somewhat.

I know I fail to achieve this in the majority of my images, but am doing it more and more. This is the road I wish to travel. But brightly light images where everything is put on front of you does not appeal to me at all.

My 2c ;-)

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC