This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board.
| Fri 28 Oct 11, 10:40 PM Visualize UK(CV), 5 yrs  |
and if so, to what degree? | ||
| 29 Oct 11, 11:03 AM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs   |
Eh? "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness | ||
| 29 Oct 11, 11:07 AM MsTrixzenaz 8 mths £  |
| ||
| 29 Oct 11, 5:20 PM Ms_Valentine UK, 9 yrs |
Anything which is consensual is acceptable in a broad sense as we all adhere to a policy of YKIOK. So, if a man consensually decides to give his money to a dominant woman as part of a bdsm connection between them, then it is moral because no one is being coerced, ripped off or hurt in a way they did not agree to. Men contact PDs and ask to be financially dominated. Let us be clear about that. The men contact the PDs of their own free will and ask if she will engage in a consensual bdsm activity with him.If she agrees, it is mutually consensual and therefore perfectly moral in any way I can judge. I personally don't engage in FD but that is my choice and has nothing to do with my believing those who do, either the PD or the sub are being immoral or doing anything wrong. Mistress of @paulss My PD blog at http://mistress-keene.blogspot.com/ http://twitter.com/#!/Mistress_Keene | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 12:18 AM subtler 3 yrs |
Like much kink, I guess this will depend a lot on the precise form it takes, and the direction of travel. A lot of findom advertising is pretty depressing & negative stuff, IMO, but only the people directly involved will really know what's going on (and sometimes not even them). If it does carry any risk to people's immortal souls, I expect this applies more to the dominant than the slave.
It is, after all, more blessed to give than to receive. Try. Just a little bit harder. | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 1:34 PM massado200  UK(LS), 8 yrs |
| ||
| 30 Oct 11, 3:23 PM Ms_Valentine UK, 9 yrs |
Have I missed something here? Can anything which occurs between informed and consenting adults be immoral. Immorality would only be an issue on IC if the participants were under age, not informed and/or not consenting. Anything else is really people trying to decide what is right for others. Presumably they would not like it for other people started asking if their kink was moral? Remember, I don't do FD but if others want to do it, then leave them alone and stop asking questions you wouldn't dare if it were any other form of dominant/submissive interaction. Mistress of @paulss My PD blog at http://mistress-keene.blogspot.com/ http://twitter.com/#!/Mistress_Keene | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 3:27 PM condemned UK(M), 11 yrs |
Hear hear Ms Valentine! If someone has an idea,however detrimental to themselves and another finds it a buzz to make that idea reality,why the hell not?? Damn i have gotten myself into worse detrimental arrangements than losing a bit of money,lol! | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 3:34 PM Ms_Valentine UK, 9 yrs |
Yep, like it or not that is what we sign up for on here. We have to respect others choices as expect others to do for our own. I would imagine that those into FD don't see it as losing a bit of money but instead see it as getting their bdsm kicks via giving some money away. Not my cup of tea but no sillier than getting pain, using one's limited time in the service of another or getting one's doses of misery. Mistress of @paulss My PD blog at http://mistress-keene.blogspot.com/ http://twitter.com/#!/Mistress_Keene | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 3:37 PM condemned UK(M), 11 yrs |
Ha ha...touche! | ||
| 30 Oct 11, 4:33 PM MrBromley UK(EN), 3 yrs |
The only issue that I could see is if the sub is getting into debt because of this. But the sub could easily also get into debt through excessive gambling for example. I doubt that any domme would want to do permanent physical damage to her sub and in the same way she would not want to go so far with financial domination that the sub basically bankrupts himself. A sub who cannot sub because he is physical incapable or cannot partake in findom because he has no money left is not going to be of any use to the mistress after all. My guess is that those subs who go on about financial domination probably run a mile as soon as it looks like it is costing them more than they want. |
