This topic has been continued on a new thread. Please post new replies there.
This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
| 29 Oct 11, 8:27 AM valleyrose17 UK(BS), 2 yrs |
I don't think you can call it a coincidence CA2005 - he made a choice - the choice to use what he had seen and live out the scene in real life.
"Fear is that little darkroom where negatives are developed" Michael Pritchard | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 8:32 AM valleyrose17 UK(BS), 2 yrs |
I switched off the local news the other day because the whole programme was dedicated to the verdict and i just KNEW it was going to get salacious (is that the right word). It was like watching half an hour of the News of the World live on TV Euw. They DID make it sound as if he had been watching snuff movies - I can't remeber the exact words but it was along the lines that he had been watching hours and hours of the strangulation of women.
"Fear is that little darkroom where negatives are developed" Michael Pritchard | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 11:18 AM rehtael_ni_dal UK(G), 9 yrs |
An interesting bit is that:- Nigel Lickley QC wanted Tabak's internet usage to be included in the Crown's case against him but this was blocked by Mr Justice Field and the jury was not told about it. Obviously the judge considered that the sites that Tabak visited was NOT relevant to the case. I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 1:33 PM Olokun UK(S), 5 yrs |
I had a similar thought on this, this morning. Wondered what kind of impact it would play on the scene, especially already having the violent pornography bill/act. It can only stand to make things much harder, or more we have to work hard to conceal what we do, even though 99.9% of the time it is innocent. | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 1:43 PM misunderstoodslave UK(OL), 2 yrs |
In my experience, Judges are less prurient than the rest of the professional world, ie the bar and social workers in particular. But today's Guardian made me very cross, by describing the porn he watched (presumably sex and submission site) as "disturbing." I think we forget how odd a lot (most?) of people find the whole being beaten thing. I would still have thought the Guardian might have made the distinction about consensual strangulation/violence and nonconsensual, though. I'm disappointed. The hilarious thing about the kink.com sites is those bits at the end with smiling girls in dressing gowns saying how happy they are to have done it. Presumably done for legal reasons, but it is quite funny. But prurience is universal. No one more prurient than me, tbh. Long may it reign. Though it's v hard if you only get your fix from the Guardian or occasional trips to the hairdresser. You get out of the loop. | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 1:49 PM Clodmin UK(OX), 3 yrs |
She's not saying 'my what a coincidence!' She means coincidence as in 'the two things coincided'. They were concomitant, happened at the same time, overlapped, occurred in the same venue. The word has been expanded to mean random and unconnected but it still means the above. Although she actually wrote 'conicidence' which I don't think actually means anything, and I would suggest is either evidence of the dangers of glass-house-based stone throwing manoevres or a testament to the moreishness of a Vodka and Slimfast diet.
Here are some small words for you to look at. Aren't they tiny! | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 2:21 PM emark UK, 9 yrs |
How is this possible?? Surely all these images are now removed from society, thanks to the valiant work of Liz Longhurst?? How is it possible that someone now commit such acts???
And well, when you reduce the number of people into BDSM to the number of people into breath play, then to the number of people who like looking at such images, then factor out the people who don't care about laws for whatever reason even if they do, you're left with a lot of "It doesn't affect me, why should I care".
I also agree with the various comments here - I noticed that with the "extreme porn" law, the broadsheets and the BBC were doing as much if not more of the bad reporting, whilst even the Daily Mail had a columnist actually criticise the law. It's as if they don't even see it controversial to refer to images as "sick", and assume there would be universal agreement on the issue - there's an interesting BBC article at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/08/al... where they note the response from readers challenged their assumptions on this. (Sadly after this, the BBC often reverted to just publishing a pro-legislation article every time Longhurst opened her mouth, but at least they acknowledge the response at this point.)
Sign the Consenting Adult Action Network's statement Edited 29 Oct 11, 2:30 PM by emark | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 3:55 PM Jayen UK(GU), 9 yrs |
I wonder if VT had discovered fetish, whether it would have helped him understand and channel his desires, taught him that pornography is not wrong - and whether both he and JY would still have been walking around today? | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 4:00 PM valleyrose17 UK(BS), 2 yrs |
Maybe he had. How do we know he wasnt a member on here?
"Fear is that little darkroom where negatives are developed" Michael Pritchard | |||
| 29 Oct 11, 4:07 PM Jayen UK(GU), 9 yrs |
Interesting! |