You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Chastity device only comes off 5 times a year (48)

FemDom_forum's profile . FemDom_forum group posts

Posted by longhorn on Sun 23 Oct 11, 10:09 PM to the FemDom_forum group.

i showed my mistress an article from USA , its the one were you start by making your slave wear a chastity device for 3 mths to start with , the the device only comes of 5 times a year . this can be extended by your mistress. my mistress decided we would do it. i have now got 2 weeks to go until the device comes off. i have been so good my mistress has decided do it for real. i am now enjoying being her submissive slave , do any other mistresses do this ?

Replies

23 Oct 11, 10:48 PM
MistressStar
UK(TW), 5 yrs
I have a few chaste boys, two of which have done over 4 months without release - I have promised them both release at Christmas or New Year. Release consists of them bringing themself to orgasm, and then relocking.

The last time I allowed release, he lasted five minutes! :-D

~ It is always by way of pain one arrives at pleasure ~

24 Oct 11, 8:42 AM
Ms_Valentine
UK, 9 yrs
I play with chastity and orgasm control with different subs in various ways.

My own sub at home is not locked up for long periods but instead must be in the device whenever he is not with me. At work, out shopping or do hobbies except cycling when common sense dictates that the device and it will not be compatible.

Other subs, in my PD life are locked up for longer periods of time up to about a three month max ever.

I prefer chastity to be used as a method of locking away a well teased cock for shorter periods, then brought out and teased again and so on than just locking the cock up and forgetting about it. They still don't get to come but they are 'used' more and often seem more frustrated than those who are just locked up and left.

A Fine Norfolk Domme. Mistress of @paulss My PD blog at http://mistress-keene.blogspot.com/

28 Oct 11, 6:07 AM
Ms_Rika
US, 7 mths
When I see a statement like:
i have been so good my mistress has decided ...
It makes me cringe a little. Pride in how good you are when you're sexually frustrated is not very impressive. To me, serving is a commitment - it's not something you barter for...and it's not something you turn on or off based on your current state of frustration. Your service (or your behavior, in this case) doesn't improve because you're in chastity. It needs to be perfect at all times. What happens when you get out of chastity and have an orgasm? Does that mean you don't have to serve until you're horny again?

I also have played quite a bit with chastity with my subs. It's a great game and a fun set of toys. I too enjoy Tease and Denial - and have noticed the same phenomenon mentioned above - that a frequently teased and denied man is far more 'uncomfortable' than one that is locked and forgotten.

But the condition of being able to submit to me is that submission is unconditional.

- Rika

28 Oct 11, 6:59 AM
chartreuse
UK(BA), 6 yrs

Ms_Rika wrote:
When I see a statement like:
i have been so good my mistress has decided ...
It makes me cringe a little. Pride in how good you are when you're sexually frustrated is not very impressive. To me, serving is a commitment - it's not something you barter for...and it's not something you turn on or off based on your current state of frustration. Your service (or your behavior, in this case) doesn't improve because you're in chastity. It needs to be perfect at all times. What happens when you get out of chastity and have an orgasm? Does that mean you don't have to serve until you're horny again?

I also have played quite a bit with chastity with my subs. It's a great game and a fun set of toys. I too enjoy Tease and Denial - and have noticed the same phenomenon mentioned above - that a frequently teased and denied man is far more 'uncomfortable' than one that is locked and forgotten.

But the condition of being able to submit to me is that submission is unconditional.

Love it... couldn't agree more, it's what I have been saying for years but finding the man to "fit" my desires is not an easy task.

@The_Coven / @The_Problem_Page, you might give the advice that someone needs. / I want the "Moon on a stick and the Stars suspended from bunting". / So many haystacks, so few needles! / Conserve conversation and converse about conservation!

Edited 28 Oct 11, 7:13 AM by chartreuse

28 Oct 11, 7:53 AM
Ms_Valentine
UK, 9 yrs
chartreuse wrote:
Ms_Rika wrote:
When I see a statement like:
i have been so good my mistress has decided ...
It makes me cringe a little. Pride in how good you are when you're sexually frustrated is not very impressive. To me, serving is a commitment - it's not something you barter for...and it's not something you turn on or off based on your current state of frustration. Your service (or your behavior, in this case) doesn't improve because you're in chastity. It needs to be perfect at all times. What happens when you get out of chastity and have an orgasm? Does that mean you don't have to serve until you're horny again?

I also have played quite a bit with chastity with my subs. It's a great game and a fun set of toys. I too enjoy Tease and Denial - and have noticed the same phenomenon mentioned above - that a frequently teased and denied man is far more 'uncomfortable' than one that is locked and forgotten.

But the condition of being able to submit to me is that submission is unconditional.

Love it... couldn't agree more, it's what I have been saying for years but finding the man to "fit" my desires is not an easy task.

Yes, have to agree here. Submission, in my opinion, is the starting point and chastity is something which only works for me, if I know the sub could be equally well behaved without it.

Locking up naughty boys who can't stop wanking is boring to me. The submission I got would be fairly meaningless and 'bought' with force. It would not constitute submission from the whole person and certainly not from place where it mattered.

It is true that many subs do say their ability to serve is ruined by being allowed an orgasm as they are less horny and therefore 'less submissive'. I couldn't have a full time sub who was like that as it would mean I had to keep him chaste permanently which would be dull for me or accept periods of poor submission which would make me feel like a fraud and somewhat compromised.

Mistress of @paulss My PD blog at http://mistress-keene.blogspot.com/ http://twitter.com/#!/Mistress_Keene

28 Oct 11, 8:51 AM
BatteredBruisedWifey
UK(SW), 9 mths
Im only writing in this thread cause i wanna be near all these cuddly Dommes :-D Please don't tell my Lady She will kill me :-D

Dude its cool to be a submissive from your heart & a horny submissive. I know my Lady loves me being lovingly subservient to Her (in every possible way) & getting turned on by Her. There are times im such a randy sub :-p Most of the time im just wanting to see Her content, happy, peaceful, smiley ... else i know whats coming :-D

Just being at that happy balance with a woman.

28 Oct 11, 1:14 PM
Miss_OL
UK(YO), 6 yrs
Ms_Valentine wrote:

Locking up naughty boys who can't stop wanking is boring to me. The submission I got would be fairly meaningless and 'bought' with force. It would not constitute submission from the whole person and certainly not from place where it mattered.

Exactly.

Yet so many male subs seem to think this is what locked chastity is all about.

I find the gap between my views on chastity and male subs' views on chastity, is about as wide as it can be at times.

Put me on a pedestal, but be there to catch me if I fall.

Edited 28 Oct 11, 1:15 PM by Miss_OL

28 Oct 11, 3:10 PM
SublimeDecadence
UK(WR), 5 yrs

I agree with Ms_Rika, although I can't see how it's possible to generalise, we are all individuals and all relationships are different, they have different dynamics and protocols, different levels of power exchange and different concepts of what constitutes play and lifestyle

Being submissive within a long term relationship does not require chastity in my view. It does require a genuine need to surrender everything to one woman and for the female to take the lead and be dominant when she needs to be or simply because she wants it that way. In jargon terms TPE is just that - Total

I think chastity serves a different purpose altogether it allows the female to maintain her submissive in a state of near arousal 24/7 if she chooses. This in turn enhances his desire to serve and worship her 24/7… so, I think chastity will certainly enhance submission, but based on my limited experience it will not create it

'There's no such thing as a dirty book... it's just the way you read it" Alex Harvey

20 Nov 11, 3:43 PM
Ruas_cs
UK(NE), 17 mths
Presently I've been locked by my Mistress for seven weeks. She allowed me forty eight hours out of the cock cage a few days back, but I wasn't allowed to cum. I can vouch for that being hugely frustrating and teasing, even more so when the chastity belt went back on without having had release.
23 Nov 11, 8:23 AM
BatteredBruisedWifey
UK(SW), 9 mths
Why does this remind me of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh4yp07UKEg

:-D

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC