Posted by MsTrixzenaz
on Wed 19 Oct 11, 8:26 AM to MsTrixzenaz's blog.
While exchanging messages with another supposedly female on another site yesterday, she mentioned in passing that she had 12 year old daughter who was aware of her involvement in the bdsm scene and shared her interest in fetish dressing. In spite of me informing her that there was no way I would contemplete involving myself in any scene where a minor was even present, the messages took an uncomfortable turn, seeming to concentrate on the child possibly sitting on another males lap while dressed in fetish gear.Obviously, the exchange of messages ceased then and there. My point is, could this type of message form some sort of possible entrapment by the law enforcement agencies and has anyone else experienced a similar exchange of message on this or other sites?
| 19 Oct 11, 8:33 AM summberblues UK(LS), 7 yrs |
Did you actually varify that the person you were talking to was actually female, as it could have just been a male pretending and trying to live out a sick fantasy. | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 8:48 AM MsTrixzenaz 8 mths £ |
| |||
| 19 Oct 11, 9:03 AM summberblues UK(LS), 7 yrs |
No for it to be one of these stings it would have to be you that would iniate the conversation about minors in that way. | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 10:04 AM tallulahme UK, 2 yrs |
This sounds unbelievably like a conversation that we had recently (ish) with someone from another site. We were all getting along famously when the conversation took a twist in exactly this direction. Instantly we decided that the person/persons involved were incredibly dangerous and we stopped communication there and then, and made very effective use of the block facility. My conclusion was that this person was probably just a paedophile getting their jollies by talking about some fantasy (lets hope it was a fantasy)! I am not sure that I went to the paranoid lengths of believing it was entrapment, but as we had done nothing to provoke or indulge this fantasy we were perfectly in the clear. As has been made apparent by quite a few blogs this week the whole "your kink" thing can on occasion be quite abhorrent especially when it can neither be consensual or legal! Do you have to be the ice queen intellectual OR the slut-whore? Isn't there some way to be both? | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 10:26 AM MsTrixzenaz 8 mths £ |
Thankyou for your input. I trust I did not come across as paranoid but I hail from a continent where we have an almost inbred distrust of some federal agencies. | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 12:00 PM prettyPETunia UK(WS), 4 yrs |
If love is blind I need to find a cane | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 4:29 PM Kitty_Fantastico UK(OX), 2 yrs |
There are several spanking sites where this type of thing is really common. When I use to go on them reguarly I was always fending off and blocking people who wanted to discuss spanking children (not just memories...but wouldn't you like to spank the teenager next door...or the school girl etc). Made me feel quite sick and angry...and I no longer visit those sites. I've had something similar only once on this site....but it does seem to be very common and almost accepted within the spanking online scene. I would just be secure in the knowledge you didn't take part and blocked them and forget about it. | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 5:47 PM Crystal_Eyes UK, 5 yrs |
I sincerely doubt that the police would do anything without solid proof (a real name, email address, print-outs of the messages, etc). However, I'd strongly recommend that you report it to the site owner(s) immediately (if you haven't done so already), making sure you include any of the messages exchanged to back up your complaint. ETA: In answer to your original question, my understanding is that even if it *was* a case of police using this tactic to attempt to 'catch out' paedophiles, any information gleaned would be inadmissible in court. I do find it highly unlikely that this is the case, though. ------------------------------------------ Edited 19 Oct 11, 6:03 PM by Crystal_Eyes | |||
| 19 Oct 11, 6:33 PM MsTrixzenaz 8 mths £ |
Thankyou for the rider to your comment as I am unsure how the British law functions in this aspect. It is reassuring. |