This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
| Mon 10 Oct 11, 11:43 PM Ludovic UK, 5 yrs  |
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2047651/... So if this goes through and when lots opt in, will they finally STFU? Or will they start on to the police to visit the homes to ensure there's no computer access in kids rooms? Ludo Edited Mon 10 Oct 11, 11:47 PM by Ludovic | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:00 AM Juantastic UK(CH), 22 mths  |
I've already put K9 web protection on our little 'uns PC, even though he doesn't know how to navigate off the CBBC and Nickelodeon websites yet. I'm rather pleased with it as a product, but it does highlight some of the problems that are always going to plague content restriction. For example, how do you categorise image hosting sites that allow adult material? If you allow them, then some porn will get through, but if you don't, then your kid's going to get a red X where there should be a picture of Spongebob. The opt-out Internet filtering, I can live with. We already have it on our mobile phones, after all. To date, I've had to opt out of content filtering on O2, Voda and T-Mobile, though not on Three as I recall. For people who treat computers purely as consumer electronics, external filtering is a sensible catch-all. For those who don't have kids or who are prepared to take responsibility for what their children do on their computers, there's always the option to have filtering removed. Edited 11 Oct 11, 12:01 AM by Juantastic | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:04 AM Mona_Demarkov HR, 7 yrs |
More importantly, how can we protect our children from the Daily Mail? Edited 11 Oct 11, 12:06 AM by Mona_Demarkov | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:06 AM MisstressvsSolicedog UK(NN), 17 mths |
Here Here ,,, newsagents should be closed down if there within 200 yards of a school Please excuse crap spelling cause i,m rubbish | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:06 AM Tanos  UK(M), 14 yrs   |
... and the filth it pumps out every day regardless of its effect on innocent children: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-204... (especially ones subjected to Orlando Bloom's gurning face if you scroll down.) :T: Edited 11 Oct 11, 12:07 AM by Tanos | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:08 AM MisstressvsSolicedog UK(NN), 17 mths |
never mind we will still be able access all the grafic violence, mutilation,disembowlment etc etc we want after all,,, killing and maiming fine apparently Please excuse crap spelling cause i,m rubbish | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:08 AM susanCD UK(LL), 2 yrs |
| |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:10 AM Mona_Demarkov HR, 7 yrs |
Ah, THAT is the face of a man protecting his children right there... | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:11 AM Janie_0 UK(G), 8 yrs |
The gutter press at it's very best. These papers should join the NOTW. | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:14 AM MisstressvsSolicedog UK(NN), 17 mths |
Actually,, this could backfire on them,,, imagine a person getting a new contract so many do,, that look at porn sites,,, well there will be a bloody lot who will,,a large amount im sure will yes we want it,,, regardless of what the DailyBastard says,, And how many people who feel infringed by this will take thier bussiness elsewhere i wonder,,, this crap will turn out intresting at least
Please excuse crap spelling cause i,m rubbish | |
| 11 Oct 11, 12:14 AM Ludovic UK, 5 yrs |
Should teachers who want to watch depraved pornography be allowed access to our children? I think NOT! I propose we match our ISP records of sordid adults with the GTC list of teachers and strike off any matches! This is the thin end of the wedgie! |
