This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.
| Sun 9 Oct 11, 11:21 PM kirsty_m 18 mths  |
i know there's been loads of conversations about training subs... but having chatted to fellow subs, we have decided there needs to be some instructions on how to train your Dom... cos i don't know about all you other girls out there, but sometimes they are just pains in the butt (and not in a good way), they take us for granted, and leave us waiting around for far too long. Should we start a subs union and demand certain standards? Threaten to strike? Or are there more subtle ways of getting what we want?
i look forward to your suggestions kirsty x | ||
| 9 Oct 11, 11:28 PM twilightsilence UK(ME), 16 mths  |
Loving the idea of a union. We could carry cards, get t-shirts and everyfink 
Threatening to strike could be fun too I'm nowhere near as innocent as I look | ||
| 9 Oct 11, 11:30 PM WayneKing  UK(SE), 2 yrs |
Oh dear.
This could get lively. Please check out the Anthony Nolan register | ||
| 9 Oct 11, 11:30 PM kirsty_m 18 mths |
Matching T shirts!! yay great idea  | ||
| 9 Oct 11, 11:31 PM idonna UK(SM), 21 mths |
like "no sex" strike by Lysistrata  | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 12:03 AM Siglorel UK(RG), 11 mths |
I can hear the chants.... What do we want ...'to be used' When do we want it...'when Master desires' seriously...put it in a letter, in third person...and careful what you wish for... cheers Ian See worlds on worlds compose one universe, observe how system into system runs | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 1:31 AM Syroxx UK(NN), 2 yrs |
you forgot... in triplicate.
You're amazing, yes it's true. But without me, you're only you. | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 3:14 AM Top_Class UK(GU), 2 yrs |
Remove compatibility to sub and the toppy skills used by doms (which are pure techniques acquisition and can be managed through "go to a workshop" type solutions) and what's left reduces to a question of nature or nurture for domly disposition. If what you've got is someone perhaps ambivalent about and just wanting to give domming a go then there's probably no internal drive which is determining what they want to do and you may as well give them a script to follow and see if it floats their boat if it floats yours. But if what you've got is a dom for whom domming is a necessity for their personal sanity, health and satisfaction; domming which is desire-led then they're going to be doing it their way for their needs anyway while being focused on the search for the sub who'll enjoy being dommed that way too. No point training this type - you'll only spend a lot of time standing in a corner.
"Fork handles?" "No, not 'fork handles' ... four candles." | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 3:50 AM rehtael_ni_dal UK(G), 9 yrs |
There already is one @SubbieUnion
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 4:55 AM SinPar US, 12 yrs |
Thanks for this. I was looking for a good example of what has happened to the scene when vanilla values get dragged into the kink. This illustrates that about as well as I've ever seen done. I can only hope you're doing this with tongue planted firmly in cheek. On a more serious note, if you are sincere about your post-- If you're being taken for for granted and left waiting for contact- that may be handwriting on the proverbial wall. SinPar
-- The weak are the most treacherous of us all. They come to the strong and drain them. They are bottomless. They are insatiable. They are always parched and always bitter. They are everyone's concern, and like vampires they suck our life's blood. (Bette Davis) | ||
| 10 Oct 11, 6:34 AM EnergiserJ 6 yrs |
Wouldn't that then be"sub-standard"? Hmmm..... |
