go watch this and discuss (15)

All I can say is that I suspect a lot of pro dommes are going to be less than happy about the fact the guy referred to them as hookers.

YOU discuss it - you brought the fucking subject up!

Be the change you want to see in the world. - Gandhi.

LOL FOR REAL your to much thanks you really did make me laugh there fair play buddy as just checked your profile and it says and I quote (Manners and politeness are important to me)LOL but if that was not enough right under where you said

YOU discuss it - you brought the fucking subject up!

you had the quote from Gandhi Be the change you want to see in the world. - Gandhi so from that I take it every one who ever brings anything up has to discuss it maybe Gandhi should of said that to the British empire

I'll just put it down to you having a bad day shell we Gandhi was the same used to bully his family terribly

and another thing I never said any of what was said was my opinion just said discuss if you don't want to that's fine but please respect my right to free speech and my right to post as long as I don't break of the guidelines

and sorry if it upset anyone but it was from a podcast that I like watching anyway( what found interesting was how the press reports some issues ) and if I upset any one with my very vanilla podcast post I apologize

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePyRrb2-fzs LOL

*UPDATE* Model(s) for "how to" bondage photographs (and other bondage photographs) have now been found. Thank you to all who showed interest.

He didn't though. He just said hookers. He wasn't referring to pro dommes at all. Some prostitutes will do domination as well as the usual sex stuff.

In the US there is a legal distinction between domination (legal) and prostitution (illegal). This means that in the US you shouldn't ever refer to pro dommes as hookers. Refer to an individual and you'd be sued.

But yeah, nothing enlightening at all. Have to say though: the assumption that women are hard wired to prefer dominant men in bed is over generalising nonsense that is ignoring lots of other empirical evidence in the field of psychology that suggests otherwise.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
The Anna List Clinic: The Patient Files - restricted access

It may well be that the reasearch itself was more interesting, but this discussion of it is very shallow. Anyone who's seen other stuff from The Young Turks won't be at all surprised at that.

Actually Nightsky, after readin that post. Please don't discuss it, no really don't, thats ok. Don't worry, it's ok.

I hope that's polite enough an not infringin on Your right of free speech. I really don't mean to Because after all, as you said,

" a bad day shell we Ghandi was the same used"

an what more could you want ?

"Yeah I like Kinky stuff,dirty dark pervy stuff,weird sex.... An' Yerself ?"
Award Winning Switch.

If something was actually interesting and not a total waste of time then people will discuss it without the need to be told - sometimes at great length.

Be the change you want to see in the world. - Gandhi.

Google is your friend.

Or alternatively, do a psychology degree.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
The Anna List Clinic: The Patient Files - restricted access