18 Sep 11, 11:14 PM
Dorian8
UK(LE), 5 yrs
 |
Empress_Martine wrote:
Okay but he is open minded enough to try anything bdsm.
|
The only thing that spoils the whole thing, and entire TV series, for me is that tw*t Ashley makes such a P**s taking joke of each and every subject.
I think it makes Eurotrash look like it took a more serious approach to BDSM. |
18 Sep 11, 11:17 PM
pleasureswitch
UK(E), 6 yrs
|
Empress_Martine wrote:
pleasureswitch wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
It applies to any gender. Hames did this act in france for the tv show,where its legal but if had done it in the UK,he would have been arrested. What he would be charged with is a matter for a solicitor.
|
Police Charge people not Solicitors.
As Per Usual
|
You caught me in mid edit! Do not jump the gun and read again!
|
Changin your post AFTER you've been proved to be incorrect is, dishonest and
As Per Ususal
"Yeah I like Kinky stuff,dirty dark pervy stuff,weird sex....
An' Yerself ?"
Award Winning Switch.
|
18 Sep 11, 11:26 PM
Empress_Martine
UK(HA), 2 yrs
£
  
  |
pleasureswitch wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
pleasureswitch wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
It applies to any gender. Hames did this act in france for the tv show,where its legal but if had done it in the UK,he would have been arrested. What he would be charged with is a matter for a solicitor.
|
Police Charge people not Solicitors.
As Per Usual
|
You caught me in mid edit! Do not jump the gun and read again!
|
Changin your post AFTER you've been proved to be incorrect is, dishonest and
As Per Ususal
|
No I was editing it because I had made some grammar errors and as I am typing from a 3g phone,it does not always come out right. Now stop nit picking. As a said its down to the police to charge him and a solicitor to come up with a good defence,if the act had happen in the UK.It happened outside the UK,the act of Hames nail his scrottum. http://empressm7.uboot.com/ http://www.socialkink.com/empressmartine Vampire, pro/lifestyle ts dom/switch.Ageplay mummy/aunty/AB,medical play,domestic,energy, outdoor specialist."Awsome! But whose's look after the country's security? The FBI pull double shifts!"
|
18 Sep 11, 11:32 PM
Lady_Anna_Bradford
UK(BD), 5 yrs
  |
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
silentSmooth wrote:
This might be off topic, but nailing someone's scrotum
to some wood, could be described as an act which results in or is likely to result in serious injury to a person's genitals.
So... Would this clip be classed as extreme pornography?
|
But, if Hames were gay and the Mistress was a man then yeah, they would have been jailed for that.
|
Why?
|
Spanner.
|
Yes but I didn't see what difference the gender makes.... You were being facetious? Don't trick us like that!  
|
She said IF! He is straight.And she is not being facetious and neither am I. I say the same thing:IF!
|
My question was....why would he be jailed if they were two homosexual men but not if it were a man and woman? I know the Spanner case, but I don't see anything there that says it only applies to gay men... So..have I missed something important? (and why I think LAB was being facetious)
|
The Spanner case was obviously biased against the men because they were gay. This was further confirmed by the case just a few years later about the married couple, where the man was let off after branding his wife's buttocks. BDSM between gay men was torture and the public needed to have their morals protected but BDSM between a married couple was their own business and nothing to do with the court. These cases seem to show that hetero BDSM is okay but gay BDSM is illegal.
"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
The Anna List Clinic: The Patient Files - restricted access
|
18 Sep 11, 11:37 PM
Empress_Martine
UK(HA), 2 yrs
£
|
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
silentSmooth wrote:
This might be off topic, but nailing someone's scrotum
to some wood, could be described as an act which results in or is likely to result in serious injury to a person's genitals.
So... Would this clip be classed as extreme pornography?
|
But, if Hames were gay and the Mistress was a man then yeah, they would have been jailed for that.
|
Why?
|
Spanner.
|
Yes but I didn't see what difference the gender makes.... You were being facetious? Don't trick us like that!
|
She said IF! He is straight.And she is not being facetious and neither am I. I say the same thing:IF!
|
My question was....why would he be jailed if they were two homosexual men but not if it were a man and woman? I know the Spanner case, but I don't see anything there that says it only applies to gay men... So..have I missed something important? (and why I think LAB was being facetious)
|
The Spanner case was obviously biased against the men because they were gay. This was further confirmed by the case just a few years later about the married couple, where the man was let off after branding his wife's buttocks. BDSM between gay men was torture and the public needed to have their morals protected but BDSM between a married couple was their own business and nothing to do with the court. These cases seem to show that hetero BDSM is okay but gay BDSM is illegal.
|
Yes that is true and status que has not changed since then but I never heard of a transgender BDSM case involving such acts,unless has been one and it has been covered up? http://empressm7.uboot.com/ http://www.socialkink.com/empressmartine Vampire, pro/lifestyle ts dom/switch.Ageplay mummy/aunty/AB,medical play,domestic,energy, outdoor specialist."Awsome! But whose's look after the country's security? The FBI pull double shifts!"
|
19 Sep 11, 9:28 AM
Lady_Anna_Bradford
UK(BD), 5 yrs
|
Empress_Martine wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Empress_Martine wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Amazonia_Sidero wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
silentSmooth wrote:
This might be off topic, but nailing someone's scrotum
to some wood, could be described as an act which results in or is likely to result in serious injury to a person's genitals.
So... Would this clip be classed as extreme pornography?
|
But, if Hames were gay and the Mistress was a man then yeah, they would have been jailed for that.
|
Why?
|
Spanner.
|
Yes but I didn't see what difference the gender makes.... You were being facetious? Don't trick us like that!
|
She said IF! He is straight.And she is not being facetious and neither am I. I say the same thing:IF!
|
My question was....why would he be jailed if they were two homosexual men but not if it were a man and woman? I know the Spanner case, but I don't see anything there that says it only applies to gay men... So..have I missed something important? (and why I think LAB was being facetious)
|
The Spanner case was obviously biased against the men because they were gay. This was further confirmed by the case just a few years later about the married couple, where the man was let off after branding his wife's buttocks. BDSM between gay men was torture and the public needed to have their morals protected but BDSM between a married couple was their own business and nothing to do with the court. These cases seem to show that hetero BDSM is okay but gay BDSM is illegal.
|
Yes that is true and status que has not changed since then but I never heard of a transgender BDSM case involving such acts,unless has been one and it has been covered up?
|
Why would it be covered up? "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
The Anna List Clinic: The Patient Files - restricted access
|
19 Sep 11, 10:33 AM
Ama_Sidero
UK(GU), 7 yrs
 
   |
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
The Spanner case was obviously biased against the men because they were gay. This was further confirmed by the case just a few years later about the married couple, where the man was let off after branding his wife's buttocks. BDSM between gay men was torture and the public needed to have their morals protected but BDSM between a married couple was their own business and nothing to do with the court. These cases seem to show that hetero BDSM is okay but gay BDSM is illegal.
|
hmmm...or the "partner" scenario. I wonder if it would have still turned out the same if the participants in the branding case had been gay civil partners...
@Play_Space - First Birthday Bash THIS FRIDAY -http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/306786/4/...
Road Trip to the Sea!!! Next tentatively planned in October.....Just elapsed...More info here:http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/305429/0/...
|
