MissP wrote:
faeryboi wrote:
MissP wrote:
faeryboi wrote:
MissP wrote:
faeryboi wrote:
Fraid not, well not unless a certain other person of unhinged temper is not going.
|
As said person hasn't got a profile here, and the incident wasn't at a LLM, I'm not really seeing the point of the post?
|
The said person lurks as a guest here, although the incident was not at the LLM she has now attacked 2 members of the LLM, the point of the post is you sent me a link to the thread and i am explaining why i wont be there, furthermore i refuse to hide this incident away as that gives her the impression its ok to assault people. There is perhaps some point in that the LLM whilst being your munch is founded on the fundamental principle of us kinky folk having some regard for consent. Yet a member of this munch has now a history on non consensual violence. Perhaps before others are attacked it may be prudent to be open about it.
|
If you'd taken the very simple step of asking me, I would happily have told you that said person won't be present. However, you have instead taken the rather bizarre step of seeking attention via something that you're not planning to be at!
As I know others have advised you, if you wish to continue making allegations about said person, then the Police are the correct way to proceed, not making vague posts on here. If not, then the allegations remain allegations and said person's history remains unblemished, as the LLM, as well as not condoning non consensual violence, should also uphold innocent until proven guilty, as I'm sure you would agree. However, we aren't a kangaroo court, we're a social event!
If you do not wish to hide this incident away, which I fully understand, then please take it to the appropriate place, that not being IC or the LLM. Perhaps it would be prudent to be open about it, but the only person who can do that is you.
If I can help, you know how to get a hold of me 
|
I am truly speechless at this ridiculous reply.
|
You mean you have nothing to contribute to the logic I assume?
If you, who does not wish to attend the LLM, based on the fact that another person, also who is not attennding the LLM, has a problem with said person, at a KK event, not an LLM event, then take said problem either to the Police, or to a mutually convient non-LLM place. Here is not the place. I hope I'm making myself abundantly clear.
If you do not wish to help yourself - and that is your choice entirely, then dont expect others to help you, because we can't under those circumstances, nobody could. The only person who is "lettng her get away with it" is you. Of the people that attend the LLM. nobody saw what you claimed to have happened. That doesn't mean it didn't, it just means that we can't progress, based on what people we both know have said. I can't ban somebody based on something that nobody saw, I was several counties away at the time, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the LLM anyway. Find another vehicle for your issue, as I said before, the Police being the correct one.
I personally feel very disappointed that you've waited 3 weeks to not contact them and use the LLM as a conduit for your ire. I thought better of you as a personal friend. This is not an LLM issue, and I'd be very grateful if you'd stop posting as if it were. As I said before, if you'd taken the very simple step of contacting me first, this could very easily have been avoided, and I, and others, are now questioning your motives.
As I'm given to understand from yourself and others, said person offered an apology for anger, which you declined to accept. If that is your decision, then that's fine, but don't make a song and dance about it weeks later. If you wish to seek attention, or be a victim, that's ace too, but please post on your own thread, not on something neither of you are attending, and isn't relevant to the incident anyway.
As for ridiculous, I'll wager you'll find I only ever do spot-on accurate, but you're welcome to prove otherwise 
|
