This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
| Mon 15 Aug 11, 10:39 PM Jane_Fae UK(W), 3 yrs |
hopefully up tomorrow... a piece on one of the most significant legal cases for bdsm in some while... feedback from here will be very appreciated. jane xx Personal: http://janefae.wordpress.com | |
| 15 Aug 11, 11:13 PM bohnanza UK(FK), 12 yrs   |
I don't suppose an explanation of what it is about is too much to ask for? Rohypnol means never having to say "Would you like another coffee?". | |
| 15 Aug 11, 11:18 PM scotchmystery 15 mths |
I wouldn't get too excited Self-expression is the dominant necessity of human nature | |
| 15 Aug 11, 11:19 PM chrismanch  UK(M), 11 yrs |
Guardian CIF is a section of the Guardian Newspaper called "Comment is Free" where contributors put their personal views. I expect the OP is asking for comments on their article that is being published tomorrow. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree Chris | |
| 15 Aug 11, 11:40 PM Jane_Fae UK(W), 3 yrs |
indeed...
and preparing for the the reactionary reaction. jane xx Personal: http://janefae.wordpress.com | |
| 16 Aug 11, 7:44 AM Belasarius UK(M), 8 yrs      |
Can't see anything relevant, yet. Have I missed it? My goal - to save women from nature (Dior) | |
| 16 Aug 11, 10:09 AM Jane_Fae UK(W), 3 yrs |
no...it was due up yesterday...and they reckon today... jane xx Personal: http://janefae.wordpress.com | |
| 16 Aug 11, 10:19 AM redcat 9 yrs |
s'up http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug...
Buy a copy of Beyond the Circle CAAN statement of principle. | |
| 16 Aug 11, 10:32 AM Bubbles_2 UK(E), 6 yrs |
Seems to be one unjustifiable premise ('elf an' safety) versus another (BDSM as a philosophical belief system)clooging up the tribunals. We (the taxpayer) paid for the barrister, and everyone else, i presume. Club Subversion Crossing the Rubicon FleursduMal bobette's Facebook Beginners Guide to BDSM | |
| 16 Aug 11, 10:38 AM belle_lettriste UK(N), 18 mths |
Good piece. | |
| 16 Aug 11, 11:11 AM Daddy_SirHC UK(DA), 3 yrs |
Can't help feeling that the argument should have encompassed and element of the victims human rights. By denying her the right to wear a symbol of her relationship (akin to a wedding or engagement ring) her human rights have been breached??? Besides which I get a little giggle of a slave stating that their human right to elect to be a slave has been prevented Your Milage May Vary |
