This post is on the Other BDSM web board.
| 18 Jul 11, 11:27 AM morgan_stern UK, 2 yrs  |
Mine is kept on her toes by orders and daily tasks that are tailored to fit in around those things she has to do in order to continue to function in the 'real' world. I have absolutely no doubt that she carries out what is required of her. She sends me photos and texts of course, but it is the mindset that really controls her. She WANTS to be obedient and to please me by her obedience. Therefore she will always admit to failing - if she does - because she wants to be corrected and to learn to 'do it right' for me.
The brain is not only an under-rated erogenous zone - it's also a bloody good leash and collar! |
| 18 Jul 11, 11:28 AM IndelibleMarker UK(E), 6 yrs    |
You're seeking males, so there's no doubt about it - If you can afford it that is! Patrick |
| 18 Jul 11, 11:48 AM TheProf UK(BL), 12 yrs |
Don't be taken in by any of the lame brained 'long range remote' type devices. If you aren't in the immediate vicinity, (like the same building'), or in direct communication, (like on-line or phone), then the idea is stupidly unsafe. Back in the age of pagers, there were a few designs around for pager driver electro zapper/vibrator type devices. The problem is, that you have no real control over the final arrival time. A great idea in theory, until you start to think that they might be driving their car, or taking something out of the oven, or up a ladder, (the list is endless), when the 'message' arrived. The dreamlover 2000, is short range radio - so will work well and be safe. There are a variety of of other devices that are similarly safe - the text/bluetooth controlled vibrator, I think, will only work once the text is opened, so again safe. Controlling things within an on-line chat session is possible too. Si's new Estim has a PC based remote, which is only a programming step away from chat client control, so there may be possibilities with that too. Years ago I experimented with a DCC/chat controller, though the code is now way obsolete, and I was having problems with the part that shut the unit down if the connection was lost, or ping response went too high, (though that is down to my lack of competence as a Windows programmer, I think, rather than an inherent flaw in the concept). When it worked, it was fun. When we had connection problems is was very frustrating for all concerned. My take on the idea is that it is fine, as long as the controller has some direct form of feedback/communication, otherwise they're simply firing blind.
Mike ('The Prof') |
