This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
| Thu 12 May 11, 1:53 PM verte UK(E), 8 yrs  |
The American Psychiatric Association DSM-5 is due to be published in May 2013. There are revisions being made to various sections that may be of interest, but relevant to IC the 'Paraphilias' section is undergoing some updates and changes. http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/Parap...
Railing against the tyranny of 'common sense'. | ||
| 12 May 11, 2:35 PM Bubbles_2 UK(E), 6 yrs |
I tried reading it and my brain went fuzzy. Are they saying they are now going to distinguish between paraphilias and paraphilia disorders? i.e. i dress up in women's clothes and am quite happy and well adjusted versus i dress up in women's clothes and rush around killing babies? Club Subversion Crossing the Rubicon FleursduMal bobette's Facebook Beginners Guide to BDSM | ||
| 12 May 11, 3:02 PM SubWhisperer UK, 5 yrs  |
It's fairly straightforward – it makes it quite clear that if you are a transvestite (for instance), you are clearly suffering from (to quote the APA) “The person has clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning They make no distinction for consensual sadism, simply parroting the same phrase over and over for every classification of kink “The person has clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning “ “The person has clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning “ “The person has clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning “ A bit like a stuck Dalek really. I think they ought to be analysing themselves first, before they are let near anyone else. Whoever set that linked page up is clearly suffering from clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning EXTERMINATE – EXTERMINATE - EXTERMINATE Ever wondered who the devil comes to for ideas ? | ||
| 12 May 11, 3:09 PM Bubbles_2 UK(E), 6 yrs |
If you go into the specific 'Disorder' and click on the 'Rationale' tab, it explains that it's only a 'disorder' if it has an adverse effect on you.. "The first broad change follows from our consensus that paraphilias are not ipso facto psychiatric disorders. We are proposing that the DSM-V make a distinction between paraphilias and paraphilic disorders. A paraphilia by itself would not automatically justify or require psychiatric intervention. A paraphilic disorder is a paraphilia that causes distress or impairment to the individual or harm to others. One would ascertain a paraphilia (according to the nature of the urges, fantasies, or behaviors) but diagnose a paraphilic disorder (on the basis of distress and impairment). In this conception, having a paraphilia would be a necessary but not a sufficient condition for having a paraphilic disorder. This approach leaves intact the distinction between normative and non-normative sexual behavior, which could be important to researchers, but without automatically labeling non-normative sexual behavior as psychopathological" Club Subversion Crossing the Rubicon FleursduMal bobette's Facebook Beginners Guide to BDSM | ||
| 12 May 11, 3:23 PM Degenerate  UK(M), 5 yrs   |
Hi there thanks for this. Is anyone releasing any guidance on the sort of comments which would be good? De Vote to repeal the kinky porn ban! http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/282427/ | ||
| 12 May 11, 3:25 PM Beau_Tox UK(CB), 7 yrs  |
So, are you saying that 50% of trasvestites kill babies? I'm really not sure that you've thought these claims through Bubbles. Perhaps you have clinically significant distress or impairment in important areas of functioning... | ||
| 12 May 11, 3:33 PM verte UK(E), 8 yrs |
The problem is, if you suffer from clinical depression, anxiety, etc, psychiatrists informed by the DSM-5 make the assumption that any non-normative sexual behaviour in these categories causes this 'impairment'. Railing against the tyranny of 'common sense'. | ||
| 12 May 11, 4:33 PM Bubbles_2 UK(E), 6 yrs |
It's also this need to put things into convenient boxes, when as we all know it doesn't work like that! Club Subversion Crossing the Rubicon FleursduMal bobette's Facebook Beginners Guide to BDSM | ||
| 13 May 11, 3:07 PM skyfox UK(EH), 5 yrs |
I do believe (though I have no references handy) that it has happened that homosexual people sometimes saw their homosexuality as a disorder/defect because either they themselves had not come to terms with it or the their homosexuality caused them distress because of how others treated them (or how they perceived others treating them). In those cases, a more conservative person would say that the homosexuality was the problem, when actually it was the people around the homosexual that was bothering them. A person with mild sexual sadist tendencies may be racked with guilt over their feelings, causing "distress and impairment". But that doesn't mean the sexual sadism to blame. I do not see how the guidance presented on the website prevents this.
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. | ||
| 13 May 11, 8:38 PM Jane_Fae UK(W), 3 yrs |
how about: "fuck off, Mr psychiatrist: you AND the horse you rode into town on"? jane xx Personal: http://janefae.wordpress.com | ||
| 13 May 11, 8:48 PM Ianneil UK(N), 5 yrs |
....large academic-medical field trial settings,...... They have to be paid for and in the US that is not the government......as we all know those who pay the piper etc. On the APA web site the biggest banner is for Malpractice Insurance.....significant?
|
