23 Apr 11, 8:04 AM
Dark_Cherry
UK(B), 2 yrs
  
 |
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me 
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common? Fuck labels. Labels suck. I am a filthy, slutty, sadistic princess 
|
23 Apr 11, 8:11 AM
pilsburyDB
19 mths |
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
Sorry but its string for the win  Don't piss me off or I'm going dogging!
|
23 Apr 11, 8:18 AM
ClassAct2005
UK(N), 7 yrs
 |
Slight social change for small ones I think one might have noticed, but still better to have none and ideally no piercings either even ears.
However everyone can pick the class and characteristics they want. It's just a game. Pick the image you want to project and which makes you feel right. Simply be aware that some things will put off some people. Now that might be that some men might not want me because I don't say haitch and you was and have no tattoos just as I tend not to want men wearing gold chains round their neck but that does't mean any group is right or wrong. Just be aware of what might be the view of some others.
The other issue of tattoos other than class is simply that they are very very hard to change nf if you end up marrying a nice dominant man later who hates then you can't please him by not having them. We will all have heard of people with an ex lover's name all over them which they can't now remove. Or you might choose to change class later but you're saddled with your awful common tattoos.
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
|
23 Apr 11, 10:18 AM
Muzzlehatch
UK(TN), 7 yrs
|
ClassAct2005 wrote:
Slight social change for small ones I think one might have noticed, but still better to have none and ideally no piercings either even ears.
|
Only your opinion!
To the OP, personally... Yum!
S_C (Off to get some more 'normal' and UV tattoos done today.)
Owner of The Croppery Dungeon and Breakfast. Organises The St Leonards munch.
|
23 Apr 11, 11:05 AM
DominaFire
UK(RG), 3 yrs
|
ClassAct2005 wrote:
Slight social change for small ones I think one might have noticed, but still better to have none and ideally no piercings either even ears.
However everyone can pick the class and characteristics they want. It's just a game. Pick the image you want to project and which makes you feel right. Simply be aware that some things will put off some people. Now that might be that some men might not want me because I don't say haitch and you was and have no tattoos just as I tend not to want men wearing gold chains round their neck but that does't mean any group is right or wrong. Just be aware of what might be the view of some others.
The other issue of tattoos other than class is simply that they are very very hard to change nf if you end up marrying a nice dominant man later who hates then you can't please him by not having them. We will all have heard of people with an ex lover's name all over them which they can't now remove. Or you might choose to change class later but you're saddled with your awful common tattoos.
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
|
Personally I don't care what people think and I am sure I am not alone in not wanting to change class, I am what I am and who I am.
My son was educated privately and it wasn't easy to pay for but we did it as it was what we wanted, however, there were an awful lot of kids there with parents with pots of money and helicopters etc, did it make me feel inferior no it bloody didn't. I didn't have my tats then but if I did I would have still shown them off if it suited. Your pain is my leisure!
"Eats shoots and leaves" or maybe "Eats, shoots and leaves"
"When the glitter smears and the wires appear"
"Grains of sand is all we are, crawling on our manic star"
|
23 Apr 11, 12:30 PM
willcleanforyou
UK(CM), 3 yrs |
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
The only difference between a common tattoo and a classy one, is if it's spelt correctly.
|
23 Apr 11, 12:46 PM
Content74
UK(E), 20 mths
|
I've noticed a lot more around in these last couple of years and yes they can be incredibly sexy. They seem to be getting bigger with bolder designs and covering upper arms, top of back, up the legs, rather than just the discreet ones on ankles or the small of the back. Too many though and it can be a turn off. |
23 Apr 11, 12:53 PM
Monkey_Wench
UK(B), 20 mths
   |
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
Sorry but its string for the win
|
The dog should look sad, and have a limp as well.
|
23 Apr 11, 1:13 PM
gentlemusings
UK(M), 19 mths
 |
All_of_Me wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
Bigbob33 wrote:
Dark_Cherry wrote:
ClassAct2005 wrote:
They are as common as muck as my mother would say (on men or women).
|
Woo hoo, that's me
|
I'm with classact on this one! Bloody common and you may as well have a dog on a bit of string tied to your caravan.....
|
Mine's on a chain, does that make me less common?
|
Sorry but its string for the win
|
The dog should look sad, and have a limp as well.
|
and be scabby and bark a lot, and washing should be hung out on string tied between trees, big knickers on view for everyone! ohh and a bomfire... i love bonfires!! I am not perfect, i'm not looking for the perfect man, I just want the 'one' for whom i am perfect for....
|
23 Apr 11, 1:40 PM
The_Perfect_Sadist
UK(PO), 4 yrs
|
Ouroboros wrote:
Tattoos on women.
Not really sure if this is a kink or a fetish, but am I the only guy who thinks tattoos on women are incredible sexy?
|
Tattoos on a woman are a statement. To me they say, "I am not an ordinary woman. I am dangerous. I know what I want."
There is more than one way to skin a cat but there is only one try per cat
|
