3 Feb 11, 6:44 PM
Mistress_Rosanna
PH, 6 yrs
 |
ToakReon wrote:
<- This magnificent example.
|
Ah I wanted to say that.................... |
3 Feb 11, 7:41 PM
clare
11 yrs |
bohnanza wrote:
clare wrote:
bohnanza wrote:
1) Take the photo with a Panasonic Micro 4/3s. Failing that use a camera with interchangeable lenses. If you must use a camera phone only the iPhone will increase you attractiveness, the others will reduce it.
|
According to that research it doesn't matter whether you take pictures with an iphone or not.
|
You are wrong, if you look at the graph of attractiveness you will see iPhone photos are more attractive than average. The other phones all detract from your attractiveness, Motorola phones especially so.
|
I wasn't referring to the graph about photos. There is also a graph of sexual activity according to ownership of smart phone by brand. Just below the pic of the girl in the purple top holding a blue tumbler.
All of my landscape pictures were taken with an iphone. They don't look too bad. Would you pick up that rock? mmmmm Edited 3 Feb 11, 7:45 PM by clare
|
3 Feb 11, 9:14 PM
tanken
UK(NR), 2 yrs
|
bohnanza wrote:
clare wrote:
bohnanza wrote:
1) Take the photo with a Panasonic Micro 4/3s. Failing that use a camera with interchangeable lenses. If you must use a camera phone only the iPhone will increase you attractiveness, the others will reduce it.
|
According to that research it doesn't matter whether you take pictures with an iphone or not.
|
You are wrong, if you look at the graph of attractiveness you will see iPhone photos are more attractive than average. The other phones all detract from your attractiveness, Motorola phones especially so.
|
Or you can have some 'expert' retouching done that will take at least 20 years off you  'Kiss the boot of shiny, shiny leather' - Velvet Underground
|
3 Feb 11, 11:22 PM
Subbenn
UK(SW), 3 yrs
|
Rhoobarb wrote:
Subbenn wrote:
And if anyone needs to be made more attractive, I have an iPhone I'm willing to take photos on 
|
If you take my picture with an iPhone, can you then photograph the photograph to make me even MORE attractive?
|
I'm afraid you're already too attractive. Taking a photo of the photo may just end the universe as we know it. Worth a try though |
4 Feb 11, 8:13 AM
wonderer
UK, 5 yrs
|
bohnanza wrote:
Assuming this is for photo intended to make people either contact you or reply to you then there are a few things you can do to up the chances.
1) Take the photo with a Panasonic Micro 4/3s. Failing that use a camera with interchangeable lenses. If you must use a camera phone only the iPhone will increase you attractiveness, the others will reduce it.
2) Don't use a flash. A flash will put years on you, seven years to be precise.
3) make the photo have a shallow depth of field, ie you are in focus everything else is blurred. Do not put anything distracting in the background.
4) Take the photo round about 2am or 4pm.
All is explained in more detail at http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/dont-be-ugly-b...
|
Are you inferring causation from correlation here?
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" (Albert Einstein)
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/
|
4 Feb 11, 8:33 AM
Kitty_Fantastico
UK(OX), 2 yrs
|
Well if its a profile I'm looking at to decide if I'm interested in starting to chat with someone with the intention of future play / meet...then I want to see a face.
Yes there are some nice bottom, back or bondage shots about...but I don't want to see breasts or cocks. If they're nice ones then great..but is has zero baring on whether or not I'm going to find them attractive or want to play with them.
A lot of male subs seem to think us women must be as obsessed with their cocks as they are.
Strangely the best male pics I see all belong to Doms..and yet when I ask for and receive pics from many male subs they're equally hot by any standard. Are male subs just more cautious about showing their face than Doms incase they get seen? |
4 Feb 11, 8:42 AM
Subbenn
UK(SW), 3 yrs
|
Kitty_Fantastico wrote:
Are male subs just more cautious about showing their face than Doms incase they get seen?
|
I think that could be true - I mean, a Male Dom won't find themselves in a humiliating situation quite as often as a sub. Even if it's something as simple as crawling at someone's feet, that can damage the working-reputation of the sub far more than it will the Dom (stood up next to the crawling sub). A face-pic for a sub *could* be a lot more damaging thing than a face-pic for a Dom. |
4 Feb 11, 8:53 AM
pilsburyDB
19 mths |
I own an iPhone, but deleted my okcupid profile! Where do I stand now? I'm confused..... Do I care? Do I fuck, I'm on a roll!!!
|
4 Feb 11, 8:59 AM
Master_D_Princess_G
UK(SN), 5 yrs
£
|
Subbenn wrote:
Profile Photos
Ages ago (in fact it may have been my first), I wrote a post asking what sort of photos do people like to see on other's profiles?
I'm wondering if opinions have changed over the years, so I ask again - What sort of photos do you like to see on other's profiles?
|
Real photos of the person is the only way . Not hidden or useing some one elses photo
A RED BOTTOM IS A HAPPY BOTTOM
|
