You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Can Cis gendered people really 'get it'?  (41)

Trans_Related_Group's profile

Replies

18 Jan 11, 2:49 PM
redcat
9 yrs
I got a load of posts removed for suggesting there isn't as much serious violence against trans individuals as people in this country fear (post trans memorial day debates and all that)...i think i got a warning accross my bows about negating the trans experience.

I hate the 'partners' groups.... the one i joined seemed to have the main selling point of 'if we said this any other board we'd be accused of transphobia' well...erm.... it was the most negative hate filled bigoted board i've ever joined....but i enjoyed the thought that most of the bastard husbands they were bemoaning are probably on here getting their jollies away from home.

...but being cis on a trans board is almost as bad at times here where the cis is freak :)

a x

foibey wrote:
You've been banned from here?

edited to add: I think destroying people's clothes and enforcing limits on how often a partner performs a harmless act of self-expression is more of a sign of how entitled and willing people feel to use personal differences from the norm as an excuse to manipulate and control them than it signifies a mountain of misunderstanding that needs to be overcome.

Average people feel that they've got a right to keep "freaks" down and put them in their place, and when one appears in their life they do so pretty much with impunity whilst the "freaks" in question often end up trying to go along with this in the name of supporting their partner through a difficult learning curve.

Bizarre.

Buy a copy of Beyond the Circle CAAN statement of principle.

18 Jan 11, 3:28 PM
Degenerate*
UK(M), 5 yrs

Didn't know you had been in trouble A :-(

I think it's a really valid point that trans people may not understand non trans people's position either. yep. How can we? It shouldn't be an excuse to reject people's experience when the boot's on the other foot either.

I have always been genderfucked and continue to not understand how most people do not question gender and their gender experience, except that they have this magic element to them where it all fits. My experience has been the opposite and I struggled with gender from the minute I found out I had one because I thought someone had made a mistake and it was a load of bollocks which I was having forced on me. I still don't understand why it doesn't feel this way for everyone, but I accept that it's true and feel relieved that not everyone has to go through the confusion I do.

I think it's brilliant how hard some partners of trans people work to try and understand - where so many just reject. Yes it is one of the ways people work to accept, but feels like an impossible demand to me - to understand the impossible. It doesn;t stop people accepting (as you have done) and contining to love.

Same issue faces different factions within the trans community - eg people on the gender binary and not being unable to understand each other's experience and feelings to the point that some negate them altogether.

Back to my original post in this thread, I think trying to understand how it is for someone else is an impossibility and all we can really do is try to listen, accept each other's feelings and experiences and support each other through the changes and consequences.

I guess - it's about moving from tolerance through acceptance and hoping we can arrive at a place where we can celebrate our partners for who they are. I think we do that by listening and and accepting rather than understanding what it's like. Expecting others to understand is an impossible task, I think it sets people up to fail.. and hence must be discouraging.

De

Vote to repeal the kinky porn ban! http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/282427/
Sign up to CAAN's statement www.caan.org.uk

Edited 18 Jan 11, 3:29 PM by Degenerate

18 Jan 11, 4:22 PM
maidmichellepetite
UK, 8 yrs
I think in the last few posts not only has it answered the question its turned it around and put a new perspective on it.

Am sorry to hear Flibbertygibberty about your experience. As far as having posts banned (or culled as i like to call it) you are in good company here.

What is Cis, To me its institutional of the set Culture and Rules of the time. We are born Female or Male grow up to work, settle down and produce Families (in a gender role) to do the same, with lesiure time inbetween hopefully.

When you break that mould you will come under critism more through ignorance or unacceptance than real hate.

I think Cis needs support in their own expression which could even mean does Cis exists in the first place.

Edited 18 Jan 11, 4:24 PM by maidmichellepetite

18 Jan 11, 5:09 PM
lis0rp
UK(YO), 3 yrs
relaxed1 wrote:
Part of the problem might be enshrined in the title of this thread; cis-gendered might be an appropriate antonym for trans-gendered, but perhaps not for trans-sexual

foibey wrote:
cis-sexual tends to be taken as the antonym for transsexual. Just saying.

Who is? None of us are talking for you unless you want to be part of the tg umbrella. There are many TS people who do consider themselves part of that umbrella.

If people dont understand the relation of cis-sexual and cis-sexual to each other and their antonyms, then it would suggest that they don't really understand the relationship between transsexual and transgender. If they don't understand it, then they must only accept it because the issue has been fuzzed up so much by special interest groups.

18 Jan 11, 5:15 PM
foibey
UK(M), 7 yrs
A failure to communicate something effectively doesn't imply directly the person or group doing the communicating is fuzzing up the message -- in this case the recievers (society at large) routinely fuzz up, misinterpret and reinvent the message upon reception on a regular basis with or without anyone trying to communicate with them.

People reigniting fights over whether the umbrella of transgender people covers transsexual people or not (when it has pretty widely been defined to include transsexual people without specifically describing them) definitely does drop the signal:noise ratio though.

moo

Edited 18 Jan 11, 5:17 PM by foibey

18 Jan 11, 8:09 PM
wastrel
UK(TS), 5 yrs
Sockette_Wench wrote:
Can Cis gendered people really 'get it'?

(Inspired by responses to my previous thread on other sites, cross posted here because I get a greater range of responses to think about this way.)

This is really not going to be a cut and dry simple yes/no question, in fact, the answer is probably in several shades of grey.

It comes up fairly consistently, people saying that cis gendered people just don't seem to get it.

'It' Of course, being what it is like to be a trans-person, or even what it is to fall outside the gender binary

And I rail against it, optimism mostly forces me to, but also the belief that people have this capacity for sympathy, and when people engage it, it allows them to experience second hand things that they would never have even had a chance to experience otherwise.

So really, I largely think they can. The annoyance? People mostly don't even try. (This is where it really stops being a challenge to cis people, and a challenge to people in general. Is it really too much for people to engage their sympathies?)

I don't really want to address how exactly people don't get it, if I did, I would probably go off on a 'cis gender privilege' rant, or go on about what the feelings are that are involved in the whole process (which would of course only really apply to me, because no two cases are exactly the same). Sometime though, it's really depressing how many false assumptions come up, those based on science as well as those based on 'folk-lore', and how those assumptions seem to be holed up in some untouchable bunker 50 floors below sea level... Science on the subject of trans-people is quite frankly a load of bollocks most of the time because of bias, and folk-lore, well, it's just folk-lore. When living breathing proof is sat in front of you that the 'evidence' supplied by these sources is complete utter bullshit, why do people cling to it?

So my feeling? They can, but people don't try to. This includes people who have displayed some level of intelligence and ability to think too. (Is it any wonder that there are so many disillusioned trans people out there?)

Do you feel a need to be understood? I would have thought that all that is necessary is tolerance. Acceptance would be nice but is even that necessary?

Any fetishist can tell you how difficult it is to explain a fetish to someone who doesn't share that fetish but as long as people don't react with disgust and horror it isn't really a problem.

Ok, I really don't understand your situation. I have no idea of the problems you face. But why should people even try to understand. Isn't it enough that they leave you alone to live your life as you wish?

18 Jan 11, 8:40 PM
lis0rp
UK(YO), 3 yrs
wastrel wrote:
Ok, I really don't understand your situation. I have no idea of the problems you face. But why should people even try to understand. Isn't it enough that they leave you alone to live your life as you wish?

A significant minority don't leave us alone to live our lives as we wish - they discriminate against us. If the rest ignore this fact, then there is nothing to prevent its continuance.

18 Jan 11, 9:30 PM
Degenerate*
UK(M), 5 yrs

lis0rp wrote:
wastrel wrote:
Ok, I really don't understand your situation. I have no idea of the problems you face. But why should people even try to understand. Isn't it enough that they leave you alone to live your life as you wish?

A significant minority don't leave us alone to live our lives as we wish - they discriminate against us. If the rest ignore this fact, then there is nothing to prevent its continuance.

This is true - but I think it won't be fixed by people thinking they understand when they can't.

What do you think people can and should do about it? this is the million dollar question. And are you doing it? Or just having a problem with how others try to do it or collect together for support?

I dont know the answer either btw but if someone does, lets do it!

De

Vote to repeal the kinky porn ban! http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/282427/
Sign up to CAAN's statement www.caan.org.uk

Edited 18 Jan 11, 9:48 PM by Degenerate

18 Jan 11, 9:41 PM
Degenerate*
UK(M), 5 yrs

lis0rp wrote:
relaxed1 wrote:
Part of the problem might be enshrined in the title of this thread; cis-gendered might be an appropriate antonym for trans-gendered, but perhaps not for trans-sexual

foibey wrote:
cis-sexual tends to be taken as the antonym for transsexual. Just saying.

Who is? None of us are talking for you unless you want to be part of the tg umbrella. There are many TS people who do consider themselves part of that umbrella.

If people dont understand the relation of cis-sexual and cis-sexual to each other and their antonyms, then it would suggest that they don't really understand the relationship between transsexual and transgender. If they don't understand it, then they must only accept it because the issue has been fuzzed up so much by special interest groups.

what did you mean to say here: "cis-sexual and cis-sexual "?

the issue underlying this, I think, is that people dont see the differences anyway - to them we're all pretty similar - a bunch of trannies - a bunch of people who can;t be content within sex and or gender as allocated - a bunch of people whom some will always view as freaky people of the sex we were alllocated.

I dont give a fuck about that as long as they stay out of my face, your face and the faces of other trans people. Their opinion should not control how trans people are included or not - we may never change those opinions but we do need to push for inclusion anyway. And it can be done because it is improving for other misunderstood groups - eg homosexuals.

People who hate all of us think we're all the same freaks. it's not the fault of one group amongst the wider community, that they think this, it's prejudice. and its not the fault of trans people either.

Do you think if nobody other than trans sexual people existed (or spoke - do you just want us not to speak?) everyone would understand you? seriously?

Why do you think everyone should understand you? Do you understand everyone else in the world or do you just accept them?

De

Vote to repeal the kinky porn ban! http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/282427/
Sign up to CAAN's statement www.caan.org.uk

Edited 18 Jan 11, 9:47 PM by Degenerate

18 Jan 11, 10:43 PM
wastrel
UK(TS), 5 yrs
lis0rp wrote:
wastrel wrote:
Ok, I really don't understand your situation. I have no idea of the problems you face. But why should people even try to understand. Isn't it enough that they leave you alone to live your life as you wish?

A significant minority don't leave us alone to live our lives as we wish - they discriminate against us. If the rest ignore this fact, then there is nothing to prevent its continuance.

I'm not condoning discrimination or ignoring that it happens. My point was that 'leave us the fuck alone' is a more justifiable and attainable target than 'understand us'. Let's be realistic and acknowledge that whilst people might support the fight to end discrimination most have no interest in what actually makes trans people tick nor is there any reason they should.

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC