This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.
| Mon 20 Dec 10, 9:06 AM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
Last thread.. the much reported result that women with wealther men have more orgasms... a nice twist to that so we cannot possibly stop it there or it would be very anti-climaxical, if that's a word..... | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 9:17 AM Ianneil UK(N), 5 yrs |
Who is paying for this thread? Albeit I was out earning money I did not read Who Pays 3 (This time its personal) as Bruce Willis thwarts evil British skinflint actors with his credit card and torn vest. As for orgasms if I was the poorer half of the equation and my ever submissive tributing other half got me my duelling pistols, DC3 and Bugatti 55 (see other thread about tributes to doms)I guarantee I would have a lot more orgasms!!!!!!!!! Now I'm off to earn more money. | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 9:27 AM relaxed1 UK(BR), 6 yrs |
This thread has strayed far from the original topic and I think deserves a dignified burial. If the other topic is worthy of discussion, it would be better to start a new thread, appropriately titled. And no, 'anti-climaxical' isn't a word, but anticlimactic is.
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking up at the stars." - Oscar Wilde | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 9:40 AM PricklyPear UK, 3 yrs |
This thread is like Jaws (I just hope it doesn't have as many sequels). | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 9:52 AM ThRobin UK(SE), 19 mths |
Like Ianneil I was thinking Die Hard! | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 9:54 AM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
Ah yes. Threads don't have maximums durations, though. If people want to write they can. I am surprised about the orgasms issue. Busy richer men presumably have less time in bed, although may be if you pay people do do your chores (I can hear my cleaner vaccuuming as I type) may be you have more time for sex. If the survey was Chinese, concubines are fairly common for richer Chinese so presumably they are sharing their favours amongst one or two women although may be that makes someone a better lover rather than worn out? And you might imagine if they are rich and women are ten a penny then they would bother more about their own pleasure than hers. Apparently when we had less heat and light people got much more time in bed as there was little else to do, no television and only candles at dusk so they (a) had more sleep which made them healthier and fitter and happier and (b) more sex. Therefore you'd expect the poor to get better sex. Or may be if you're too exhausted working 2 jobs a day and night shifts you aren't as up for it.
| ||
| 20 Dec 10, 10:07 AM Asshole_Magnet UK(EX), 22 mths |
I have news for you, women *are* ten a penny, if that expensive or rare... only thing I can think of less common than women is oxygen. I'm not cynical mate, just experienced. | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 10:17 AM Top_Class UK(GU), 2 yrs |
M-f and F-m financial obligations from in the restaurant, at the cinema, at the hotel to the mortgage and the supermarket via changing nappies to the divorce and subsequent access to the children, maintenance payments and treats on days out when visits are allowed. No mention at all of the financial arrangements in M-m, F-f relationships, unless the sweeping statement "the man pays" means it's a coin-toss for M-m and a quick scarper for F-f. May be there are another 4 threads to be tagged onto this first 4 covering the wider range of sexualities and their financial arrangements or may be there's more sense floating around amongst groups of people who have had to think much more about who they are and how they fit in within society? Whatever it may be, it's undoubtedly to be observed that every which way something can be paid for it will have been paid for that way by people who are kinky, including in full consciousness not paying for it all. "Fork handles?" "No, not 'fork handles' ... four candles." | ||
| 20 Dec 10, 10:26 AM Ianneil UK(N), 5 yrs |
There is a saying among older richer Chinese men that loots of sex with young women helps extend the man's life...and if it does not who cares?!
| ||
| 20 Dec 10, 10:43 AM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
Rich older people of either gender often chase youth and even if it doesn't keep you young at least you have someone to change your incontinence pads and help you up the stairs in your 80s.
| ||
| 20 Dec 10, 10:49 AM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
You still get older/younger men in Mm relationships. I know quite a few or where one is effectively a supporter of another who is wealthy whether older or otherwise or you get simple fair division. There aren't enough gay men who have used surrogates for their children for them to be capabel of study in the uK and it's babies which skew the picture and impose unfairness on Mf relationships unless the couple have sense to ensure things are fair. There are many more examples of lesbian couples with children though and when I've read what they write they don't have the same issues of sexist men assuming women give up careers, don't work and do housework and childcare 0 instead as a couple they decide it. As long as hetero women marry men who are a bit older and earn more then even if you're not sexist and you're working out "do our joint salaries cover the cost of a nanny/nursery?" and is it work A or B working then you will continue to find women suffer career sacrifice and men lose the chance to stay home if they wish. It's only in situations where women who earn more or potentialyl will earn a lot more than their man - female surgeon marries charge nurse, tesco board director female marries man on the tills in her local branch that it is then likely the man might give up work and even then they would be likely to have help with childcare despite being a househusband.
|