This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the Other BDSM web board.
| 20 Sep 10, 1:06 PM Dracoson UK(M), 4 yrs   |
Hmmm, I think you are not suited to play clubs if this is your view. Maybe you should go to munches only if the sight of an aroused man in a club offends you. D
| ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:08 PM doowhadiddy UK(M), 24 mths |
If i am not mistaken fetish means the inability to get sexually aroused unless using a traditionaly non sexual subject such as feet or rubber or humiliation or even trampeling, so I would expect to see more errections in a fetish club than on a number 22 bus. But hey ho I was crap a school so what do I know? | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:15 PM AstronautMikeDexter UK(E), 2 yrs |
And if it were really socially unacceptable to sport random erections then I'd be in a lot of trouble. Edited 20 Sep 10, 1:17 PM by AstronautMikeDexter | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:30 PM tango_grrl UK, 3 yrs |
amazing you think it would be better to have clubs and play parties full of pissed doms, rather than ones who are visibly excited about what's going on? yuk. if doms are the "top level" what does that make everyone else?
erm, what exactly are these provincial attitudes you mention? is the frankly wierd "unwritten rule" that gentlemen with erections should whip off their trousers immediately one of them?? (cos i've never heard of that one before; maybe it's cos i'm an urban grrl) why do you think anyone (whatever their sexual orientation) would be put off a club-night by the sight of a clothed erection? i suspect that the vast majority of women into bdsm (including lesbians) don't spend much time crotch-watching, and wouldn't be offended by a bulge if they noticed one. however, as the majority of responses on here suggests, they'd find an unclothed one being unconsensually waved in front of their faces much more problematic. (in fact, the only people in my life who cheerfully admit to spending time checking out other guys' boners are gay/bi men). there are plenty of other reasons why people might be put off attending clubs. if we as a "community" don't want to "carelessly exclude" people i'd rather we started by ensuring -for example- that clubs are affordable for those of us on pretty low incomes, that there is some kind of sliding scale rather than everyone paying the same price to get in. despite the equal pay act, women's earnings are still shockingly low compared to men's. some recent research estimated that this gender gap in wages will continue until at least 2067. in fact, 1 in 5 of the uk population is described as "living in poverty", (they set this figure to mean anyone with an income lower than 60% of the national median income, in case anyone's wondering). there are groups in society, eg disabled people, young unemployed people, single parents, who are disproportionately likely to be surviving on state benefits (these could be as low as £51 per week), who we exclude from each club that charges high door prices. personally, i'd rather play with all those people than with folk who are so sex-phobic that they can't handle the thought of someone getting turned on in a play party/space.
| ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:37 PM fellatrix UK, 2 yrs |
I wholeheartedly agree. There's many a time I have been aware of of a bulge in a gentleman's trousers and I have been shocked, completely shocked, that he has not considered my sensitivities and taken appropriate action. Removing his trousers and releasing his love torpedo would only take a moment or two and would save me the embarassment of having to view that filthy perverted bulge. Sometimes I am even forced to avert my eyes! I find the cricket club one of the worst places for this behaviour; it abounds with these offensive swellings and there is no attempt to disguise them in the team photos. Do these men have no shame? But it's not just in clubs. When my dom visits me here he insists I meet him outside in the carpark. I am ashamed to admit that as he steps from the car I am invariably greeted by the sight of fabric stretched tightly across his groin as his sizeable manhood strains for freedom. Of course I insist, as much as a sub can, that he removes the offending clothing then and there, but to no avail. I am at the end of my tether. He is perfect in every other way, but I fear this cloth swathed protuberance is driving us apart. "I saw that my witticism was unperceived and quietly replaced it in the treasury of my mind." — Flann O'Brien | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:47 PM boy050505 UK, 7 yrs |
My congratulations to @somepreferkettles for a perfectedly weighted stone into the pond that is IC. Life is not a munch. | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 1:58 PM Tara_Red UK(B), 5 yrs £ |
How odd! The op obviously spends far too much time looking at crotches instead of into a dom's eyes when talking, it's like male subs who stare at a domme's cleavage. I must say I've never noticed the state of arousal of doms who've approached me in clubs as I tend to talk to their face not their crotch, unless of course they've rubbed up against me or made me kneel which would not happen generally! Pro submissive & switch with great dungeon & LOTS of toys! Edited 20 Sep 10, 1:59 PM by Tara_Red | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 2:16 PM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
Worst. Thread. Ever. The OP seriously needs to find some outlet for his fascination with other men's genitals. | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 2:19 PM Liefsome UK(S), 3 yrs   |
It's not that bad, I've found some of the basic premises of the OP and some of the responses quite humorous. It has been quite a fun distraction so far. Why are you acting like a dragon? | ||
| 20 Sep 10, 2:20 PM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
True. I should really have called it the worst OP ever. |
