You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2

Jane Fae said... (13)

This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.

26 Aug 10, 12:32 PM
emark
UK, 9 yrs
Belle_Presidente wrote:
I've just looked again at some info on the law and it says it also covers staged acts? So hoax/fake videos would still count if they were considered porn?
Yes - if it portrays the act in a "realistic way", and a "reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real."

In staged cases, usually the people would obviously be real anyway, so it's just whether the act is portrayed realistically.

Note that extracts from BBFC films are _not_ exempted from the law - further suggestioning to me the idea that a "realistic" fictional image can be covered by the law, even if we could prove (using information other than what the image itself looks like) it was fake.

Just saw your edit:

So a talking tiger wouldn't count but a realistic hoax would. Hmph. Depressing.
I agree, this is my interpretation too.

Sign the Consenting Adult Action Network's statement

Edited 26 Aug 10, 12:37 PM by emark

26 Aug 10, 3:37 PM
Jane_Fae
UK(W), 3 yrs
emark wrote:
<snip>

Just look at the phenomenon of "Reaction" videos where people post themselves watching it (but not the video itself). This tells us two things - that people view these images as disgusting, but *also*, that people see nothing wrong in watching or possessing such videos. Consider, can you imagine people posting "Reaction" videos for child porn?

ETA: There are some "Reaction" videos on YouTube.

Yes...discussed this phenomenon at the recent Onscenity conference. However, there are even bods out there who regard reaction vids with suspicion - as this story demonstrates:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/25/oz_senat...

jane xx

Personal: http://janefae.wordpress.com
Political: http://sexualitymatters.wordpress.com

Edited 26 Aug 10, 3:39 PM by Jane_Fae

26 Aug 10, 8:05 PM
spirifer
UK, 6 yrs
bohnanza wrote:
If a video of a man having his genitals mutilated is OK, would a video of female circumcision be equally acceptable?

OK/acceptable to whom? You, me, il Papa?

Ah semen. What is it about that ridiculous white secretion that pulls down the corners of an Englishman's mouth?
The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation - Pierre Trudeau
A denizen of a right little, tight little island.

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC