This post is on the SM/Bondage/Fetish web board.
| Wed 30 Jun 10, 4:44 PM fundomuk UK(NW), 7 yrs |
Hopefully an electrical engineer or someone who knows a lot about electrical motors gets to see this post.
I came across some Electromechanical Linear Actuators at work the other day (I needed to look that up btw) and wondered why these are not used more often in fucking machines rather that the normal electrical rotary motor with an arm (again looked that up) For those interested in what a Linear Actuator is see the link below but in a nutshell it is an electric motor driven arm that goes in and out, in and out (getting the picture now ) but in a neat compact frame. The key features are stroke count per minute, arm extension length and force that it generates against an movable object (again google was my friend) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_actuator So the idea my deviant mind had when I saw one was what a great idea for a fucking machine if you can find a motor of this type that has a controllable/variable but high stroke count/in out count (I guess you want at least 60 per minute - girls help here) as well as a controllable extension length (lets say 1 inch to 5 inches) and then all you need is a bit of handy work to make a frame to attach the motor to and viola, you have the basics of a compact, neat, inexpensive fucking machine. So the next step was to google Linear Actuator motor and oh boy, was that a mistake. Millions of options flooded in boggling my poor brain. So here is the challenge: Anyone who has more than a passing knowledge of these things could maybe give a link for the greater perv community on what is the best motor if one exists or otherwise shoot down my idea as crap. oh alright then .. but only one more Edited Wed 30 Jun 10, 6:03 PM by fundomuk | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 4:49 PM ComfortablyNumb UK(RG), 4 yrs |
Having built a portable fucking machine at home.... Looking at the linear option was just too expensive in the end. A decent motor put the price and weight up way too high. If price/weight/size were no object then it would have worked well. I have triple axeled thing now which fits nicely into a briefcase. P.S Anyone want to buy a completely unused portable fucking machine? ___________________________________ | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 4:50 PM AstronautMikeDexter UK(E), 2 yrs |
Probably because they are way more expensive or tricky to engineer than a rotary set up. --- Autofellatio - a lot more like having a cock in your mouth than a mouth on your cock. | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 4:58 PM fundomuk UK(NW), 7 yrs |
What is expensive I suppose? And what is the comparison between the above idea and a normal rotary/arm device?
oh alright then .. but only one more | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:29 PM Socket UK(E), 3 yrs |
How much is it going for? | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:33 PM hiatt1965 UK(BS), 5 yrs |
Slow to move and limited range of movement, usually used on aircraft to trim the flying controls. | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:48 PM Super_Slut_321 UK(MK), 4 yrs |
I imagine it is because, like me, every man would rather be a fucking machine than build one. Indeed, some of us would rather like to think that we already are fucking machines. As for the ladies, I imagine that, as long as it does the job and does it well, then, human or mechanical, they don't really care how it does what it does, just so long as it goes on doing it.
I am the Super Slut, Slut of Sluts. Look on my works, ye merely "a little bit naughty" and despair! | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:55 PM go_dutch UK(AL), 4 yrs |
i echo her statement | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:58 PM Ama_Sidero UK(GU), 7 yrs |
errr...."**at least** 60 strokes a minute" seems a bit....much.... :-O thinking he *must* be meaning something else besides stroke strokes,.... Life may not be the Party we hoped for, but while we are here, we might as well Dance! - Anon | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 5:59 PM janusxuk UK(HP), 7 yrs |
But why got to all that effort when you can just strap her to the fucking machine and settle in for an undisturbed afternoon of TV sports Many days one day | ||
| 30 Jun 10, 6:01 PM fundomuk UK(NW), 7 yrs |
LOL oh alright then .. but only one more |