12 Mar 10, 1:46 PM
subray
UK(RG), 11 yrs |
I have to laugh..I am hoping you are some sort of medical expert to make these judgements or yourself are a user of such drugs to have such a knowledgeable insight.
Let me make it clear. Mistress Tammy does not use crack or heroin. She was a bit pissed but so what. It was filmed in an open air space, well a private airfield actually, on a whim on day. She suddenly said, after an afternoon relaxing in the garden, let's go and make a film!
42 days and so judgemental..
Ksoc_Tuppep wrote:
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread but I would like to support Lady Anna on this one (and no - I'm not her, one of her personal slaves, or even one of her clients).
I agreed with her about the footage of Mistress Tammy - my impression was of someone using crack or heroin and probably not in small amounts. Unsteady on her feet (making allowances for the vertiginous heels), slight slurring of speech (making allowances for accent), repetitive in speech, pupils heavily dilated, black eyes, poor skin quality. Mistress Anna's point that if she's like that on a promo what is she going to be like on a session was well made.
Bearing in mind the OP was looking for extreme play Lady Anna's warning was timely and fair. I've seen a number of Mistress Rouge's clips (the short, free ones) and she presents very favourably on screen (I did check several times to make sure) so I was slightly surprised at the support for someone who appears very unprofessional on her own promo clip. Mistress Tammy might be a wonderful person and professionally skilled but she's also potentially dangerous if she's sessioning, not to put too fine a point on it, whilst she's off her tits.
|
http://www.subray.co.uk
Edited 12 Mar 10, 1:50 PM by subray
|
13 Mar 10, 7:15 PM
Ksoc_Tuppep
UK, 2 yrs |
I have to say that you haven't convinced me subray.
About half of the You Tube responses have had a similar reacton to me.
Your list of possibilities re expertise excludes (1) Working in a profession with regular contact with drug abusers (2) Living in an area with regular contact with drug abusers (3) Having friends or family who are drug abusers.
Being pissed doesn't explain the black eyes, the poor skin quality, the rather haggard features.
I might be wrong on this - I hope I am - but I was just defending Lady Anna's right to draw prospective clients' attention to the footage. Similarly I'd expect a heads up here in relation to the Pro Domme who exposed Max Mosely if someone requested an opinion on her. Unattributed comments saying that, for example, Mistess C wasn't very good, would be another matter. Allowing them would turn IC into an uncontrolled slagfest (not that type of slag) and I think that recently it's all been rather high octane.
S.x.
subray wrote:
I have to laugh..I am hoping you are some sort of medical expert to make these judgements or yourself are a user of such drugs to have such a knowledgeable insight.
Let me make it clear. Mistress Tammy does not use crack or heroin. She was a bit pissed but so what. It was filmed in an open air space, well a private airfield actually, on a whim on day. She suddenly said, after an afternoon relaxing in the garden, let's go and make a film!
42 days and so judgemental..
Ksoc_Tuppep wrote:
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread but I would like to support Lady Anna on this one (and no - I'm not her, one of her personal slaves, or even one of her clients).
I agreed with her about the footage of Mistress Tammy - my impression was of someone using crack or heroin and probably not in small amounts. Unsteady on her feet (making allowances for the vertiginous heels), slight slurring of speech (making allowances for accent), repetitive in speech, pupils heavily dilated, black eyes, poor skin quality. Mistress Anna's point that if she's like that on a promo what is she going to be like on a session was well made.
Bearing in mind the OP was looking for extreme play Lady Anna's warning was timely and fair. I've seen a number of Mistress Rouge's clips (the short, free ones) and she presents very favourably on screen (I did check several times to make sure) so I was slightly surprised at the support for someone who appears very unprofessional on her own promo clip. Mistress Tammy might be a wonderful person and professionally skilled but she's also potentially dangerous if she's sessioning, not to put too fine a point on it, whilst she's off her tits.
|
|
|
13 Mar 10, 8:44 PM
lisal
9 yrs |
Ksoc_Tuppep wrote:
I have to say that you haven't convinced me subray.
About half of the You Tube responses have had a similar reacton to me.
Your list of possibilities re expertise excludes (1) Working in a profession with regular contact with drug abusers (2) Living in an area with regular contact with drug abusers (3) Having friends or family who are drug abusers.
Being pissed doesn't explain the black eyes, the poor skin quality, the rather haggard features.
I might be wrong on this - I hope I am - but I was just defending Lady Anna's right to draw prospective clients' attention to the footage. Similarly I'd expect a heads up here in relation to the Pro Domme who exposed Max Mosely if someone requested an opinion on her. Unattributed comments saying that, for example, Mistess C wasn't very good, would be another matter. Allowing them would turn IC into an uncontrolled slagfest (not that type of slag) and I think that recently it's all been rather high octane.
S.x.
|
On a board I post on someone has asked for comments on Mistress Tammy with a view to sessioning with her. Two people (not including subray) have seen her and both are quite clear they have had good professional sessions with no hint of any drink or drug issues. One of them I know and he is a man who is honest and straight about his sessions and dommes he sees
I don't disagree at all that the video could be offputting. But I also think it's worth taking account of other evidence before making your mind up about someone - especially, as in this case, where the only minus point is one Youtube video
Edited 13 Mar 10, 8:52 PM by lisal
|
15 Mar 10, 12:46 PM
Lady_Anna_Bradford
UK(BD), 5 yrs
  |
lisal wrote:
I don't disagree at all that the video could be offputting. But I also think it's worth taking account of other evidence before making your mind up about someone - especially, as in this case, where the only minus point is one Youtube video
|
How about some verbal abuse and a death threat? 
One telephone call, four texts and counting...
"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.clips4sale.com/studio/26308
http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/
http://www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
15 Mar 10, 12:50 PM
Mistress_Susannah
UK(SE), 7 yrs
£ 
|
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
lisal wrote:
I don't disagree at all that the video could be offputting. But I also think it's worth taking account of other evidence before making your mind up about someone - especially, as in this case, where the only minus point is one Youtube video
|
How about some verbal abuse and a death threat?
One telephone call, four texts and counting...
|
Me too.
Nice!
www.mistresssusannah.co.uk
www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
15 Mar 10, 1:07 PM
MadameCaramel
UK(E), 5 yrs
£
 |
???????? |
15 Mar 10, 1:23 PM
lisal
9 yrs |
Mistress_Susannah wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
lisal wrote:
I don't disagree at all that the video could be offputting. But I also think it's worth taking account of other evidence before making your mind up about someone - especially, as in this case, where the only minus point is one Youtube video
|
How about some verbal abuse and a death threat?
One telephone call, four texts and counting...
|
Me too.
Nice!
|
Sadly
I haven't had those so can't comment
 |
16 Mar 10, 12:34 AM
NightFox
UK(CV), 3 yrs
|
Wow, what a fantastic cat fight we have going on here !!! The claws are out and the furs flying - bring it on ! Hiss hiss, spit, hiss.... Whoooo Edited 16 Mar 10, 12:35 AM by NightFox
|
16 Mar 10, 8:13 AM
Arctic_Swallow
5 yrs |
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
Drunk? You're being charitable Mistress. She looks like a junkie to me. Not that I am an expert.
|
I am not surprised you received a response from Mistress Tammy, Lady Anna. If you had made the judgement that I was a junkie, from one video clip, I would have felt compelled to contact you. How I did it might have been different but contact there would have been.
How dare you make such an assumption, and on the internet, about someone you have never met. Shame on you.
|
16 Mar 10, 8:28 AM
MistressRouge
UK(B), 6 yrs
£
|
Well I had a lovely email from Mistress Tammy. I liked her when I met her, however brief.
In this life, you always "reap what you sow"
I respect My karma, and would never fuck it up, I steer clear of negative, people, thoughts and energy.
OOOOoommmmmmm OOOOOommmmmmmmm " The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it. Resist it
and your soul grows sick with longing, for the things it has forbidden
itself"
Oscar Wilde
My Members Site: http://mistressrougeuk.c4slive.com/
My Videos Clips: http://www.clips4sale.com/store/13392
|
