You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Under Protection (95)

This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.

This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.

Wed 10 Feb 10, 11:02 AM
Thistle
US, 4 yrs
What does it mean when a dominant claims that a submissive is under his/her protection? Protection against what?

I ask because, though I've seen it written over and again on profiles, etc., I've always thought it seemed somewhat condescending. I just wonder what I'm not "getting" and what it means to other people?

love the brave but avoid cowards, knowing the gratitude of cowards is small ~Praxilla of Sicyon

10 Feb 10, 11:46 AM
Manteau
UK(S), 2 yrs

In a day to day scenario I think it's probably symbolic. Certainly herself needs no protection from me when she's at work! She can reduce the most 'hard' man to salt with a well aimed, polite but firm put down! The usual not necessarilly D/s questions/advice things that couples engage in isn't 'protection', it's just normal communication.

I think it's possibly more to do with a scene environment where in the times of her/his most helpless, the trust of the Dom/Domme by the sub is absolute; knowing he/she will not come to harm nor allow anyone else to harm them.. Only my take on it.

Suffering becomes beautiful when anyone bears great Calamities with cheerfulness, not through insensibility but through greatness of mind. Aristotle

10 Feb 10, 11:49 AM
Barbahella
UK(W), 8 yrs

To be honest, it's a nice big slice of fet-scene pretentious clap-trap.

London Fetish Studio
Do you really think it is weakness that yields to temptation? I tell you that there are terrible temptations which it requires strength, strength and courage to yield to. -Oscar Wilde

10 Feb 10, 12:10 PM
Onememo
2 yrs
Barbahella wrote:
To be honest, it's a nice big slice of fet-scene pretentious clap-trap.

Exactly, although it's one of the worst pieces of it on moral grounds.

10 Feb 10, 12:12 PM
Thistle
US, 4 yrs
Barbahella wrote:
To be honest, it's a nice big slice of fet-scene pretentious clap-trap.

That's pretty much my impression of it too, but so many people say it, that I just wanted to try to better understand.

love the brave but avoid cowards, knowing the gratitude of cowards is small ~Praxilla of Sicyon

10 Feb 10, 12:27 PM
bohnanza
UK(FK), 12 yrs

In some cases it means: "I am insecure, so please don't make me feel any worse by contacting a woman I vaguely know, but being BDSM we have a deep and meaningful relationship which will last for ever and this collar isn't made of Velcro, it is made of a material which looks and feels like Velcro but is made by someone else."

Why don't Mecca Bingo Halls face east?
Women wanted, preferably with their own Rohypnol.

10 Feb 10, 12:47 PM
SimpleSoul
UK, 6 yrs
Ignoring the clap-trap element for a moment (let's not be so judgemental ALL the time people).

My take on the phrase in question is that it means that a D and s are involved to a certain level but are not yet in a full blown D/s relationship. To a degree it is perhaps similar to the 'under consideration' phrase.

I have also seen it used where the D acts as mentor to the s and/or stands as 'guardian' to the s. For example when the s has lost his/her own relationship with their previous D and the D (perhaps as a close friend) takes the s under his/her wing.....as I say acting in the role of guardian. This can be useful for the s in fending of unwelcome attentions as he/she can refer them to the guardian D. It can also help the s deal with their loss and to not feel totally out of control (if they are that way inclined) by having someone provide a little structure and support at a difficult time.

In any case, provided the s agrees that they are 'under the protection' of course, it implies to me that the s has someone looking out for her/him and may well not be 'available'.

That's my take on it, for what it's worth.

10 Feb 10, 12:58 PM
Onememo
2 yrs
Black0rchid wrote:
but it still turns me on, and I write it into my stories. You can't determine what turns people on, and to be fair you can't even moralise on it, for me, when I write HE protected Lily, it turns me on.

A lot of people in the scene seem to find being called a slag or a slut highly erotic, or doing the calling. It does nothing for me except perhaps make me want to reach for a bucket, wonder what issues they have with women and call a cab home.

I do accept though that our sexuality is never governed by rules of logic, and what leaves one person stone cold, turns another one.

Do whatever turns you on, write about it, whatever, but don't expect immunity from ridicule. This applies particularly to those who try to make it into a 'scene code' or similar bullshit.

10 Feb 10, 12:59 PM
Janie_0
UK(G), 8 yrs
bohnanza wrote:
In some cases it means: "I am insecure, so please don't make me feel any worse by contacting a woman I vaguely know, but being BDSM we have a deep and meaningful relationship which will last for ever and this collar isn't made of Velcro, it is made of a material which looks and feels like Velcro but is made by someone else."

I always thought it meant, " i want a shag without the commitment"

Back to BDSM School for me then.

10 Feb 10, 1:05 PM
lima_pink_tigress
3 yrs
Onememo wrote:
Black0rchid wrote:
but it still turns me on, and I write it into my stories. You can't determine what turns people on, and to be fair you can't even moralise on it, for me, when I write HE protected Lily, it turns me on.

A lot of people in the scene seem to find being called a slag or a slut highly erotic, or doing the calling. It does nothing for me except perhaps make me want to reach for a bucket, wonder what issues they have with women and call a cab home.

I do accept though that our sexuality is never governed by rules of logic, and what leaves one person stone cold, turns another one.

Do whatever turns you on, write about it, whatever, but don't expect immunity from ridicule. This applies particularly to those who try to make it into a 'scene code' or similar bullshit.

YKIOK???

In order to know virtue, we must first aquaint ourselves with vice - Marquis De Sade

10 Feb 10, 1:14 PM
MissP
UK(EN), 8 yrs
Barbahella wrote:
To be honest, it's a nice big slice of fet-scene pretentious clap-trap.

And mostly online!

Would anybody go into a pub and introduce themselves as "Sue, under the protection of Master Uberbollix"??

www.thedivinemissp.co.uk

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

UK BDSM Awards 2011

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC