8 Feb 10, 12:58 PM
Ms_Tytania_London
3 yrs |
CookieMonster wrote:
I think your losing the plot a bit here, I'm not asking you to justify anything just explain a few of the points, i did say i agreed with the others. Thats not saying right or wrong just that they didn't make much sense. I was querying a few points because I am a complete stranger who knows nothing about your business.
It didn't seem sensible, then you contradicted yourself. The change in your stance does make sense. No need to hurl your toys out of your pram.
|
You are nit picking and being a busybody.
I can say, very confidently because I do the same job as Lady Anna, that her list and pointers are a mere rough guideline to a very intuitive process. It's our intuition that tell us whether we want to see that new client or not, I mentioned "hunches" in a previous post. That's all it goes down to. So we are bound to seem inconsistent, contradicting and bizarre to outsiders. It doesn't matter: Our MO has to make senses to us, not to the likes of you, CM.
Behold my updated website , worms!
Professional Domination UK Forum
|
8 Feb 10, 1:56 PM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 6 yrs
 |
Ms_Tytania_London wrote:
CookieMonster wrote:
I think your losing the plot a bit here, I'm not asking you to justify anything just explain a few of the points, i did say i agreed with the others. Thats not saying right or wrong just that they didn't make much sense. I was querying a few points because I am a complete stranger who knows nothing about your business.
It didn't seem sensible, then you contradicted yourself. The change in your stance does make sense. No need to hurl your toys out of your pram.
|
You are nit picking and being a busybody.
I can say, very confidently because I do the same job as Lady Anna, that her list and pointers are a mere rough guideline to a very intuitive process. It's our intuition that tell us whether we want to see that new client or not, I mentioned "hunches" in a previous post. That's all it goes down to. So we are bound to seem inconsistent, contradicting and bizarre to outsiders. It doesn't matter: Our MO has to make senses to us, not to the likes of you, CM.
|
See I was going to have a pop at Cookie's almost courtroom style of interrogative antagonism but since somebody else beat me to it I won't.
Ha, as if. I'll just join in. I do so love a good lynching.
Asking repeated questions with the obvious intention of pissing people off in order to score points off them is moderately less cuntish than just chucking abuse at them like a monkey flinging poo. But only moderately. It'd be slightly less cuntish if it wasn't done in that sort of slimy passive aggressive style.
If this board is any indication of the general perv population I'm pretty surprised anybody lasts more than ten minutes as a PD without kicking off like the proverbial disgruntled postman. “Some people never go crazy, What truly horrible lives they must live”
|
8 Feb 10, 2:10 PM
Mistress_Susannah
UK(SE), 6 yrs
£
|
Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
Ms_Tytania_London wrote:
CookieMonster wrote:
I think your losing the plot a bit here, I'm not asking you to justify anything just explain a few of the points, i did say i agreed with the others. Thats not saying right or wrong just that they didn't make much sense. I was querying a few points because I am a complete stranger who knows nothing about your business.
It didn't seem sensible, then you contradicted yourself. The change in your stance does make sense. No need to hurl your toys out of your pram.
|
You are nit picking and being a busybody.
I can say, very confidently because I do the same job as Lady Anna, that her list and pointers are a mere rough guideline to a very intuitive process. It's our intuition that tell us whether we want to see that new client or not, I mentioned "hunches" in a previous post. That's all it goes down to. So we are bound to seem inconsistent, contradicting and bizarre to outsiders. It doesn't matter: Our MO has to make senses to us, not to the likes of you, CM.
|
See I was going to have a pop at Cookie's almost courtroom style of interrogative antagonism but since somebody else beat me to it I won't.
Ha, as if. I'll just join in. I do so love a good lynching.
Asking repeated questions with the obvious intention of pissing people off in order to score points off them is moderately less cuntish than just chucking abuse at them like a monkey flinging poo. But only moderately. It'd be slightly less cuntish if it wasn't done in that sort of slimy passive aggressive style.
If this board is any indication of the general perv population I'm pretty surprised anybody lasts more than ten minutes as a PD without kicking off like the proverbial disgruntled postman.
|
Loving your work Doghouse!
I can't help but agree with what LAB and Ms T have said. Trust that we know our business well enough - having done it for years - and we've developed our own system, our own intuitions etc etc... It's up to me who I see - and as Miss P has said, it's a very positive thing. We're not just taking money from anyone by pretending to offer what we're not really into or can't provide. We're being highly selective for our own needs.... and for those that come to see us.
In terms of what I say when I decide not to session with someone..... I'm usually brutally honest - in a diplomatic way, of course. If their approach is wrong, I tell them. If they're into different things, I tell them a session with me would be unfulfilling for us both and recommend someone who would be better for them.
www.mistresssusannah.co.uk
www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
8 Feb 10, 2:14 PM
the_unsub
2 yrs |
Mistress_Susannah wrote:
In terms of what I say when I decide not to session with someone..... I'm usually brutally honest - in a diplomatic way, of course. If their approach is wrong, I tell them. If they're into different things, I tell them a session with me would be unfulfilling for us both and recommend someone who would be better for them.
|
That's a very positive approach  , I'd expect that the not knowing why, wondering what's wrong with their approach, is it something they said could be difficult for someone who gets turned down. Especially if it turns in to a run of rejections (could happen).
And, of course, if you think someone is not suitable simply because of different interests then referring that person on to someone you think is better suited is a nice thing to do Try again. Fail again. Fail better. - Samuel Beckett
Edited 8 Feb 10, 2:25 PM by the_unsub
|
8 Feb 10, 2:24 PM
Lady_Anna_Bradford
UK(BD), 5 yrs
  |
the_unsub wrote:
Mistress_Susannah wrote:
In terms of what I say when I decide not to session with someone..... I'm usually brutally honest - in a diplomatic way, of course. If their approach is wrong, I tell them. If they're into different things, I tell them a session with me would be unfulfilling for us both and recommend someone who would be better for them.
|
That's a very positive approach , I'd expect that the not knowing why, wondering what's wrong with their approach, is it something they said could be difficult for someone who gets turned down. Especially if it turns in to a run of rejections (could happen).
|
If someone sends me a form (I have a very comprehensive online application form) and all they have done is tick a few boxes I don't bother replying. Life is too short to give time to people who can only tick boxes when they are bored, or can only tick boxes because they have nothing to say for themselves.
If someone has completed my form correctly and clearly spent time in doing so, but isn't suited to me, I will respect their effort and explain why I do not think we are suited. Most of the time the client gets back to me and further explains or clarifies his words and I agree to see them. Some will thank me and ask for a recommendation, which I will try to do based on my knowledge of other PDs. Some, I think, just read and delete.
If someone is turned down all the time then I have no sympathy. They are clearly doing something very very wrong. "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.clips4sale.com/studio/26308
http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/
http://www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
8 Feb 10, 2:32 PM
Lady_Anna_Bradford
UK(BD), 5 yrs
|
Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
See I was going to have a pop at Cookie's almost courtroom style of interrogative antagonism but since somebody else beat me to it I won't.
Ha, as if. I'll just join in. I do so love a good lynching.
Asking repeated questions with the obvious intention of pissing people off in order to score points off them is moderately less cuntish than just chucking abuse at them like a monkey flinging poo. But only moderately. It'd be slightly less cuntish if it wasn't done in that sort of slimy passive aggressive style.
If this board is any indication of the general perv population I'm pretty surprised anybody lasts more than ten minutes as a PD without kicking off like the proverbial disgruntled postman.
|
I'm gonna bookmark this exact post, and take credit for it, when it needs to be rolled it out to the next heckler 
"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.clips4sale.com/studio/26308
http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/
http://www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
8 Feb 10, 2:35 PM
the_unsub
2 yrs |
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
If someone is turned down all the time then I have no sympathy. They are clearly doing something very very wrong.
|
I see your point Try again. Fail again. Fail better. - Samuel Beckett
|
8 Feb 10, 4:21 PM
CookieMonster
UK, 6 yrs
|
Eh?
CookieMonster wrote:
Item 1
Who pays the piper calls the tune? If you dont like what the want surely that falls into other catergories?
Item 2
Why should they? they may just want one particular service you advertise? see my answer above.
Item 3
Depending on their life and commitments I can see locality as a valid priority. If I was hiring I'd prolly look at 6 nearest then pick one,again, depending on my scedule.
|
Do you see all those questionmarks? Thats hardly telling you what to do. Suprising as it may seem its not all about you. I did say earlier in this thread i beleive that I would prioritise on distance, so asking about your point is a valid question especially when other PD's have agreed.
at least you say how prevelant this attitude is or do you think its reasonable for a sub to research the best in the country then approach regardless of distance.
I suggest you and a few others look up Dominatix Toxemia because there really is a strong whiff of it.
|
8 Feb 10, 4:26 PM
CookieMonster
UK, 6 yrs
|
Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
See I was going to have a pop at Cookie's almost courtroom style of interrogative antagonism but since somebody else beat me to it I won't.
Ha, as if. I'll just join in. I do so love a good lynching.
Asking repeated questions with the obvious intention of pissing people off in order to score points off them is moderately less cuntish than just chucking abuse at them like a monkey flinging poo. But only moderately. It'd be slightly less cuntish if it wasn't done in that sort of slimy passive aggressive style.
If this board is any indication of the general perv population I'm pretty surprised anybody lasts more than ten minutes as a PD without kicking off like the proverbial disgruntled postman.
|
Makeing any sense of your posts is like trying to ladle treacle with an egg whisk.
Passive/Agressive? lol
Where? Courtroom style? what? You seem a bit confused but seeing the number of times ive hung you and your little red buddies out to dry intellectually you can hardly be discribed as a neutral observer.
can you come up with anything more substantial than airclaims and trolling?
|
8 Feb 10, 4:34 PM
Ms_Tytania_London
3 yrs |
CookieMonster wrote:
ou seem a bit confused but seeing the number of times ive hung you and your little red buddies out to dry intellectually you can hardly be discribed as a neutral observer.
|
That must have been on a different board, surely? Because all I've ever seen is the exact opposite happening, ie, you being put out to dry intellectually, often by Doghouse_Reilly, and too many times to mention. Behold my updated website , worms!
Professional Domination UK Forum
Edited 8 Feb 10, 4:35 PM by Ms_Tytania_London
|
