You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4

New airport screening & Chastity devices (32)

This post is on the Other BDSM web board.

5 Feb 10, 11:34 AM
Attitude_Adjuster
UK(N), 6 yrs

Ms_Valentine wrote:
Attitude_Adjuster wrote:
Ms_Valentine wrote:
I am afraid I disagree with what you have said.

I see no reason why people for whom chastity is a harmless part of their D/s lives should alter their daily habits and rituals just because they may set off a scanner.

Despite the fact that the whole airport thing is a pile of steaming cock...

You have to abide by their rules, and courtesy to other passengers and the airport staff matters. Forcing the airport staff to strip search you to find out what the fuck that vibrating bullet/remote e-stim/chastity what not actually is because you can't leave your kink at home for 10 minutes... 3rd party involvement and all that IMHO.

ETA - why can't you put it back on *after* the seat belt light goes out?

Some people are just wearing a chastity device, plastic with maybe a tiny metal hinge quite harmlessly under their clothes as part of a ritual which maybe 24/7 and as it is something private and hidden from everyday view, I really see no reason why they should not wear it and just see if it gets picked up upon. If it does and they don't like being asked questions, taken aside etc they can decide what to do in future, either don't fly anywhere or don't wear their device.

As far as I know, no rule says you mustn't wear a chastity device whilst flying so why on earth would you not do it if it were your norm.

Everyone seems to be way too prepared to give up on all our civil liberties nowadays and taking a stand to behave as you normally would and not be cowed into altering what you do, provided what you are doing is perfectly legal and innocent, seems fine to me.

Is everyone with piercings down below, some of which would be hard to get back in by themselves, going to take them all out just so the airport staff don't have to ask them about it. They are prepared to operate the scanners, they should be prepared to be adult and understand people do all kinds of uncommon but perfectly legal things with their own bodies.

I fail to see how taking near naked images of a paying customer is behaving respectfully toward us. If I thought it might even work to stop an act of terrorism, I might consider it worthwhile but I doubt it will. Human error plus innovative ways of working by terrorists will mean sometimes a bad thing will happen. Living in such fear and giving up all our rights means the terrorists have won the battle already.

I completely agree about the civil liberties issue, but the way to object to that is by writing to your MP, not by causing inconvenience to other passengers and engaging staff in your kink - that's all. If its not detected, then it doesn't matter either way.

And all men kill the thing they love, By all let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!

5 Feb 10, 11:39 AM
DaveTheJackal
UK(M), 7 yrs
Makes you wonder what they do when they have a suspected drugs mule in one of these things, it'd make a cavity search ... difficult. Do they keep bolt cutters out for just such occasions?
5 Feb 10, 12:26 PM
slave2ma
UK, 5 yrs
Having thought about security at airports and the cunning of the bombers would not the best solution be that everybody had to fly naked? But would they still allow the chastity device and would the wearer be proud to display their status

The source of all unhappiness is other people

5 Feb 10, 12:28 PM
morgan_MP
UK, 8 yrs

As our slave forgot to put the link in to the weblog he wrote on this subject, i shall do it for him to save you all having to plough through all his others

http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/48040/

it may help people to know that it really doesnt matter, they are going to see a lot more over the years.

it doesnt hold up the plane or cause delays for other passengers as everyone has to go through this process, hence, when you get the other side of the search you still have a 2 to 3 hour wait before boarding the plane, this is to allow for anomolies such as this.

Planes book a 'window' for take off, they have to take that time so anyone who causes a problem will be held back by security.

Airlines have more problems with drunks than with some person with a kink who wears a chastity device in his 24/7 NONE FANTASY real life.

I suspect that some note will have been made by the security on the day that bruce went through as to what you may find surrounding the nether regions.

please note that bruce's weblog was written back in august 2005, nearly 4 and half years ago so i should imagine that in that time they have seen more than just bruce's plastic one but the steel ones as well.

This is not a new gadget, it has been around for some time for testing.

morgan_MP

Meus dominus fidelis mancipium, semper
“Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.” Plato

5 Feb 10, 12:37 PM
Earl_of_Lynchmere
UK(GU), 5 yrs
DaveTheJackal wrote:
Makes you wonder what they do when they have a suspected drugs mule in one of these things, it'd make a cavity search ... difficult. Do they keep bolt cutters out for just such occasions?

I imagine they have tools for every eventuality, like the firemen who recently had to cut a male member out of a piece of steel pipe that had miraculously attached itself and couldn't otherwise be shifted.....

5 Feb 10, 12:43 PM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
Attitude_Adjuster wrote:
I completely agree about the civil liberties issue, but the way to object to that is by writing to your MP, not by causing inconvenience to other passengers and engaging staff in your kink - that's all. If its not detected, then it doesn't matter either way.

But where is the inconvenience to anyone? If they want to check you out and ask further questions you'll be taken to a private room and the remaining the staff will to continue to deal with the rest of the queue. They won't suspend all operations until they've finished questioning someone. And given that for long haul flights you need to check in at least 2hrs beforehand you're unlikely to be delaying take off.

--- Ha!

5 Feb 10, 12:55 PM
Attitude_Adjuster
UK(N), 6 yrs

Danbuc wrote:
Attitude_Adjuster wrote:
I completely agree about the civil liberties issue, but the way to object to that is by writing to your MP, not by causing inconvenience to other passengers and engaging staff in your kink - that's all. If its not detected, then it doesn't matter either way.

But where is the inconvenience to anyone? If they want to check you out and ask further questions you'll be taken to a private room and the remaining the staff will to continue to deal with the rest of the queue. They won't suspend all operations until they've finished questioning someone. And given that for long haul flights you need to check in at least 2hrs beforehand you're unlikely to be delaying take off.

There are never queues at security, the extra personnel, space, and equipment costs don't wind up being added to the bill, and the x-ray operators never slow down the conveyor belt when they can't immediately see what's going on....

Never had to wait for a bag search because all the bag searchers are searching bags?

And all men kill the thing they love, By all let this be heard, Some do it with a bitter look, Some with a flattering word, The coward does it with a kiss, The brave man with a sword!

5 Feb 10, 1:05 PM
Fifislut
2 yrs
The goverments are using the threat of terroists to slowly take more of our free will and right away and turn us into a nanny state... this is just another example.

"THE GOVERMENT SHOULD BE AFFRAID OF ITS POEPLE, People should not be affraid of their goverment" - V for Vendetta

5 Feb 10, 6:14 PM
slave2ma
UK, 5 yrs
Fifislut wrote:
The goverments are using the threat of terroists to slowly take more of our free will and right away and turn us into a nanny state... this is just another example.

"THE GOVERMENT SHOULD BE AFFRAID OF ITS POEPLE, People should not be affraid of their goverment" - V for Vendetta

Not that I disagree with the sentiment but can anybody explain to me why the government when it is clearly so democratic and reflective of the peolpes' wishes wants to take away the free will

The source of all unhappiness is other people

6 Feb 10, 3:25 AM
bruceMPMm
UK, 7 yrs
Many thanks, Miss! XXX

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC