The Pope (16)

Politics's profile . Politics group posts

Doghouse_Reilly
Posted by Doghouse_Reilly on Tue 2 Feb 10, 7:23 PM

Spastic or retard? Which is it?

I've got to be honest this is one tough call.

Call me old fashioned but I think we ought to burn him. That'd fix his wagon.

Replies

3 Feb 10, 7:57 PM
tom_tom
UK(SO), 5 yrs
Which side are you on - Harriet Harman's or the Pope's?
Tough call...
Da Vinci was a well known sexual deviant. You know that sketch of the naked man in the wheel? Blueprints for a rape machine.
~~~
snowboarding FTW

3 Feb 10, 8:45 PM
dave_j
UK(L), 5 yrs

tom_tom wrote:
Which side are you on - Harriet Harman's or the Pope's?
Tough call...
thats an interesting one.
theoretically at least the Pope has some sort of 'evidence' or justification for his argument. Harperson is just a complete nutjob.
of course the Pope's argument does fall apart if you could ask him to point to the part where Christ (who Christians are supposed to follow) says anything about homosexuals being wrong. rather than just spouting something from the Jewish religion. (which logically is anything before Christ came along)
they can have my FREEDOM when they pry it from my cold dead hands.

3 Feb 10, 10:51 PM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 4 yrs

I think it's odd they let a gobshite like the Pope into the country at all. I mean if a radical cleric from a certain other religion was causing a fuss the inclination would be to tell him to bollocks.
So what we've got is a former member of the Nazi party wanting to come to the UK and tell us that we ought not afford homosexuals their rights as human beings.
The man is a cock.
If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, you might want to stop waving that axe around.

4 Feb 10, 3:39 PM
princess_sPankypants
UK(FK), 5 yrs
got no time for a religious order that not only peddles filth but stupidity as well
i have no anger towards this person, just a quiet despair that he will continue to preach to his people when his house is filled with disgusting abusers that he continues to support
it's alright him taking the moral highground but to do that he must have a clean order, and his order is far far from clean
i have no reason to hate homosexuals, i do have reason to hate child abusers and those who support them
i certainly wouldnt give him the time of day and anyone who follows this teaching really needs to dig deep in their own thoughts and feelings, supporting this means you also support what it stands for, and from what i see it stands for something that is sick in this world
and whilst he continues to hide this disgusting act he certainly does not speak Gods words, in which case, what he says about homosexuals has to be suspect
show me something different xkx

4 Feb 10, 4:29 PM
Stellan_Skarskroenen
UK(M), 13 mths

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
So what we've got is a former member of the Nazi party wanting to come to the UK and tell us that we ought not afford homosexuals their rights as human beings.

You can accuse Ratzinger of many things but membership of the Nazi Party isn't one of them.
Ratzinger was compelled by law to join the Hitler Youth at 14; at 16 he was obliged to participate in the Luftwaffenhelfer program and a year later was conscripted into the Wermacht. His war experiences were typical of many young men in Germany at the time. At no time did he or any close member of his family join the Nazi Party, indeed his father's career suffered because of his antipathy to National Socialism.
What we are left with is the fact that the head of the Roman Catholic Church is anti-homosexual which is only news to those who are surprised that the head of the Roman Catholic Church is a Roman Catholic or that bears shit in the woods.
Hello. My name is Inigo Kroenen. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

5 Feb 10, 4:20 PM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 4 yrs

Cpt_Rhett_Kroenen wrote:

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
So what we've got is a former member of the Nazi party wanting to come to the UK and tell us that we ought not afford homosexuals their rights as human beings.

You can accuse Ratzinger of many things but membership of the Nazi Party isn't one of them.
Ratzinger was compelled by law to join the Hitler Youth at 14; at 16 he was obliged to participate in the Luftwaffenhelfer program and a year later was conscripted into the Wermacht. His war experiences were typical of many young men in Germany at the time. At no time did he or any close member of his family join the Nazi Party, indeed his father's career suffered because of his antipathy to National Socialism.
What we are left with is the fact that the head of the Roman Catholic Church is anti-homosexual which is only news to those who are surprised that the head of the Roman Catholic Church is a Roman Catholic or that bears shit in the woods.

Can accuse him of it, cos he was a member of it. Whether he believed in the cause or not, well we won't ever know. Nazi or not he still helped to enable priests to get away with fucking little boys and he's still done as much as anybody to promote the spread of AIDS.
He's just an evil bastard. One of the most evil bastards in the world I would say.
If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, you might want to stop waving that axe around.

5 Feb 10, 6:28 PM
Stellan_Skarskroenen
UK(M), 13 mths

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
Can accuse him of it, cos he was a member of it. Whether he believed in the cause or not, well we won't ever know. Nazi or not he still helped to enable priests to get away with fucking little boys and he's still done as much as anybody to promote the spread of AIDS.
He's just an evil bastard. One of the most evil bastards in the world I would say.
If the facts and reality don't mean anything to you then why restrain yourself to accusing him of being a member of just the Nazi Party?
Why not accuse him of being a member of the SS as well, or the staff of Auschwitz or of Hitler's inner circle of advisors?
And instead of simply accusing him of supporting policies which spread HIV how about pushing the bullshit boat out and saying that he invented HIV in a secret, underground, Vatican, laboratory staffed with robot Nazi scientists?
Frankly my dear I couldn't give an oblong flyinhg fuck. Now, get all your shit together and fiddle-de-fuck-right-off my veranda.

5 Feb 10, 7:18 PM
princess_sPankypants
UK(FK), 5 yrs
on a more practical level how can this country afford the sort of security that is going to be needed for this sort of visit, when we can barely afford the necessities for those who live in this country
surely if this man was mindful of the poor and needy he wouldn't put this amount of pressure on at this time
we truly can not afford this visit, on any level!
to my mind it's an ego trip for a failing faith that is going to cost the tax payer a lot of money that the tax payer just does not have

show me something different xkx

6 Feb 10, 8:34 AM
proccie
UK(HP), 4 yrs

In his mind he is doing good because the most important thing by far for him is the saving of souls. How those souls live their short squalid poverty stricken lives if of lesser consequence as long as their souls are saved.
Once you accept that the saving of souls is the most important thing, then everything that he has done is logical. The worst that one can say is that he is wrong in his original belief.

Zen S&M: The sound of one hand smacking.
'()_/)
(>'.'<)
(")_(") < MINE!
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings. (Dawkins)

6 Feb 10, 9:30 AM
princess_sPankypants
UK(FK), 5 yrs

proccie wrote:
In his mind he is doing good because the most important thing by far for him is the saving of souls. How those souls live their short squalid poverty stricken lives if of lesser consequence as long as their souls are saved.
Once you accept that the saving of souls is the most important thing, then everything that he has done is logical. The worst that one can say is that he is wrong in his original belief.

and i dont accept he is saving souls, he is covering up the wrongs, which is not saving anyone except his own arse and the arse of those who did such a grave wrong
i suspect there are too many of them and his fear is that should it all come out in the open the catholic faith would be filled with such shame that no one would follow it anymore
well thats just tough, they should have thought about that before they allowed these things to go on and on and on
it still does not bring down belief in God, it just means some men have got God completely wrong and use it to justify their own sick ends
God knows this and God will make this right, just as soon as men understand that it is men at fault and not God
the pope too will have a judgement day and unless he removes the sickness from that order i really don't fancy his chances, turning a blind eye will not save him or those who follow him
a true follower of God will question the wrongs of that order, anyone who follows blindly is just as guilty as those who perpetuate this crime against the innocent

show me something different xkx

Next page


	©1997-2010 Informed Consent