This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
| Thu 28 Jan 10, 10:46 PM Sirebel UK, 5 yrs |
The extreme pornography law defines extreme as: An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, any of the following—
and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real.
So does this class as extreme pornography? I mean he doesn't threaten her life, it's an accident I don't know what's right and what's real any more | ||
| 28 Jan 10, 11:06 PM Sorceror UK(HU), 8 yrs |
Probably not but if you live anywhere near North Mold I'd be careful even watching a Frosties advert.... S.x. | ||
| 28 Jan 10, 11:11 PM Esinem UK(SE), 12 yrs |
Nah! That's comedy If bondage is your thing, this is the place to be: | ||
| 28 Jan 10, 11:48 PM emark UK, 8 yrs |
Sign the Consenting Adult Action Network's statement Edited 28 Jan 10, 11:49 PM by emark | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 12:22 AM Lady_Custard UK(TW), 2 yrs |
I'm aroused by the 'knife demo' scene in Magicians | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 3:32 PM Sirebel UK, 5 yrs |
Is that why your partner was laughing on the rack on saturday night? Make it funny and it's not illegal. I like the idea I don't know what's right and what's real any more | ||
| 30 Jan 10, 4:42 PM tanken UK(NR), 2 yrs |
Well this is a very debatable point because who decides whether something is 'arousing' or not given that we all have differences in what makes us aroused. What makes me aroused would definitely be a turn off for most people. 'Kiss the boot of shiny, shiny leather' - Velvet Underground |