This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.
| 29 Jan 10, 3:03 PM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
You might not like one of the second type. It depends on your own natural instinct. To some men it must seem a boring huge task to control a woman (and no one would do it for everything anyway) but for others it's very sexy to control what she wears, may be what she eats, does etc. If I would be burden for a man then I don't want him. The last thing I want is someone who is doing what I say because I want it. If it just comes naturally to him to take charge then it's pretty easy on both sides. And of course no one really will decide everything - you live your lives but know that he could stipulate whatever he chose. There's a balance. Someone saying he is dominant but never dominating is not likely to keep most submissives in a state of submission. You need to feel the control. It needs to be there, not just said. Some things will help maintain the dynamic but they will vary from couple to couple.
| ||
| 29 Jan 10, 4:16 PM benevolentviolence UK, 6 yrs |
I don't think of myself as a particular type of submissive woman. I have no interest in conforming to type or comparing myself with other people. You can only be submissive to someone else. You can be as submissive as you like in your own head, but if you don't interract then it's just all air isn't it? I couldn't possibly analyse why I do the things H asks me to do, or demands me to do, other than we get along quite well and he doesn't ask or demand too much. Or if he does he makes sure there's an incentive. Giftage is an easy swayer for me. I have had periods where I have felt frustrated and puzzled by TPE, and periods where I've settled in. Over umpteen years of domlyness I have learnt to get along with whatever state I'm in. Most people do. So if you wanted to, you could call me a Pavlov's dog kinda sub. Truth to tell you can 'type' me any way you want to, it's all nit picking nonsense in any event as the wonderfulness of people generally is their adaptability. Edited 29 Jan 10, 4:20 PM by benevolentviolence | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 4:29 PM tony999 UK, 5 yrs |
Hardly a surprise. Your profile states you are male. Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 4:41 PM Incandescence UK, 3 yrs |
Yeh I very much agree on the sliding scale thing. And I think where a particular individual lies on the scale at any one point in time will depend greatly on the other half of the relationship.
In order to know virtue, we must first aquaint ourselves with vice - Marquis De Sade | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 5:38 PM tazallie UK, 2 yrs |
I am not interested in being a sexual submissive only, but neither do I want 24/7. I am submssive, it is part of who I am, the same as I am a mother, a friend, a lover, a career woman etc...they all make me who I am. All intermingled, all demanding a slice of my time and psyche, all at my core. I have given him my sexuality by my own choice the same way that I make the tea and coffee, make the dinner when he is with me. Because I want to, because it fulfills my needs by fulfiling his. He gets to choose some of my clothes, but only in so much as he can say 'wear a skirt today', the choice of skirt is mine, my way of expressing who I am, and if there is a reason I can't wear a skirt I will tell him and know that he will understand if I have a genuine reason. Just as if there is a reason he wants me to wear something for a specific reason then I will listen to him and conceede where possible. But having said that, if I had had a bad day at work, my daughter was ill and I was tired would I want him to make me a cup of coffee, cook dinner and help tidy up? Absolutely, as part of his commitment to me (is the same as mine is to him) is to look after me, to care for me, to protect me and he does it very well. Do I want him to juggle my finances or make my decisions or run my life? Absolutely not, I am more than capable of it and its part of who I am. Would I be lost without him? Yes I would but I would survive and continue to live my life and to find happiness and fulfilment in it. My submission is tempered by my other commitments, it cannot be my whole world as I do not live in a box. I hold a job, I am a Mum, a sister, a friend and daughter...and each one of those relationships are just as vital to me as my Masters...they make me who I am, the person my Master chose. I will not compromise them any more or any less than I will my relationship with him. And this works for me, for us, its not everyones way but its mine, ours. I am me in all my personas...submission is fundamental to who I am, it is at my core, but equally so is being independent, being a mum and a sister, etc. Tazallie | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 7:26 PM tony999 UK, 5 yrs |
I am lucky with the quality of replies I'm getting on this. Thanks. Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. | ||
| 29 Jan 10, 8:33 PM painsublime 4 yrs |
If a Dom demanded to choose for me the friends I see etc it'd be over. Even though I think that's quite unlikely to happen. But after all I hate micromanagement. | ||
| 30 Jan 10, 1:23 AM Cassius UK, 3 yrs |
Practise senseless acts of beauty. |