You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Women - The Naturally Dominant Gender? (96)

This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.

This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.

19 Jan 10, 1:59 PM
Ms_Tytania
7 yrs
IndelibleMarker wrote:
Here's another quote from this Domme's guide:

Why women are the greater sex

Because I say so.

Dominantly,

Ms Lorelei

That's it in a nutshell, ad she could have spared us from a lot of unnecessary dribble. But then you don't get a book deal a one liner :-D

"People are inherently evil, but very, very funny" - Joe Orton.

19 Jan 10, 2:07 PM
chaochou
UK(CH), 3 yrs


IndelibleMarker wrote:

Surely it's ridiculous to say that 'all women make better decisions than men' and equally silly to state 'every man has a burning desire deep down to be controlled'?...

...Or is it? Discuss!

'Better' requires a value judgement. So you could define it as true if you wanted by altering your value judgements such that it was true.

That's not to defend what's been written, just pointing out that there's no inherent 'truth' nor 'falseness' to that statement. It's truth, or lack of, is a choice.

As for a 'every man has a burning desire to be controlled by a woman' - again, that reads like an article of faith to me. Not so much a statement of fact as of belief, which you can choose to accept or reject.

Personally, I don't see the point of buying into either.

- edited for typos -

Edited 19 Jan 10, 2:09 PM by chaochou

19 Jan 10, 2:24 PM
Captain_Jack
UK(CR), 5 yrs

Women are 'born' to procreate. Procreation is difficult, risky and it's a team effort.

As the female gender is by biological necessity already saddled with certain responsibilities, it's only natural that the other gender ends up with the responsibilities which happen to lend themselves to be more useful in the acquisiton/application of power.

But just because we evolved this way biologically, doesn't mean we can't redefine the gender roles or even artificially change them now that we have the technology.

Nowadays, people can do almost whatever they like and yay for that. By all means, drivel like that should be voiced, but also not be taken seriously.

My 2p.

Your Captain Jack

19 Jan 10, 2:25 PM
Susan_Williams
UK(CH), 3 yrs

Ms_Tytania wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:

I don't believe that what she has written is true but I can understand where she (and female supremacy) is coming from when you consider that in many cultures a male is controlled by females from birth for the formative years of his life.

Mother >> female relatives >> Babysitters >> Nursery teachers >> primary school teachers >> lunchtime supervisors = all female. A huge number of boys don't have a male teacher until they are in secondary school.

Men are programmed to respond to female control ;)

The hand that rocks the cradle and all that...

Yes, in some non-Western, primitive societies, rites of passage into "manhood" are designed in a way that the boy is taken away from the female sphere where he's spent his formative years (till 10 years old more or less), often by force. This is a ritual in itself, with lots of psychodrama to convince the boy that to go back to mummmy's lap would be shameful and counterproductive to his development into adulthood. In many of these primitive societies, too, almost all contact with females is cut off till the often long initiation is accomplished succesfully, to prevent "contamination". That means, being too tempted by the comforting presence of the mothers and aunties, whose protection and nurturing is essential for a child, but an adult should move on from.

Dr Tyania, amateur Anthropologist :)

The principle but has been a subject of psychological thinking for a long time. Freud described it as the Oedipus complex and it was a failure to resolve the Oedipus complex that led to male children growing up with pshyco/sexual problems. The female equivalent is the Electra complex but Fraud didn't have much to say about that believing it was not the same for females.

There is some dispute among modern psychologists as to whether the Oedipus complex actually exists but I tend to come down on the side of Freud. He may have been onto something.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oedipus_complex

Susan Williams

Edited 19 Jan 10, 2:28 PM by Susan_Williams

19 Jan 10, 2:46 PM
houseproudest
UK(SE), 4 yrs

if the worst that happens from this literature is that some women feel empowered (be it from 'bad' art or whatever) in ways that are still being protested and discriminated for all over the world then i personally do not have a problem with it..i might cringe at presentational devices..its no greer or Wollstonecroft.. and if it gets people talking about roles and gender then all well and good..

it seems curious to note this text in lieu of the extremely negative images of men at war..there isnt an issue here..

Pavement? Wowee Zowee!

19 Jan 10, 2:53 PM
Ms_Tytania
7 yrs
Captain_Jack wrote:
Women are 'born' to procreate. Procreation is difficult, risky and it's a team effort.

As the female gender is by biological necessity already saddled with certain responsibilities, it's only natural that the other gender ends up with the responsibilities which happen to lend themselves to be more useful in the acquisiton/application of power.

That, again, depends on your definition of what is *power* and *responsibilities*. To say that hunting mammoths and bumming your conquered enemies is a more accurate symbol of power than delivering offspring and raising it within a nurturing family/tribal/pack circle, until an age when they are not in imminent danger of death due to poor nutrition or childhood illnesses, is relative, and of course, gender-biased.

"People are inherently evil, but very, very funny" - Joe Orton.

Edited 19 Jan 10, 2:55 PM by Ms_Tytania

19 Jan 10, 2:56 PM
houseproudest
UK(SE), 4 yrs

gender's problem is that it doesnt even know its been born

Pavement? Wowee Zowee!

19 Jan 10, 2:57 PM
Degenerate*
UK(M), 5 yrs

houseproudest wrote:
gender's problem is that it doesnt even know its been born

:-D

Sign up to CAAN's statement www.caan.org.uk
Spanner Trust SM campaign - can you join in? http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/239250/0

19 Jan 10, 2:57 PM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
Captain_Jack wrote:
Women are 'born' to procreate.

So are men.

As the female gender is by biological necessity already saddled with certain responsibilities, it's only natural that the other gender ends up with the responsibilities which happen to lend themselves to be more useful in the acquisiton/application of power.

How do you explain the egalitarian and non-hierarchical nature of most pre-stone age or indigenous societies (not to mention the examples of matriarchal societies such as pre-celtic Britain)?

But just because we evolved this way biologically
Seem unlikely we evolved any particular way with regards gender roles

doesn't mean we can't redefine the gender roles or even artificially change them now that we have the technology.
Well "we" defined the roles in the first place so they are of course open to be redefined by us.

--- Ha!

19 Jan 10, 3:04 PM
IndelibleMarker
UK(E), 6 yrs


Danbuc wrote:
Captain_Jack wrote:
Women are 'born' to procreate.

So are men.

As the female gender is by biological necessity already saddled with certain responsibilities, it's only natural that the other gender ends up with the responsibilities which happen to lend themselves to be more useful in the acquisiton/application of power.

How do you explain the egalitarian and non-hierarchical nature of most pre-stone age or indigenous societies (not to mention the examples of matriarchal societies such as pre-celtic Britain)?

But just because we evolved this way biologically
Seem unlikely we evolved any particular way with regards gender roles

doesn't mean we can't redefine the gender roles or even artificially change them now that we have the technology.
Well "we" defined the roles in the first place so they are of course open to be redefined by us.

Personally, I'd say you, Danbuc, are making the most sound, valid and useful contributions to the argument by quite some margin so far...

Kisses to all you fabioso people!
Patrick
IM
(Next London U35 Munch Details)

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC