You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Just personal taste? (90)

This post is on the Other BDSM web board.

12 Jan 10, 11:53 AM
Mistress_Avralivia
UK(RG), 4 yrs
£
Why not start a thread in informed debate about this topic, copying our posts across, and you can answer there?

AnEnglishMaster wrote:

I am happy to continue the debate, if you are. And yes, the Informed Debate thread would be better - hence my not saying more now.

As you have suggested we "call an end", please post here whether or not you are willing to continue in a more appropriate forum. I can then address that.

English

Senno Ekto Gamat

12 Jan 10, 6:11 PM
AnEnglishMaster
UK(ME), 5 yrs
Avralivia wrote:
Why not start a thread in informed debate about this topic, copying our posts across, and you can answer there?

AnEnglishMaster wrote:

I am happy to continue the debate, if you are. And yes, the Informed Debate thread would be better - hence my not saying more now.

As you have suggested we "call an end", please post here whether or not you are willing to continue in a more appropriate forum. I can then address that.

English

That was precisely what I was thinking - but I wanted your agreement first.

It may be a day or two - I am very busy at the moment with other things.

Thank you for your agreement.

English

12 Jan 10, 6:27 PM
relaxed1
UK(BR), 6 yrs

saraxx wrote:
Not sure how to answer this as I am not into playing with people on a kink basis. Hypothetically though, If I were to meet someone in relation to a potential new relationship, deal breakers would be:

- racism;

- zealotry (religious, political etc.);

- overt snobbery (including inverse snobbery, which is equally abhorrent); and

- lack of cleanliness.

I agree entirely, though with the addition of:

- bigotry and intolerance

Happily, all of these are rarely encountered (in my experience at least) and are usually detectably from postings or from early exchanges.

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking up at the stars" - Oscar Wilde
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall

12 Jan 10, 6:32 PM
PortionsForFoxes
UK(SE), 5 yrs
A serial monogamist. I find it hard to put my trust in anyone who seems incapable of holding down a relationship for any amount of time.

I say this because I used to be one and man, I wouldn't have trusted me back then.

"You'll be in love till it kills you both. You'll fight and you'll shag and you'll hate each other till it makes you quiver, but you'll never be friends. Love isn't brains, children, it's blood. Blood screaming inside you to work its will. I may be love's bitch, but at least I'm man enough to admit it."

12 Jan 10, 6:34 PM
Masters_Delight
UK(WD), 5 yrs

This thread seems to have gone slightly off topic. I didn't realise it was about religion.

Anyway, back to the question asked..

If they smoked.

I'm so fucking fabulous, i piss glitter. :-D

12 Jan 10, 6:38 PM
Masters_Delight
UK(WD), 5 yrs

KinkyRoly wrote:
I find it amusing that a thread inviting people to mention personal traits which might put them off somebody has allowed certain people to demonstrate personal traits of their own which many will regard as very unattractive.

Too true.

I'm so fucking fabulous, i piss glitter. :-D

12 Jan 10, 6:41 PM
littlemissanna
UK(NW), 5 yrs

I think lying would be the most significant 'no-no' out there. It utterly undermines the trust that I think is fundamental to any D/s relationship or play. How can you play with someone, risk being put or putting someone in a potentially vulnerable situation, if you dont trust them?
22 Jan 10, 7:35 PM
Ms_Tytania
7 yrs
PortionsForFoxes wrote:
A serial monogamist. I find it hard to put my trust in anyone who seems incapable of holding down a relationship for any amount of time.

I say this because I used to be one and man, I wouldn't have trusted me back then.

Wouldn't the right word for what you are referring to be just "fickle" (I used to be one too, yanno : -ok maybe I still am, given the right circumstances). I understand "serial monogamist" as somebody who's been in several monogamous relationships through their lives, irrelevant of the length, and assuming there was sincerity and commitment in them, that is, they could be described as relationships, not flings? Just asking.

"People are inherently evil, but very, very funny" - Joe Orton.

Edited 22 Jan 10, 7:55 PM by Ms_Tytania

22 Jan 10, 11:36 PM
totallycoverme
UK(M), 4 yrs
for me any of the following comments or behaviour send me running;

*someone once said "Aww I was really looking forward to having a go with you" (implying that everyone else has so why not him)

*when it feels like if it wasn't me, they would just as easily dash of with someone else

*if they make any comment that makes me think they might be dangerous or not be approaching bdsm from the same point as me

*if they seem chauvanistic or sexist (genuinely so) towards women and genuinely see them as objects on a day to day basis as part of that.

Right I think that just about rules out all potential Dominants maybe *facepalms*

It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice :)xx

22 Jan 10, 11:41 PM
andrewsean
UK(CO), 5 yrs

Cardigans

Treat problems like a dog would.....If you can't eat it or fuck it, piss on it and walk away.

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC