You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2

YKIOK (16)

This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board.

9 Jan 10, 2:14 PM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 6 yrs

I never understood the hostility and I still don't.

Time to roll out an analogy methinks. A mate of mine owns a car which he drives from A to B and so on, just like most people do with their cars. However he enjoys driving so every so often he blows a wad of cash on renting a fast car for a day on the track and has a damn good time.

Nobody has yet said that the car is faking it and to be honest I don't think it would matter if it was. Some of the guys who rent the car might be able to get a car just as nice, some not, some wouldn't want the hassle of maintaining and insuring such a car even if they could get one.

It's much the same deal. Some guys like a no strings attached treat once in a while. Does that make them worthy of derision? Not in itself. Does it make the people providing that service bad in any way? Again, no.

At first I thought all the anti-PD stuff was the kind of lively and entertaining stuff that makes for fun internets, but at this point the usual suspects are starting to sound like Republican web-warriors or something.

If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, you might want to stop waving that axe around.

9 Jan 10, 2:45 PM
McDelphian
2 yrs
I think that the republican web warriors are questioning the reality of the fast car on the track. Is it a car or an old bike that gets blasted on a sunday by a guy in leather pants Skullfucked smiley)

The peeps that run the "track" are so dishonest that they advise you to cheat on your "car" the kindly old metro that has served you loyally for years.

It's nice that you have shared the odd drink with pro dommes but don't let it cloud your judgement.

Why don't you give up on seeking a relationship and visit pro dommes instead, doghouse?

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
I never understood the hostility and I still don't.

Time to roll out an analogy methinks. A mate of mine owns a car which he drives from A to B and so on, just like most people do with their cars. However he enjoys driving so every so often he blows a wad of cash on renting a fast car for a day on the track and has a damn good time.

Nobody has yet said that the car is faking it and to be honest I don't think it would matter if it was. Some of the guys who rent the car might be able to get a car just as nice, some not, some wouldn't want the hassle of maintaining and insuring such a car even if they could get one.

It's much the same deal. Some guys like a no strings attached treat once in a while. Does that make them worthy of derision? Not in itself. Does it make the people providing that service bad in any way? Again, no.

At first I thought all the anti-PD stuff was the kind of lively and entertaining stuff that makes for fun internets, but at this point the usual suspects are starting to sound like Republican web-warriors or something.

Edited 9 Jan 10, 3:07 PM by McDelphian

9 Jan 10, 9:01 PM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 6 yrs

I hate multiquotes, but I'll give them a go.

McDelphian wrote:
I think that the republican web warriors are questioning the reality of the fast car on the track. Is it a car or an old bike that gets blasted on a sunday by a guy in leather pants Skullfucked smiley)

I don't see why this matters. Is visiting a domme who is secretly a sub with a husband carcinogenic or something? A guy pays his money, if has a good time, what does any of that matter? The guy gets his jollies, he gets to go back to the office, or back to his wife and his kids or whatever and carry on with his day. Maybe she goes back to the kitchen sink, who cares? It's all about that hour.

The peeps that run the "track" are so dishonest that they advise you to cheat on your "car" the kindly old metro that has served you loyally for years.

That points probably been done to death in other threads but to be honest while I don't think trying to coax anybody away from a fulfilling relationship is ethical I've always believed it takes two to tango. If a guy cheats it's on him. You don't blame the sofa when the dog humps it.

It's nice that you have shared the odd drink with pro dommes but don't let it cloud your judgement.

Why don't you give up on seeking a relationship and visit pro dommes instead, doghouse?

You're confusing the notion of 'clouding' with 'informing'. How do you expect to know anything about anything without asking the people involved? And by asking I don't mean leaving a loaded question lying around an internet forum like a paper bag with a poo inside it.

As for why I don't just give up on relationships and visit PDs, well first there's the minor issue of what to do with one. I mean we going to watch the telly or what? A pro sub would be more practical, but I've never been the sort of person to think, "OMFG MUST PADDLE SOMEBODY NOW!"

If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, you might want to stop waving that axe around.

9 Jan 10, 11:32 PM
McDelphian
2 yrs
ah its worked!

McDelphian wrote:
I think that the republican web warriors are questioning the reality of the fast car on the track. Is it a car or an old bike that gets blasted on a sunday by a guy in leather pants Skullfucked smiley)

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
I don't see why this matters. Is visiting a domme who is secretly a sub with a husband carcinogenic or something?

No but if you claim to be a dominant and take money based on this statement it's a bit dishonest if you're a sub isn't it? Do you wear snides? Is your rolex from turkey?

McDelphian wrote:
The peeps that run the "track" are so dishonest that they advise you to cheat on your "car" the kindly old metro that has served you loyally for years.

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
That points probably been done to death in other threads but to be honest while I don't think trying to coax anybody away from a fulfilling relationship is ethical I've always believed it takes two to tango.

Its been done to death because loyalty is important to maintain a healthy relationship. Most peeps are disgusted by cheating but not pro dommes. Its their bread and butter!

Edited 9 Jan 10, 11:36 PM by McDelphian

10 Jan 10, 12:28 AM
Doghouse_Reilly
UK(MK), 6 yrs

And so we enter the game I like to call, Quotebox Jenga. Soon it will come crashing down. But let's see how far we go.

McDelphian wrote:
No but if you claim to be a dominant and take money based on this statement it's a bit dishonest if you're a sub isn't it? Do you wear snides? Is your rolex from turkey?

Thing is a session is not an object, it's a thing that happens. Sure I can see that to you it matters a lot that the experience is totally genuine. But there are clearly a hell of a lot of people who either do not care, or who are happy to live in denial, or who actually are getting the real deal. So where's the harm? You're not Woodward and Bernstein and this is not the greatest conspiracy in the universe, it's capitalism. Raw, dirty, capitalism and it's what makes us better than the animals.

McDelphian wrote:
Its been done to death because loyalty is important to maintain a healthy relationship. Most peeps are disgusted by cheating but not pro dommes. Its their bread and butter!

So what? Seriously where's the big deal here?

Are you an ethical consumer so exacting in your standards that you'll bring the hammer down on the PDs for the damage they do to the Great British Family Unit? I wonder if you're this voracious in your pursuit of Coca Cola for their sometimes lethal anti-union tactics. Or Lockheed Martin for all those cute little orphans with missing limbs their bombs left in Iraq. Or maybe the marketing industry just because let's face it they are all cunts. You got a forum full of rage for them too?

Your quest to deliver as much rage as possible is either madness or Sparta. I have yet to decide which.

If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, you might want to stop waving that axe around.

10 Jan 10, 5:21 PM
McDelphian
2 yrs
I pushed my luck with the last quote box thing so I'll give it a miss.

You're right, it is just capitalism, dirty filthy capitalism but with the added trades and description lies.

I suppose it all depends on whether you are a beggar or a chooser, not wanting to be big headed but compared to a lot of sub males I'm Don Juan. I've had my pick and I can catergorically say that real genuine domintion is better than being dommed by a sub ( however hot the sub is)

it's nice that you are being honest on behalf of the pro dommes because they would never admit to being a sub.. Wonder why??

As a switch I suppose that you have to settle for someone you can skullfuck but who will plonk herself on your boat another night, like I say; fine if you're a switcheroo but it's bullshit if you're 100% sub and this is why pd's never admit to subbing.

Your subby female pals would usually jump on a thread about being dommed by a sub but because they are "friends" with pro dommes they are keeping their distance.

Sparta?? I'm not with you. I just hate how certain sections of ic was being run and censored by pro dommes.

The last straw was when a bunch of sex workers pounced on the poor fella who was skanked by another bunch of pro's

This isn't pro mistresses dot com so I'm fine to question their dishonesty etc.

Obviously they'd love me to get a timeout but the sun shines on the righteous around these parts :)

In sumarry ; Get some genuine action.

Doghouse_Reilly wrote:
And so we enter the game I like to call, Quotebox Jenga. Soon it will come crashing down. But let's see how far we go.

McDelphian wrote:
No but if you claim to be a dominant and take money based on this statement it's a bit dishonest if you're a sub isn't it? Do you wear snides? Is your rolex from turkey?

Thing is a session is not an object, it's a thing that happens. Sure I can see that to you it matters a lot that the experience is totally genuine. But there are clearly a hell of a lot of people who either do not care, or who are happy to live in denial, or who actually are getting the real deal. So where's the harm? You're not Woodward and Bernstein and this is not the greatest conspiracy in the universe, it's capitalism. Raw, dirty, capitalism and it's what makes us better than the animals.

McDelphian wrote:
Its been done to death because loyalty is important to maintain a healthy relationship. Most peeps are disgusted by cheating but not pro dommes. Its their bread and butter!

So what? Seriously where's the big deal here?

Are you an ethical consumer so exacting in your standards that you'll bring the hammer down on the PDs for the damage they do to the Great British Family Unit? I wonder if you're this voracious in your pursuit of Coca Cola for their sometimes lethal anti-union tactics. Or Lockheed Martin for all those cute little orphans with missing limbs their bombs left in Iraq. Or maybe the marketing industry just because let's face it they are all cunts. You got a forum full of rage for them too?

Your quest to deliver as much rage as possible is either madness or Sparta. I have yet to decide which.

Edited 10 Jan 10, 5:23 PM by McDelphian

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC