You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Supply and demand!! Bollocks!! (73)

This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board.

6 Jan 10, 10:40 AM
bohnanza
UK(FK), 12 yrs

Mistress_Sarah_Kane wrote:

In my experince a younger more attractive PD has less experience you can be the most attractive girl in the world but if you cant use equipment, your a danger.

A good Mistress has experince its should not matter how she looks, experience in this game is everything....

I fail to see the connection between experience and ability. Experience only means you have been doing it for quite a while. Go to any golf course and you will see people who are vastly experienced yet crap at playing.

Science, the only religion that works even if you don't believe in it.
Women wanted, preferably with their own Rohypnol.

6 Jan 10, 11:19 AM
lisal
8 yrs
bohnanza wrote:
Mistress_Sarah_Kane wrote:

In my experince a younger more attractive PD has less experience you can be the most attractive girl in the world but if you cant use equipment, your a danger.

A good Mistress has experince its should not matter how she looks, experience in this game is everything....

I fail to see the connection between experience and ability. Experience only means you have been doing it for quite a while. Go to any golf course and you will see people who are vastly experienced yet crap at playing.

Don't disagree bohanza. Yes, in some cases experience is important - you get to know how to use the equipment and how to interact with the sub - but I've been to see some long standing PDs who were okay but had no real empathy

The best domme I've ever seen (and still see) had little experience when I started sessioning with her but loads of natural ability and empathy and loves doing what she does

There's no real right or wrong here. The most important thing is compatability both in type and style of play and on a personal level

6 Jan 10, 11:28 AM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
bohnanza wrote:
Mistress_Sarah_Kane wrote:

In my experince a younger more attractive PD has less experience you can be the most attractive girl in the world but if you cant use equipment, your a danger.

A good Mistress has experince its should not matter how she looks, experience in this game is everything....

I fail to see the connection between experience and ability. Experience only means you have been doing it for quite a while. Go to any golf course and you will see people who are vastly experienced yet crap at playing.

Yeah all those hours concert pianists put in don't count at all.

Not that I agree that ever increasing experience always adds up to more ability.

--- Ha!

6 Jan 10, 12:23 PM
MissKimberley_1
NL, 2 yrs
£
Mistress_Sarah_Kane wrote:

In my experince a younger more attractive PD has less experience you can be the most attractive girl in the world but if you cant use equipment, your a danger.

A good Mistress has experince its should not matter how she looks, experience in this game is everything....

Looks perhaps shouldn't matter, the fact is that they do. A PD without photos of herself on her site would attract less people because overall, looks are part of the package you're selling.

As for age vs. experience, I have seen some great young Dommes whose skill and personality matched if not exceeded some older, more experienced ones. It also depends how old you are when you start doing this stuff, I have been doing this for 10 years. There are others who are the same age who have only just started.

As for experience alone, that doesn't mean a great deal. Some people are naturally better at some things than others, some invest a lot of time and often money into learning, others don't. And there is something else: people's preferences. You might be fantastic with the cane but if the sub wants to be fucked up the arse like a sissybitch then all your cane skills aren't going to help you.

6 Jan 10, 12:31 PM
LacednLicked
UK(WA), 4 yrs
Danbuc wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
You started a sentence with And...

I wish dearly that people would stop regurgitating Strunk & White as though they know what they are talking about. Starting sentences with and is a perfectly correct grammatical construct in English; And it's been commonly used in written English since the emergence of Middle English (see also splitting infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions).

I doubt any contemporary style guides prohibit starting sentences with and and trying to enforce a style guide's choices as actual rules of grammar is plain stupid.

Nice one, you got my gal horny reading that!

On another note, The Veyron is actually produced at a loss. Not sure how that fits in the analogy CWK was creating?

6 Jan 10, 1:20 PM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
LacednLicked wrote:
Nice one, you got my gal horny reading that!

Arf. It was the semicolon wasn't it?

--- Ha!

6 Jan 10, 2:33 PM
McDelphian
2 yrs
it's incorrect. Gawd knows what private school you attended ( bit of lacrosse going on?)but our English teacher Mr Brooks didn't advise it.

Maybe it's a comprehensive thing.

I'm sure if you google search "can you start a sentence with and" it will agree with Mr Brooks.

LacednLicked wrote:
Danbuc wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
You started a sentence with And...

I wish dearly that people would stop regurgitating Strunk & White as though they know what they are talking about. Starting sentences with and is a perfectly correct grammatical construct in English; And it's been commonly used in written English since the emergence of Middle English (see also splitting infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions).

I doubt any contemporary style guides prohibit starting sentences with and and trying to enforce a style guide's choices as actual rules of grammar is plain stupid.

Nice one, you got my gal horny reading that!

On another note, The Veyron is actually produced at a loss. Not sure how that fits in the analogy CWK was creating?

6 Jan 10, 2:43 PM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
McDelphian wrote:
it's incorrect. Gawd knows what private school you attended ( bit of lacrosse going on?)but our English teacher Mr Brooks didn't advise it.

Maybe it's a comprehensive thing.

I'm sure if you google search "can you start a sentence with and" it will agree with Mr Brooks.

It's got nothing to do with which school I did or didn't attend and everything to do with knowing a small amount about linguistics. Nevertheless Noam and Shakespeare are on my side as are the first handful of entries on searching google for "Can I start a sentence with a conjunction"

http://www.kerryr.net/webwriting/gpwu_grammar.ht...

http://editingpublishing.suite101.com/article.cf...

http://www.gpuss.co.uk/english_usage/start_sente...

--- Ha!

Edited 6 Jan 10, 2:44 PM by AstronautMikeDexter

6 Jan 10, 2:52 PM
McDelphian
2 yrs
Can I start a sentence with and? google says no.

Danbuc wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
it's incorrect. Gawd knows what private school you attended ( bit of lacrosse going on?)but our English teacher Mr Brooks didn't advise it.

Maybe it's a comprehensive thing.

I'm sure if you google search "can you start a sentence with and" it will agree with Mr Brooks.

It's got nothing to do with which school I did or didn't attend and everything to do with knowing a small amount about linguistics. Nevertheless Noam and Shakespeare are on my side as are the first handful of entries on searching google for "Can I start a sentence with a conjunction"

http://www.kerryr.net/webwriting/gpwu_grammar.ht...

http://editingpublishing.suite101.com/article.cf...

http://www.gpuss.co.uk/english_usage/start_sente...

6 Jan 10, 2:57 PM
AstronautMikeDexter
UK(E), 2 yrs
McDelphian wrote:
Can I start a sentence with and?

Ok, I just googled that phrase (both as a literal string and as a string of words) top link that comes back:

http://editingpublishing.suite101.com/article.cf...

And I quote

The good news is that the rules are changing and it is now considered acceptable to start a sentence with a conjunction.

ETA: And another link that comes close to the top of the results contains this quote

That it is a solecism to begin a sentence with and is a faintly lingering superstition. The OED gives examples ranging from the 10th to the 19th c.; the Bible is full of them.

http://www.dailywritingtips.com/can-you-start-se...

--- Ha!

Edited 6 Jan 10, 3:00 PM by AstronautMikeDexter

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

UK BDSM Awards 2011

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC