Tue 5 Jan 10, 8:17 AM Miss_serena 4 yrs |
Dear Admin,
I am very curious about the use of the Pro Mistress board , there seems to be a group of people who take pleasure in jumping on anything that is said ..could we have some definition of the main use of the board to clear it up ..many thanks x owned , happy and contented.x
|
5 Jan 10, 8:25 AM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs

|
The definition is at the top of the page.
| Discussion of the commercial domination, professional mistresses, dominatrixes, dommes, subs etc scene in the UK. Subjects relating to pro-topping, pro-bottoming and BDSM-for-money services offered by men or women are all on-topic for this board, including business to business ads and event ads where staff members are paid to do BDSM, but this is not the place to post adverts for one-to-one services to customers. The Mistress Index lists banners (for free!) from mistresses who are members of IC. |
It doesn't cover personal ads for non-fee situations.
Some people hang around the Pro board just so they can criticise everything we do. I think it should be recognised as a valid fetish  "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.clips4sale.com/studio/26308
http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/
http://www.professionaldomination.co.uk
|
5 Jan 10, 8:36 AM Miss_serena 4 yrs |
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
The definition is at the top of the page.
| Discussion of the commercial domination, professional mistresses, dominatrixes, dommes, subs etc scene in the UK. Subjects relating to pro-topping, pro-bottoming and BDSM-for-money services offered by men or women are all on-topic for this board, including business to business ads and event ads where staff members are paid to do BDSM, but this is not the place to post adverts for one-to-one services to customers. The Mistress Index lists banners (for free!) from mistresses who are members of IC. |
It doesn't cover personal ads for non-fee situations.
Some people hang around the Pro board just so they can criticise everything we do. I think it should be recognised as a valid fetish
|
thanks hun, I am sick of the bloody idiots on there who jump at every post that is made.Sarah has not breached this statement.. owned , happy and contented.x
|
5 Jan 10, 2:24 PM McDelphian 2 yrs |
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
|
5 Jan 10, 2:54 PM Miss_serena 4 yrs |
McDelphian wrote:
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
| explain?
owned , happy and contented.x
|
5 Jan 10, 3:16 PM SheilaBlyge UK(S), 4 yrs 
 |
sub_serena wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
| explain?
|
There's no explanation Serena, it's just Delphy's pre-programmed Replybot that stalks Lady_Anna's posts. Quite a clever piece of software, but some readers do wish he'd program in a sense of humour and a bit of variety in the responses. |
5 Jan 10, 3:22 PM MissKimberley_1 NL, 2 yrs £ 
 |
sub_serena wrote:
Lady_Anna_Bradford wrote:
The definition is at the top of the page.
| Discussion of the commercial domination, professional mistresses, dominatrixes, dommes, subs etc scene in the UK. Subjects relating to pro-topping, pro-bottoming and BDSM-for-money services offered by men or women are all on-topic for this board, including business to business ads and event ads where staff members are paid to do BDSM, but this is not the place to post adverts for one-to-one services to customers. The Mistress Index lists banners (for free!) from mistresses who are members of IC. |
It doesn't cover personal ads for non-fee situations.
Some people hang around the Pro board just so they can criticise everything we do. I think it should be recognised as a valid fetish
|
thanks hun, I am sick of the bloody idiots on there who jump at every post that is made.Sarah has not breached this statement..
|
Perhaps a return to the group might stop the trolls? It seemed to work.
professional BDSM guidelines wrote:
With regard to the Group and posting on the "Pro-Mistresses Etc" Board, the @professional_BDSM profile owners - @Lady_Anna_Bradford, @Ms_Tytania, @Mistress_Susannah, @Mistress_Sapphire, @LadyPandoraCP, and @MistressKeene are all agreed that we (us seven) will take an active part in the discussions on all areas of IC apart from the "Pro-Mistresses Etc" Board - unless to post links to articles or discussions within the @professional_BDSM group or suggesting the OP does a search of his/her subject on the forum. As members of the group, we will not demand that you do the same, but we would seriously urge you to follow our lead. We simply ask you to join us and support us by avoiding getting into discussions on the "Pro-Mistresses Etc" Board where we are open to attack from trolling and instead enjoying healthy discussions with the group.
|
|
5 Jan 10, 3:46 PM McDelphian 2 yrs |
Sense of humour? Srsly, I'm the funniest person in your life. When I mocked your obvious fake online age I heard the knowing guffaws from miles around.
SheilaBlyge wrote:
sub_serena wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
| explain?
|
There's no explanation Serena, it's just Delphy's pre-programmed Replybot that stalks Lady_Anna's posts. Quite a clever piece of software, but some readers do wish he'd program in a sense of humour and a bit of variety in the responses.
|
|
5 Jan 10, 3:49 PM wonderer UK, 5 yrs 
 |
McDelphian wrote:
...
When I mocked your obvious fake online age I heard the knowing guffaws from miles around.
...
|
Some people have no manners.
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/
|
5 Jan 10, 3:50 PM McDelphian 2 yrs |
There are certain things that pro dom/mes don't like talking about such as how in real life they sub or how the paid for domination you receive from said submissives is fake and only for the dollar dollar.
It used to be that they could silence peeps by ganging up, getting pathetic male subs to post in their favour etc etc.
These days you can post what you like. My present to ic.
sub_serena wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
| explain?
|
|
5 Jan 10, 3:58 PM chrisp UK(E), 6 yrs  |
McDelphian wrote:
There are certain things that pro dom/mes don't like talking about such as how in real life they sub or how the paid for domination you receive from said submissives is fake and only for the dollar dollar.
It used to be that they could silence peeps by ganging up, getting pathetic male subs to post in their favour etc etc.
These days you can post what you like. My present to ic.
sub_serena wrote:
McDelphian wrote:
So basically.. You are free to discuss anything with even a tenuous link to cash for tricks.
| explain?
| So you think ALL Prodommes are really subs. Must be great to have such wide knowledge.c |
|