This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.
This post is on the Other BDSM web board.
| 4 Jan 10, 12:48 PM ConsciousnessJunkie UK(N), 5 yrs   |
What is there to discuss? Some people like fat chicks, some like skinny chicks. It's personal preference. Personally I don't find the women in the above shots particually attractive due to their size, although I think the photography, lighting and retouching is very good. | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 12:50 PM Demimonde UK(NW), 3 yrs |
Beautiful! If you want larger and more fetishistic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfwG-PxBvSc | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 12:57 PM bohnanza UK(FK), 12 yrs |
In other words: photoshopped to fuck pictures look good. We have no idea what the original models looked like, were they fat or thin or maybe even male? Science, the only religion that works even if you don't believe in it. | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 1:01 PM Teacher1357 UK(LS), 2 yrs |
Well much as I can agree with Lady_Anna here I think the important thing is that girls of all sizes are just as interested in 'the thing we do.' So don't take this as criticism in any way but curvy girls can be very lovely and with a well proprtioned bottom there is more to work on is there not. I have always found curvy girls to be very cuddly not that slim janes are any less so. The true beauty lies within of course.
Good thread though.
| ||
| 4 Jan 10, 1:03 PM Hypnotist UK(RG), 3 yrs |
Photoshopped crap. Mind you, I did just cum a little bit. Phwwwwooooaarrrr. | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 1:21 PM Beau_Tox UK(CB), 7 yrs  |
LOL You've been on the website for 3 years... Surely you know it's *far* more than just a matter of personal preference. ETA: I think the models look gorgeous. Well yeah, there will be some photoshoppage, but there always is. Then again, as we're used to looking at photoshopped models everywhere else, the playing field is actually pretty level. * * * Edited 4 Jan 10, 1:24 PM by Beau_Tox | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 1:24 PM ConsciousnessJunkie UK(N), 5 yrs |
Sorry... photoshopped CRAP? These are possibly one of the most beautifully done and refined photohopped images I've seen in a long time! Clearly they are meant to have that slight classic, painted pin up feel to the shots, so the photoshopping here is entirely appropriate! It's not CRAP! This retouchers photoshop skills are AMAZING! | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 1:34 PM steved14 UK(TW), 5 yrs |
| ||
| 4 Jan 10, 2:01 PM Hypnotist UK(RG), 3 yrs |
Oh, come on. Definitely photoshopped crap. Just look at that first one. Plasticy, dehumanized...urghh urghhhh urrrrrhhhhhggggghhhh.......doll-like curvy artificial plaything....uuuurrrrhhhggghhh...gasp...gasp... [sound of meat slapping]..... I'll brb. Just got to have some "me time" now.... Edited 4 Jan 10, 2:04 PM by Hypnotist | ||
| 4 Jan 10, 2:04 PM SheilaBlyge UK(S), 4 yrs |
It's not often I disagree with you MissFelicity, but I have to here, simply because we ARE talking about personal preferences as you said earlier, and subjective opinions. My subjective opinion has always been that a retoucher isn't up to much if the image is very obviously retouched and so far beyond what was originally there that is more graphic art than photo. That is my personal benchmark, and I won't judge a photo as a photo (and hence the model as a model) if that is the case. I will however, judge it as a piece of art, and some of these images I like very much because they are quirky, and I do agree about the slightly painted pin-up feel. Although for some reason I can't get Miss Piggy out of my head with that first one, the full naked one.
|
