Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

KICKED OUT OF A IC MUNCH!! (94)

This thread is now full, and replying is disabled.

Replies

30 Dec 09, 9:16 AM
polly_uk
UK, 7 yrs

DanesWood wrote:

Of course we've only heard the negatives about this person and the way he ran the munch that particular night, but as an indicator of his behaviour generally I think it speaks volumes, as apparently so do many other people.

As for breaking the AUP, I don't see anywhere that the person is named, perhaps the only people who'd know are those who attend the munch or know those who do.

I'm sure eventually this persons reputation will be his undoing, if what is more than hinted at in these posts is true.

I had no difficulty in identifying the person referred to. I do not attend the ELM, know nobody (as far as I am aware) that attends and haven't seen the person referred to in years thus I would agree that this post breaks the AUP.

I agree with you that we have indeed only heard negatives about the person but fail to see how this incident then becomes an indicator of his behaviour generally.

You are right again that it is all hints...smoke and mirrors, but nobody raises their reputation by lowering others and I fail to see how anyone has gained anything by this post.

Regards,

Polly

"Indifference to me, is the epitome of evil. Be a sound not an echo"

Edited 30 Dec 09, 9:24 AM by polly_uk

30 Dec 09, 9:24 AM
MissP
UK(EN), 8 yrs

cheekydevil wrote:

Paula, Mirror, mirror on the wall

Humble, how many times do you have to be banned I wonder??

For the record ladies and gents, this person is banned from IC for numerous reasons, some of which he carried through to actual events in real life.

He has set up several fake profiles, which he continues to post with.

www.thedivinemissp.co.uk

30 Dec 09, 9:27 AM
Betony
UK, 7 yrs

polly_uk wrote:

I had no difficulty in identifying the person referred to. I do not attend the ELM, know nobody (as far as I am aware that attends) and haven't seen the person referred to in years thus I would agree that this post breaks the AUP.

I agree with you that we have indeed only heard negatives about the person but fail to see how this incident then becomes an indicator of his behaviour generally.

I agree re AUP. I've never been to a munch or a club in my

life, but I knew who this referred to straight away.

30 Dec 09, 9:27 AM
MissP
UK(EN), 8 yrs

DanesWood wrote:

MissP wrote:
Loads of stuff

Interesting, for someone who professes to have no interest in this you've portrayed yourself as antagonistic, patronising,and unsympathetic. You've also had an awful lot to say about something you want no involvement with or have no interest in.

What can I say, it's dead at work this week. I was kinda hoping common sense would prevail in this issue, but it clearly isn't, so I'll join in til it's chip paper

DanesWood wrote:

As for breaking the AUP, I don't see anywhere that the person is named, perhaps the only people who'd know are those who attend the munch or know those who do.

You honestly, really can't identify the man with a stick who runs the East London Munch????? How many can there be??!!

I got a DS Lite for crimbo, and I think I'll go play that now.

www.thedivinemissp.co.uk

30 Dec 09, 9:32 AM
ThedaVamp
UK, 6 yrs

MissP wrote:

cheekydevil wrote:

Paula, Mirror, mirror on the wall

Humble, how many times do you have to be banned I wonder??

For the record ladies and gents, this person is banned from IC for numerous reasons, some of which he carried through to actual events in real life.

He has set up several fake profiles, which he continues to post with.

Miss P, I do wonder about how bored these people must be in their real lives. Banhammer! Not that it'll do much good sadly.

Perverted Pederast Puppetmistress Pimp Pandering to the Patriarchy... apparently