| Thought_Policeman |
Why is it that some people on this site insist upon conducting their dysfunctional cluster-fuck relationships via weblogs here? I'll tell you why.
You see, they may read their own posts as heartfelt and sincere expressions of love, devotion, whatever, but that's not what I read at all.
A weblog is an expression of thoughts intended for a wide audience, so when someone chooses to express their purported feelings for another via such a medium it makes it abundantly clear that they in fact care far more about the audience than about the person whom they claim to address. If that were not the case then they would send memos, letters, or even pick up the phone. But no, they don't. And why? Because they don't give a shit about the other person. They don't care about expressing love, but rather about being seen to express it. They're more interested in being seen as the hero or the heroine; the victim or the saviour; the princess in the tower or the knight on the white charger.
So folks, the next time you're feeling your heartstrings plucked by some open weblog lament directed at a supposed loved one put away the violins and the poetry. No matter how much they profess to love the other person, they love themselves and, especially, the glare of the spotlight far more.
Edited Thu 24 Dec 09, 7:07 PM by Thought_Policeman
| 23 Dec 09, 2:02 AM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
Whoops. Apparently I forgot to make stuff visible here. Fixed. I'll drag my reply over here so as to keep the discussion to one weblog:
But they're such fun! You make the mistake of believing that I am advising people not to read these pieces, when in fact I advise simply not falling for the displays.
Writing direct messages to individuals for the whole world to see as a form of catharsis? That seems far less likely than it being a form of passive-aggressive display. Even a control mechanism.
Yes, they can, and if that's the case then the correspondent should take the hint and STFU, because if that is what is going on then the weblogs can be considered harassment. There's a certain person on here, and people will know exactly whom I mean, who specialises in harassing someone through open address weblogs. It's not welcome, especially for the target. However, blocked lines of communication are almost never the driving force in these cases. In reality these exchanges take place in the public domain almost invariably because both participants crave attention and affirmation. They want to be seen to be in the right, or to be indulging in enough self-flagellation to be deemed forgivable when they've been in the wrong, often to the point of wannabe martyrdom. Most importantly though, they're a control mechanism: 'People agree with me' or 'No-one is disagreeing with me' and so the display becomes a pressure point upon the other party. I think that these displays are fascinating and often highly enjoyable, in much the same way that reading a good piece of melodrama can be. I encourage all to bear witness to the performances. Just don't fall for the crap. Edited 23 Dec 09, 2:21 AM by Thought_Policeman | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 9:46 AM katie_may UK, 7 yrs |
bit pretentious how can you be sure you know whats really going on? in writers/readers or antagonists mind public displays of love have been going on for centuaries... it's not a weblog thing, some of us find it refreshing in this world of hate/greed and shit
and as for the erm antagonist going around on some attention seeking, self flagillation crap or whatever
the bloggs that really get me are the ones of those who are so up their own arse, that they think they know everything that is going on in everyones mind and action show me something different xkx | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 9:58 AM ThedaVamp UK, 6 yrs |
The nastier side of it is when one person requests no contact from the other and the other feels the need to sidestep the request by openly blogging because they are so desperate to control, get a reaction and have the last word. It's a total lack of respect for a person's wishes.
Perverted Pederast Puppetmistress Pimp Pandering to the Patriarchy... apparently | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 12:25 PM JudyInDsGuise UK(E), 9 yrs |
Why didn't you memo the bloggers concerned to tell them this? (Sorry, couldn't resist!) judy I must be only one in a million (© David Bowie) | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 12:33 PM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
People are really quite predictable and these specimens are especially obvious because they go on and on for months about their fucked-up affairs, making sure that every single moment of it is documented in full public view. If they weren't attention whores they would keep the minutiae of their private lives, you know, private.
This isn't love poetry or serenading below a maiden's bedroom window that we're talking about here. The 'relationships' are drama-laden clusterfucks and the weblogs are dedicated to arguments, apologies, break-ups, et al: The sort of stuff that people who aren't drama-crazed fucknuts tend to keep to themselves.
Theda gets it. ^
And miss the chance for public drama? That's UNPOSSIBLE! Edited 23 Dec 09, 12:35 PM by Thought_Policeman | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 1:19 PM FairyGirl UK(YO), 3 yrs |
Some people are attention whores. "Nothing saves anyone's life, Sir. It just postpones their death." - Posner , The History Boys. | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 8:22 PM whosthatgirl UK(SE), 5 yrs |
And others just express themselves in their own way as they feel like doing at the time I agree with others that it's a bit arrogant and presumptious to assume that you know exactly the motivation behind someone's posts/blogs when you don't even know them.
| ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 9:01 PM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
You overlook the fact that in constantly pissing their personal lives up the public wall these people guarantee that everyone knows they rather well. Indeed, that seems to be their great desire.
| ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 9:12 PM whosthatgirl UK(SE), 5 yrs |
I don't overlook it, I just don't agree with you. Just because someone wears their heart on their sleeve on here and expresses themselves in ways that you wouldn't... doesn't mean you're going to know them intimately, and certainly not enough (imo of course) to read so much sinister stuff into their motivation for posting. I just think some people need to find an outlet to get things off their chest before they can move on. | ||||
| 23 Dec 09, 9:27 PM Thought_Policeman UK(SO), 2 yrs |
Except they don't move on. These people post over and over again.
So let's consider an equivalent act: Someone calls their ex-lover and 'bares their soul' declaring love and revealing much about both themselves and the other person. However, they choose to do this from their office in a major supermarket and to broadcast this over the tannoy for all to hear their dirty little secrets. Act of love and kindness? |