Humiliating, Sadistic, or just a step too far? (28)

Great point well put, but the post is more aimed at the over stepping of a sub's principles and boundaries, not the mere humiliation. The dog food post was what made me think, but I also maentioned any meat really.

From the posts so far, it is seen to be about the consent and what has been agreed, so to help it carry on; same theme of the vegetarian, is it morally wrong to over step that mark for your own gain in seeing the sub struggle, or is there and agreeance of respecting limits?

Lol, now you've opened whole new can of worms, hehe - do you put Quorn in there?? lol

Personally, yes. I'm not in the slightest into watersports but if I had to choose I'd find eating dog food worse. You can wash your skin and hair clean but once you eat something part of its going to be absorbed into your system, even if you puke it straight back up.

Man, I couldn't eat dog food or anything vile actually.

"It is never too late to be what you might have been." ~ George Eliot
"How many cares one loses when one decides not to be something but to be someone" ~ Coco Chanel
'The more I read, the more I meditate; and the more I acquire the more certain I am that I know nothing.' Voltaire

I just don't think you can generalize. Some people who submit are committed to doing it from the foundation of who they are. I'm one of those.

Others are committed to subverting who they are entirely to the will of the dominant.

I would guess that any amorality comes into play when the dominant understands the submissive's boundaries of personality and then disregards them. But if the submissive complies, then was it really a boundary? Sometimes, a little pushing and prodding of boundaries to test their strength is a way of keeping things interesting. Sometimes, it's a violation. It just all depends on the people involved, doesn't it?

love the brave but avoid cowards, knowing the gratitude of cowards is small ~Praxilla of Sicyon

know of a lady who has done this sub really wanted to do it but she wasnt that nasty so fed him stewing meat

although i know of another lady who has served a dog food " meat pie" to her ex lol but she is not on the scene

Yes.

Wouldn't work would it as veggies wouldnt have agreed to eating it in the 1st place.

..and it's not sadistic, its just plain stupid on the Dom's part! a belief is a belief, hard limit!

Voluptuary x

"Sucia" - Spanish for "Dirty Girl"

Complete nonsense. Tinned pet food has to be fit for human consumption in case a human accidently eats it. It is also QC tested by a human.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness http://www.clips4sale.com/studio/26308 http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/index.php http://www.professionaldomination.co.u

yup it's the food from Iceland you have to worry about