22 Nov 09, 9:33 PM
spirifer
UK, 6 yrs
 |
FairyGirl wrote:
spirifer wrote:
jules9 wrote:
Okay, be honest now. Is this weblog in any way aimed at me? Given the threads to refer to, it's hard to see how it isn't... It's a rather sly and pathetic attempt to belittle me, without actually considering anything I have said properly.
I have repeatedly said I am pro equal rights - my argument is simply that people pushing too hard, too fast constantly, only damage the cause that they support. If I hate cripples I then also by definition hate myself. My disability is time dependant. Some days I can walk, others I can't. Some days I can use stairs, others I can't. I don't have a wheelchair, but I regularly have to be sure there is a disabled toilet available, as I can't use a normal one.
As for kids, I love them, pure and simple. The fact I don't think they should be present at munches has no bearing on that whatsoever.
|
Only partly. The responses to DM's thread really shocked me. No-one (apart from DM) appeared to have any understanding of the duty to make "reasonable adjustments" under the DDA, and the bank's total failure to do so.
So all the rubbish about using "public money" to improve access was something of a red herring, but the apparent number of people who would prefer that their money wasn't used to improve the lot of their fellow citizens did shock me.
But then, I have been so shocked in the past at how many pervs are such reactionary rightwing fucktards, I wonder why I am indeed still shocked. 
|
From the information I gathered from the posts on that weblog, I did agree with the majority. But then, that's another thread. The case in the OP seemed to be almost laughable by the time all the points for and against had been considered.
|
Really? Well do enlighten us on your opinion of the Court of Appeal's interpretation of the DDA? I'm sure those of us that actually have a grasp of the legislation are agog at the prospect of a legal dissection of the Court's judgment... The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation - Pierre Trudeau
A denizen of a right little, tight little island.
|
23 Nov 09, 5:04 PM
picksy
UK(PL), 4 yrs
|
spero wrote:
picksy wrote:
And who decides who is a fuckwit ?
|
No one can definitively because it's often a personal opinion but sometimes there's a general consensus. Indeed, one mans fuckwit could easily be considered as anothers jewel of sparking wit, repartee and general insightful intelligence.
Perhaps trolling, fuckwittery and HNGism should be considered as legitimate fetishes in themselves?
|
Thats a good answer ! I'm not you type , i'm not inflatable x
|
