Posted by Ariane on Fri 6 Nov 09, 8:04 PM to Ariane's blog.
Ok, a little good advice for aspiring slaves.
I know there are sometimes good reasons for people to keep their face off a site like this.
BUT
For the nth time, I've just read a profile for someone who could have possibilities, but has no photo whatsoever.
I'm not all that shallow really, but there are parameters for anyone. I hesitate to contact someone like this because, what if he is really not my type to a degree I can't reconcile, or even completely hideous?
Most of the time, people are perfectly acceptable at least. But the danger that a girl might invite attention from an escapee from a Lovecraft novel has a way of inhibiting risk taking.
There are ways of getting a visual image across without plastering your face in front of your workmates.
Arty photos, a good description, there are options. By arty I don't mean a pic of your favourite Mistress fantasy, that's an automatic reject. The creative mind can do wonders with angles and shadows, giving an impression without revealing an identity.
And I do love a creative mind.
I might be happy with Mr fat and average, but without the photo, there is that niggle that it could be Jabba the Hut.
Yes, I'm moaning about the adverts again. I feel like I'm groping in the dark.
| 6 Nov 09, 8:07 PM BarbieSlutLoki UK(E), 6 yrs  |
Many people have jobs that make it difficult to be recognisable on the internet It doesn't mean they're not worth knowing I get the opposite I see people and wonder whether Im considering them just because they're attractive rather than having a more emotional or mental attraction behind it
The first rule of Brat Club, we don't talk about Brat Club... Edited 6 Nov 09, 8:09 PM by BarbieSlutLoki | |
| 6 Nov 09, 8:25 PM Ariane 8 yrs |
I do understand that. My last sub had a drawing he found on the internet, yet that had a certain relation to him. For the female in this world, the risk is often high. You can find yourself getting stalked all too easily, and first contact is very encouraging to someone. More so to the wrong kind. | |
| 6 Nov 09, 8:27 PM Sub_Male1706 3 yrs  |
Also I am having trouble shrinking my photographs for IC profile. As I am not a computer buff
| |
| 6 Nov 09, 8:38 PM subterranean UK, 8 yrs |
I'm ok, provided I don't walk around with an S10 respirator on! | |
| 6 Nov 09, 8:54 PM tom_tom UK(PO), 7 yrs  |
I wouldn't contact someone who didn't have a photo either, you might end up with Ye Liveliest Awfulness. If you're worried about being recognised you're probably best off photoshopping a picture of yourself, or use something like BeFunky to cartoonify yourself. Da Vinci was a well known sexual deviant. You know that sketch of the naked man in the wheel? Blueprints for a rape machine. | |
| 6 Nov 09, 8:57 PM picksy UK(PL), 4 yrs |
And just whats wrong with Jabba ? Follow your dreams ! ....Except the one where you are naked in church . | |
| 6 Nov 09, 9:14 PM Jahc99 UK, 5 yrs |
Crop yer 'ead off, shots from behind, wear a hood, easy. Or go Clanger. Just don't rip off other people's copyright work! | |
| 6 Nov 09, 9:27 PM tanken UK(NR), 2 yrs |
How do you know if a profile photo is recent, a true likeness, or even of the person themselves? Chances are a homicidal maniac would put a 'nice' photo of someone else on their profile or they may just look harmless to the camera after all. "Red hair and black leather is my favourite colour scheme" - Richard Thompson | |
| 7 Nov 09, 10:47 AM Ariane 8 yrs |
Send me a copy and I'll shrink it in Photoshop. mistressariane@yahoo.co.uk
| |
| 7 Nov 09, 10:48 AM Ariane 8 yrs |
But is that you in the photo? |
