Predicament bondage (20)

Can anybody provide any recommendations as to a Mistress or Mistress/Master combination skilled in the art of predicament bondage? Having been introduced to the some "Insex" videos recently this has got my imagination flowing.

Locationwise, the North West, Midlands, West Midlands works best for me. I am looking ideally for somebody who can provide a service outside of 9 to 5.

Thanks in anticipation.

C.

www.mistresssusannah.co.uk

My understanding of the term is a bondage designed to create a predicament for the sub around relieving tension or pain in one part of the body at the expense of tension or pain in another.

This means the sub must have the freedom to make choice: to favour twisted arms against strained thighs, for instance, or to favour aching calves against tension in the tied wrists.

Penny x

Here's another, particularly silly one! ==>>

Others play on balance a lot - one leg down semi suspensions and that sort of thing, right on the edge of falling, even though you can't, can be quite some headfuck. Others still are those delicious positions which one endures moment by moment, and those can take many forms - there's one of me in a stress position in a cage on my profile, for example.

I would have recommended May Thorn, as she is absolutely brilliant at this kind of restraint, and we double dom of course. But we are south west, so not really the right neck of the woods. It's a shame, world class female riggers are a relative rarity.

Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you?
The antidote to whinge threads...?

Edited 26 Aug 09, 8:02 PM by Jahc99

Jahc99, I will send you a private memo.

Well you see my idea of predicament bondage is something quite different. Tied so that you have to be on tiptoes for a while..... or tied just far enough away from something that you really want.... like a kiss from Mistress!!

That's why I asked what the op had in mind.

www.mistresssusannah.co.uk

Exactly. A predicament isn't always a choice between discomfort and discomfort. It can be a tease too. I've tied subs up tight and then told them they can worship my body...if they can reach... It really does test your ability to tie a sub securely

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/ http://www.clips4sale.com/store/26308 http://ladyannadominatrix.c4slive.com/

Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you?
The antidote to whinge threads...?

'Predicament' I take to mean the sub HAS a predicament, rather than is IN a predicament.

IN a predicament, the sub may be in discomfort or unable to reach something craved. But to HAVE a predicament, the sub must have choices: this pain or that, that extra discomfort in order to get that reward, this reward or that reward, this punishment or that punishment.

Penny x

Disciplinary and conventional therapy and life coaching My blog-spot: Primalism

Semantics, semantics, semantics..... in or has.... both are vaild forms of predicament bondage - which again, is why I asked what the OP specifically had in mind.

www.mistresssusannah.co.uk

Who cares? Isn't that the great thing about BDSM - that we can all have our own interpretations of things? Well done to Mistress Susannah and Lady Anna for giving a slant to "predicament bondage" that isn't often mentioned

Some people are like slinkies ... they don't really have a purpose, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs
Some people say I'm a bitch, that's just not true - I have the heart and soul of a kind and gentle person ... in a jar, on my desk, next to my cane.

Edited 2 Sep 09, 9:45 AM by LadyPandoraCP