A Moral Question (92)

But clients don't ask. Most are gentleman enough that they don't want to offend anyone. They also don't want their doubts confirmed. They ask other PDs instead which puts us in the awkward position of disclosure. I've confirmed one or two because I'm not prepared to lie.

Most clients want to know.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/ http://www.clips4sale.com/store/26308

Whilst I'm not a PD, I have had quite a few lovers tell me how much they prefer my natural breasts and how disillusioned they feel when they've found previous partners breasts to be manufactured. So yes, those feelings *are* out there, it's just a matter of scale. I've also been told by one of my friends who has implants that guys have told her how much they prefer them to natural breasts - the point being that *IF* there's a moral obligation (as per the OP) to reveal stuff, why not *all* stuff?

judy

I must be only one in a million (© David Bowie)

Yeah but you're talking about a relationship where I assume you touch each other a lot. Not many PDs allow clients to massage, suck, lick, fondle etc etc their breasts, and if they do they usually make a point of saying what bra size they are and if they are natural or not. You get extra points if your large breasts are natural.

You really can't compare gender-realignment surgery to fake boobs, or fake nails or hair extensions...or what...laser eye correction...false eyelashes...where would you suggest it ends?

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/ http://www.clips4sale.com/store/26308

The road, may be bumpy , but it still leads us to our destination. Love conquers all, and makes the heart come alive

I'd be quite interested to know whether they'd just taken up plumbing or had years of experience.

And we're talking of activities more personal, complex and intimaite than mending waterpipes.

Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/

I'd be more interested in if they were qualified; the amount of experience they've had in fixing a leaky pipe is irrelevant to me and if everyone insisted on years of experience the plumbing trade would die out.

Tanos said *any* professional, and my response was to him.

judy

I must be only one in a million (© David Bowie)

I'd suggest that it doesn't end, because it shouldn't start. Foisting personal morals onto another person seldom works.

judy

I must be only one in a million (© David Bowie)

Trust you

judy

I must be only one in a million (© David Bowie)

All relevant stuff I think. And what is relevant is a highly subjective judgement. But I think this thread has shown that for pro-Domme sessions (and especially repeated sessions - thanks lisal) it is relevant to a significant proportion of clients.

I think if some kind of breast worship or suckling fantasy was clearly part of the deal, and the professional's breasts were depicted in promotional material, then I think a client might be justified in feeling upset if they weren't as depicted. To what extent in today's cultural milieu one might consider implants as normal and therefore not needing disclosure but a reasonable question is again a fine judgement to make.

Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est. http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/226772/

It isn't just a simplistic issue about morals. I think there is the very serious issue of misrepresentation, dishonesty and deceit...in an industry that relies on everybody being honest and trustworthy.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/ http://www.clips4sale.com/store/26308