 |
| Doghouse_Reilly |
on Tue 9 Jun 09, 7:15 PM to Doghouse_Reilly's blog.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8091605.s...
As demonstrated by egg spattered Nazi lardo Nick Griffin.
Obviously the question on everybody's mind is, just what exactly is wrong with stones? You're not going to hurt anybody with an egg. Silly liberals. 
| 9 Jun 09, 7:19 PM CookieMonster UK, 6 yrs |
So you approve of similar Direct action against Nortyboy? or are you comfortable with a degree of hippocracy? | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:22 PM Doghouse_Reilly UK(MK), 6 yrs |
What do you mean? I shall not feed the trolls, Trolls are the mindkiller, Trolls are the little death that bring forum oblivion. | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:28 PM CookieMonster UK, 6 yrs |
You approve of people being attacked for their political beleifs? | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:36 PM Doghouse_Reilly UK(MK), 6 yrs |
In the case of Nick Griffin that's just one set of his beliefs that I would cheerfully attack him for. Blokes a Nazi, better generations than this one used to bayonet gobshites like him. I shall not feed the trolls, Trolls are the mindkiller, Trolls are the little death that bring forum oblivion. | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:38 PM Jahc99 UK, 5 yrs |
Racism is not a political belief, it is an injustice. Quite often a violent one. As was widely witnessed in the late 70s and early '80s, when physically standing up to the nf and the rest was an essential part of keeping the bastards off the streets.
Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you? | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:40 PM rabbot 12 yrs |
You don't defeat political opponents by physically attacking them or throwing eggs. It's people that are too lazy to involve themselves in serious politics that do such things.
'taste the whip, in love not given lightly, taste the whip now bleed for me' Velvet Underground | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:42 PM spero UK, 11 yrs |
Setting aside the question as to whether I would be comfortable living in a world ruled by hippos, then the point concerning approval / disapproval of direct action is well made. For most I think it is a very fine delicate balance between right & wrong / black & white / intolerance & tolerance and a matter of individual's conscious & morality, and I would suggest is often topic specific. For example, it might be possible to oppose ALF activities but approve of Greenpeace in it's anti-whaling guise and activities. If for example you disapprove of the BNP and don't disapprove of direct action against them, is it then possible not to accept their 'right' to take direct action in support of their political view point and aims? Perhaps we would better off in being ruled by hippos...
| ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:46 PM Prunesquallor UK(RG), 6 yrs |
Is that a belief in rule by horses? | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:46 PM X_Gordon_X UK, 3 yrs |
The question is , do you allow a party that ultimatley would abolish free speech, to have the freedom to speak and pursue that goal. | ||
| 9 Jun 09, 7:53 PM rabbot 12 yrs |
There are various ways to stop the freedom to speak without using violence. All this stuff just gives them more publicity and the media are promoting them like mad at the moment.
'taste the whip, in love not given lightly, taste the whip now bleed for me' Velvet Underground Edited 9 Jun 09, 7:55 PM by rabbot |
