This post is on the Other BDSM web board.
| 7 Jun 09, 11:06 PM CommanderBondage 3 yrs |
Fitness for purpose, s14(3) If the buyer expressly or impliedly makes his purpose for the goods known to the seller, the seller is obliged to make sure the goods provided are fit for that purpose, if it is reasonable for the buyer to rely on the seller's expertise. An example of the application of this provision can be found in Godley v Perry[13] Hope this helps... The Commander | |||
| 7 Jun 09, 11:07 PM Dovetail UK, 3 yrs |
The primary function of the Small Claims process was to avoid the need for a solicitor for small claims. If you have to pay Solicitors fees plus the small claims costs it starts to eat away at the money you are trying to claim. Either the court direct or the link given above will give the appropriate form. In the past there was a great deal of helpful info with the form. Good luck
| |||
| 7 Jun 09, 11:08 PM BadWulf UK(TA), 6 yrs |
Worth pondering that if she is knocking them up as a private seller on the side, the threat of exposing her to the tax authorities might well focus her attention. But ultimately small claims court is simple and straightforward, its very non-threatening and simple procedure from your perspective. certainly no need to involve solicitors whose costs you would not be able to reclaim. John
My, what sharp teeth I have. Edited 8 Jun 09, 9:58 AM by BadWulf | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 5:39 PM Susan_Williams UK(CH), 3 yrs |
You can even claim through the Small Claims court on-line if you wish. https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp You have to be absolutely sure you get all the details correct though. One small error in a date or a number could invalidate the claim. Susan Williams | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 6:05 PM Lockey UK(NW), 4 yrs |
I'm not sure it's directly relevant here, but there's a little known instrument known as a garnishee IIRC. I'm no expert but in laymans terms - if you can persuade a judge that you have a strong case, he grants it. The amount in dispute is legally frozen pending judgement. In other words, the defendant ( or their bank, if served there) , in this case, would be legally obliged to retain £400 available. Great for pissing people off " I'm sorry Miss scam merchant, but yes, you have £400 in your account, and no, we can't let you withdraw it" I'd guess it's designed for corporate use mainly, ie: "I'm sorry but we are unable to pay our liability to you of £10m" "Right, and how much was the bonus your board voted itself yesterday?" "...er....£10m...."
Probably not worth it for the sum concerned, I'd guess small claims, but it depends if you have your vindictive streak on.... and I know you usually do | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 6:35 PM Diablos_patience UK, 6 yrs |
You aint seen nothing yet... try ripping me off to the tune of £400 and you will see just how relentlessly vindictive i can really be....... ~* Raku wa ku no tané; ku wa raku no tané. *~ | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 7:07 PM Lockey UK(NW), 4 yrs |
Tempting.... very, very tempting | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 7:18 PM The_Jo UK(S), 3 yrs |
Is naming and shaming allowed on here? | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 7:19 PM Diablos_patience UK, 6 yrs |
I dare you... i would advise you to watch this space before you attempt it...... ~* Raku wa ku no tané; ku wa raku no tané. *~ | |||
| 8 Jun 09, 7:23 PM Diablos_patience UK, 6 yrs |
Nope, otherwise i would have plastered the name of a certain playing card all over the place.... but im being a good girl.... for now. ~* Raku wa ku no tané; ku wa raku no tané. *~ |