This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board.
| 11 Jun 09, 9:15 AM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs    |
I've already explained by your fake profile wouldn't have generated any cash. True fin subs wouldn't have fallen for it and timewasting subs wouldn't care, they would manipulate you for some free domming. Why is taking cash from a consenting happy fin sub so bad that it needs to be 'cleansed' by donating it to charity? Huh? Should I give all the profits from my sessions to charity as well? [/quote] But the point is the one's that contacted me came across as pretty serious about sending me cash. They may not have done in the end but, I guess you would have the same issue. Some would say that they would and then when it came to it they wouldnt, others may well do though. I have never suggested that you give your domming profits to charity as you provide a tangiable service and a well needed one in many cases. What I said was that if you are taking cash for doing nothing then morally perhaps you should think a little more about what happens to that cash and to the person giving it. Otherwise it's not about BDSM it's about rank profiteering and there is a big difference. At the end of the day we have talked this one through to the death and will probably have to agree to disagree. If your conscience can justify it then thats up to you but, personally I feel sorry for the people that are out of pocket. [/quote] So you are saying that fin domme isn't a valid form of BDSM? YKINOK then? And who says fin dommes do precisely nothing? What experience do you base your opinion on? Your fake profile? "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness | ||||||
| 11 Jun 09, 7:41 PM Doghouse_Reilly UK(MK), 6 yrs  |
The term Findomme makes it sound like the fetish involves a fish. I shall not feed the trolls, Trolls are the mindkiller, Trolls are the little death that bring forum oblivion. | ||||||
| 11 Jun 09, 10:27 PM soulful1 UK(RG), 5 yrs |
Thanks for the link I'll have a look at it when I get chance In answer to your questions no I dont feel sorry for people that engage in other forms of BDSM, of course not, otherwise I wouldnt be on here lol. I feel sorry for the fin subs because actually looking at some of the posts on here they are just seen as a walking bank balance and little else. As for having to spend lots of time writing mails etc I would suspect that many are cut and pasted or maybe I'm being cynical and no offence is intended by that comment BTW.
Everythings going to be ok, as long as I have enough beers: | ||||||
| 11 Jun 09, 10:50 PM soulful1 UK(RG), 5 yrs |
But the point is the one's that contacted me came across as pretty serious about sending me cash. They may not have done in the end but, I guess you would have the same issue. Some would say that they would and then when it came to it they wouldnt, others may well do though. I have never suggested that you give your domming profits to charity as you provide a tangiable service and a well needed one in many cases. What I said was that if you are taking cash for doing nothing then morally perhaps you should think a little more about what happens to that cash and to the person giving it. Otherwise it's not about BDSM it's about rank profiteering and there is a big difference. At the end of the day we have talked this one through to the death and will probably have to agree to disagree. If your conscience can justify it then thats up to you but, personally I feel sorry for the people that are out of pocket. [/quote] So you are saying that fin domme isn't a valid form of BDSM? YKINOK then? And who says fin dommes do precisely nothing? What experience do you base your opinion on? Your fake profile? [/quote] I assume that you are refering to my Troy one and not my profile now? In my view, no I dont see anything linking into BDSM if all you want to do is take some person's money that you have never met and never will do!! Also it would be very easy for somebody to knock up a few letters and then individualise them and cut and paste them to suit. I'm not saying you do as I'm talking more generically but I think you can see where I'm coming from. Sorry but that is just the way I see it. Everythings going to be ok, as long as I have enough beers: Edited 11 Jun 09, 10:51 PM by soulful1 | ||||||
| 29 Jun 09, 11:42 AM Aurorian UK(HD), 5 yrs £ |
If consenting adults are happy to do this (or anything), then where's the problem? I would do it and not feel morally corrupt, why not? Good to see some sensible replies here, Lady Anna has posted a lot of what I was thinking, well put as always! | ||||||
| 29 Jun 09, 9:48 PM BarbieSlutLoki UK(E), 6 yrs |
Plenty of people do it, it's called marriage The first rule of Brat Club, we don't talk about Brat Club... | ||||||
| 7 Jul 09, 10:04 PM moghalman UK(EC), 12 yrs |
I think it's important to be able to tell right from wrong. | ||||||
| 7 Jul 09, 10:08 PM moghalman UK(EC), 12 yrs |
Well if that's not a fact then I dread to think what the alternative could potentially be. | ||||||
| 7 Jul 09, 10:10 PM moghalman UK(EC), 12 yrs |
I understand what you are saying; my personal opinion is that it is not ok to be amoral or immoral | ||||||
| 7 Jul 09, 10:27 PM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs |
But nobody actually involved in Fin Dom thinks it's wrong - so what's your point? "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness |
